Linux-Networking Digest #190, Volume #12 Wed, 11 Aug 99 15:13:46 EDT
Contents:
IPChains question... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
routing question ("Darrin")
TCP connects but sends no data ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: what NIC + Hub do you pros use? ("Cliff")
Re: Can't get 3c905b working...HELP???? ("Cliff")
Re: IPchains...one internal host deny ("Jim")
Re: Windows Server, Linux Client? [Samba Peer to Peer? Revised] ("Marc Marais")
PPP troubles (mcj)
Re: IPChains question... (peter)
Re: Subnetworking ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Corporate Site Access ("Andrey Smirnov")
Network Slipping Problem (Scott Shoemaker)
Re: Can't get 3c905b working...HELP???? [resolved] (Daniel Bonds)
NE2000 PCI installation problems... (Konstantin Gonikman)
named/dns wants network connection on bootup - why? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Samba +NTws (Patrick)
Terminal Server Ports - RH5.2 ("Richard")
Windows client can't Active FTP through firewall. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
10baseT or 100baseT hub? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Sockets, FIOASYNC etc. AAAAAAAGh! (Steven J Haeck)
Re: port forwarding ("Dave")
Re: The last steps to take to a network(help!!!) ("Robert_Glover")
Re: Windows client can't Active FTP through firewall. ("Paskal van Lomm")
Re: mac address ("Andrey Smirnov")
Can I see who is connecting?? ("Paskal van Lomm")
Re: symbolic link not work in ftpd (Drew)
services not available (Philipp Zambelli)
Re: Domain Problems - Someone else is aliased against my domain ("Marcus B�ttemeyer")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPChains question...
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:16:33 GMT
I am paying traffic for my RH server but there are some networks that
are cost-excluded.
So, what I need is a ipchains configuration that would count the bytes
sent to networks that are charged (some 10 networks). I tried setting up
the chains but no luck.
Is anyone out there that has some chains file doing some similar?
Ammar
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Darrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routing question
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:05:38 -0700
Here's my situation:
I have a linux machine 192.168.1.20 on eth0
running diald and masqurading for the localnet (192.168.1.n)
route table looks like:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
tc3.pacinfo.com * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ppp0
localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
3429 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 43
eth1
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
923 lo
default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0
9 ppp0
this routing table was printed while the linux box was connected to the
internet and every machine can on the 192.168.1.x network can see it. I
recently added a second lan card on eth1 at 192.168.2.20 as you can see
above.
My second linux machine is at 192.168.2.10 on its eth0, and is the only box
currently on that side of the network (I guess linux box 1 would be
considered a router).
I can ping from linux box 2 to any 192.168.1.x machine
I can ping from any 192.168.1.x machine to 192.168.2.10 (box 2)
So both legs of my local network are doing ok.
The problem is that box 2 can not see the internet. I think it has something
to do with the routing table, but as this is my first attempt at routing, I
don't know enough to fix it. Could someone help me over this hurdle
please???
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP connects but sends no data
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:32:16 GMT
This happens once in a while in a Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36 server.
Everything is fine, suddenly the server stops transferring TCP data. It
continues to accept connections on ports that there are services
running on, but it looks like it's "mute".
That is, if you telnet to ports like http, pop etc. the connections are
actually made, but the server does not respond to data nor sends
anything.
It's also important to note that this affects all daemons, regardless
of they are run from inetd or standalone. The symptons are the same for
all of them: connection is accepted, no data is transferred.
Any hint?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: what NIC + Hub do you pros use?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:45:35 GMT
I'll second that. The OfficeConnect product line is real easy to use.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
Greg Leblanc wrote in message <7or6sl$mr1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>At work we use almost exclusively Intel and 3Com nics. We have a large
>number of 3com managed hubs. We like their products, they seem to
>perform well, and they have VERY good support.
> Greg
>
------------------------------
From: "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't get 3c905b working...HELP????
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:42:35 GMT
On the 3c509b version you disable PnP with a command line option to the
config program. Try 3c90xcfg.exe /? or /h to see if you can get a help
screen on the command line parameters. As I recall the read me file also
had them and the parameter for disabling PnP was something like /disablepnp.
--
-Cliff
Views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
Concordia Net, Inc. When replying via email please use; cwheat at concordia
dot net not
root@localhost
gonZo theGreaT wrote in message ...
>
>
>Yup, thats what I was using !
>Anywhere in there should be an option to disable the PnP-function of the
>card !
>
[snip]
------------------------------
From: "Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPchains...one internal host deny
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:29:23 -0700
I think 'ipchains -A forward -s AA.AA.AA.AA -d BB.BB.BB.BB -j DENY' might
work or maybe drop the '-j'
the way to read this line might be more helpfull
AA.AA.AA.AA the ip of the internal machine
BB.BB.BB.BB the ip of the restricted site.
-A add this rule
forward to the forwarding chain of rules
-s if the source address is
-d and the destination is
-j jump to
DENY the deny the transfer
------------------------------
From: "Marc Marais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows Server, Linux Client? [Samba Peer to Peer? Revised]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:09:02 -0700
Chris Testa wrote in message <7oqjfa$1on$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>OK, here is my problem. For the past while I have had a LAN connecting my
>parents Win95 machine to my Win98 macine. The 95 machine has a connection
>to the phone line, and I have been using a Proxy server to connect to that
>machine and use the net at the same time. On Sunday I installed Red Hat
6.0
>on my machine. My problem is that I want to connect to the internet using
>Linux through my parent's machine like I have always done, but I can't find
>any info on how to do it. My ISP dynamically allocates our IP address, so
>that complicates the matter. Basically, here's the setup:
>
[> /dev/null]
>
>- Chris
>
>
There are some masquerading tools for Windoze such as Wingate and Sygate (I
think thats the name) and probably others too.
Marc
------------------------------
From: mcj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP troubles
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:58:55 GMT
Hello,
I'm having a bit of trouble with getting a PPP connection going with
Mindspring. The odd part is, it works fine with other providers. I am
running Debian potato (the development version), using pppd 2.3.8. The
modem dials, connects, authenticates through a chat script, but it
never gets its IP and the connection hangs up after about 15 seconds.
Initially, the logfile said that the serial link was looped back, but I
resolved that problem.
Even weirder is, I have another machine running Debian potato as well,
and it works fine on there. Perhaps there is something I'm not
thinking of that I have configured on the non-working machine for
specific use on another provider that is preventing it from getting the
correct IP? What misconfiguration could possibly cause that error? I
am at a loss.
Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
- mcj
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPChains question...
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:15:10 +0200
Make a new chain for the costly networks.
Make the rules to hit costly networks, jump to empty chain.
This will increment packet and byte counters.
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Subnetworking
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:45:26 -0700
What is your Subnet mask?
Amanda Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ore0m$7gl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have got 127 public IP from my ISP, (let say from A.B.C.1 to A.B.C.127).
I
> want to divide it into subbnetworks. How should my routing table look
like?
> Let's say A.B.C.120 is my ethernet interface (eth0) of a linux box to the
> ISP and eth1 (A.B.C.62) will be my subnetwork (IP address from A.B.C.1 to
> A.B.C.62) and a 3rd network interface to our private network.
>
>
> --------------------------------
> eth0| |eth1
> A.B.C.120 | |A.B.C.62
> ------------------| Linux box |------------------
> Subnet IP from A.B.C.1 to A.B.C.62
> | |
> | |
> ---------------------------------
> |eth2
> | 10.0.0.1
> |
> Private network
> 10.0.0.*
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Amanda
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Corporate Site Access
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:33:30 -0700
Hello,
Sounds like the site you are trying to connect to is using
MS-Authentication, and this means that you will not be able to use Netscape
or any other browser except IE3.01 and higher.
You can try to talk to the WebAdmin, and convince this person to change
authentication to the basic text, but I doubt that you will be successful.
Good luck!
Michael Born <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call into my company's corporate network using Netscape
> 4.51 (under Mandrake Linux 5.3). When I sign on to Worldnet using IE5 on
> Windoze and access the page (ie https://www2.company.com), I get
> prompted for the User Name, Password, and Domain) and can log in. When I
> access the page in netscape, I get a box that says
> "Enter username for unknown at www2.company.com" and requests the user
> name and password (but not the domain). When I enter my login info, I
> get the message:
>
> 401.2 Unauthorized: Logon Failed due to server configuration
>
> How (or can I) get logged in thru Netscape?
>
> TIA,
> Mike
>
------------------------------
From: Scott Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network Slipping Problem
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:36:41 GMT
I have a new Compaq 3000 w/dual P3/500s server on which I have loaded RH
6.0 (a new installation). I am using IP, samba, and netatalk to access
this server. I have a problem where I can restart the server and have
access to it for anywhere from 2 minutes to 12 hours or so. After that
time, it seems that all network communication is lost. I cannot ping
out or see any clients from the Linux server at all or vice-versa unless
I reboot it. After that, it stays up for awhile until it happens again.
I have replaced all of the cabling and the Ethernet card as well as the
switch that it is plugged into with known good equipment, but nothing
seems to take care of the problem. When I look at the interface in Net
Config, it is showing me that the interface is active. Is there
something else that I should be doing to help solve this problem? HELP!
Scott
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Bonds)
Subject: Re: Can't get 3c905b working...HELP???? [resolved]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:20:01 GMT
Well, I think I got it working last night. I found something in a
dejanews search about a how screwy the PCI slots can be on the Abit
BP6 (my new motherboard). Apparently, they might not all be
busmastering capable and there's all kinds of weird IRQ sharing
issues. I moved the card around a few times and eventually got it
working with kernel drivers... still no modules.. oh well.
I didn't have a crossover cable to connect it to my other PC as I had
planned, but I'm making one as we speak and will hopefully get it up
and running tonight.. woohoo. I'll probably see if I can find a newer
3c90xcfg from 3com that will disable card PnP and maybe throw the new
2.2.11 kernel in just to confuse things. :-)
At any rate, thanks for the help...
Daniel
------------------------------
From: Konstantin Gonikman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.elsa,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: NE2000 PCI installation problems...
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 00:08:25 +0200
Hi,
I have a problem to install my PCI net-card. It has a 89c940 chip (i think it's
NE2000-compatible).
My Kernel says:
=========
ne2k-pci.c:v0.99L 2/7/98 D. Becker/P. Gortmaker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ne2k-pci.html
WARNING: The PCI BIOS assigned this PCI NE2k card to IRQ 0, which is unlikely to
work!.
You should use the PCI BIOS setup to assign a valid IRQ line.
ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'Winbond 89C940' at I/O 0xb800, IRQ 0.
eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xb800, IRQ 0, 00:00:E8:59:C7:06.
=========
Should I change the IRQ for this card in the BIOS? But how?
Can you help me please?
Thanks,
Konstantin
--
================================================================
"All I want is my God-given right to 95% of the browser market."
James Barksdale, Netscape�s chief executive
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: named/dns wants network connection on bootup - why?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:13:21 -0800
Hello. I have a question that I'm hoping someone can help
me with.
Here's the basic question in case it is something simple.
Afterwards I have more complete information if it is needed.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Basic Problem:
When my linux box boots up, named starts a connection to
the internet. Whenever I have named set to start at
bootup, the linux box makes a connection to the gateway
machine on my network(a win98 box with dial-up internet)
and causes a dial-on demand connection to the internet.
What is the linux box doing? It would seem to me that it
would not need to make a connection until a client makes a
dns request of it. Is there something that it is wanting to
check each time it boots?
More info:
I'm testing a linux box in the following environment:
A windows98 machine has a dial-up connection to the
internet. It acts as a gateway to the internet for other
machines on the network.
I have a linux box(redhat 5.2 with latest bind) which I
am experimenting with using as a dns server for the local
network. It is setup to be a caching server for all the
machines on the network plus as a true nameserver for
my local domain(registered with internic but not being
served on the internet by any "live" dns).
All machines are using 192.168.*.* addresses.
When the linux box boots up, it causes the win98 machine to
make a dial-on demand connection to the internet. This is
only if named is set to run at boot time.
I can not figure out why named is trying to connect to
something outside when no one has yet made a query of it.
Any ideas?
Thanks much for any help.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba +NTws
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:06:44 GMT
Well, to put it blunt!
with the 2.0.3 version of samba I had great performance (read as wel as
write) the problem has introduced itself with 2.0.5. So forget the
problem being on the NT side since nothing has changed there.
Since I set SO_RCVBUF=65536 and SO_SNDBUF=16384 the writeperformance to
my server has improved but still is way of the 2.0.3 result.
reading a lot of small files also sucks with this samba release and that
has also improved (but not to it's original level) by the above
mentioned settings.
and about it working fine with w2k and not with nt4? well that could
just be dumb luck knowing microsoft.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
QuestionExchange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a small problem and I don't see the solution, maybe you
> > do. I run a server (P2-300, Mandrake Linux with kernel
> > 2.3.12) with Samba 2.0.5a on it. When I connect a WinNT4
> > workstation to the domain (to which the Samba machine is PDC)
> > then read performance is good but write performance sucks, I
> > get timeouts etc. When I connect a Win2k workstation to it the
> > performance is very good both read and write. The networktype
> > is 16Mbit tokenring, on IP level everything is great. the user
> > authentification at logontime also works great. Any idea
> > what's wrong here? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
> SEND ONLY ANSWERS ENDORIGINAL Body IS:Often speed varies
> widely, and SMB isnt the greatest. Try playing with the
> SMB.conf settings, and try 'write raw = on' (Or off, if its
> already set. Often times its just a bug in one os or another.
> There are other settings you can tweak, like max xmit = 2048,
> read raw = yes, and about a dozen others, but the problem is
> often a matter of SP's on NT, try upgrading if you can, but
> bluntly, it could possibly be as good as it gets. You might
> renice samba for a better priority. Unfortunately, since it
> _does_ work, there is no obvious problem, its not an issue of
> if, so all the connections are good, but unfortunately, the
> speed is influenced by a wide amount of things, and many are
> out of your control. Since you said it worked well on Win2k,
> and not on NT, i would suspect NT at fault, not samba. Try
> downloading newer SP's, or waiting for SP6. Best of Luck!
>
> --
> This answer is courtesy of QuestionExchange.com
>
http://www.questionexchange.com/servlet1/showUsenetGuest?ans_id=2380&cus
_id=USENET&qtn_id=1528
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Terminal Server Ports - RH5.2
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:14:05 -0700
I need to connect about 60 printers which are scattered around on misc.
terminal / print servers, such as Bay Networks devices, HP JetDirect cards,
etc.
I know that I can spool these printers via /etc/printcap, but I would like
to know if I can connect them as /dev files? I am able to do this on a Data
General system using a card called a VTC (Virtual Terminal Controller). Does
anyone know of a similar method for Linux? Either a hardware or software
solution would be welcome.
The reason is that we have legacy software which is written in such a way
that spooled printing can't be used - only directly connected devices. I
think this was a security precaution to do with printing cheques.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Richard Koett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows client can't Active FTP through firewall.
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:56:26 GMT
Hi,
For the past 2 days I've been trying to get ftp forwarding to work in
our company's network.
The configuration is such:
Firewall - runs ipmasquerading & ipmasqadm portfw.
Internal Machine with FTP server.
The firewall linux box binds to several Internet IP addresses (IP
Aliasing) and when a client FTP to one of those IPs, the ftp traffic
will be port forwarded to the internal machine's FTP server.
This configuration works well only when a Linux FTP client makes an
active connection to the ftp site. It will not work for passive mode
cos' the author for ipmasqadm told me that it is not supported yet.
Anyhow, the question is:
Why the hack Windows FTP client wouldn't be able to connect to the same
FTP server that's working for Linux FTP client?
I've tried CuteFTP, WSFTP, LeechFTP, FTPControl to no avail. These
client's allow you to setup passive connection but I'm not sure if
their default is active connection or not??? I'm saying this because
when I did a "netstat -M" on the firewall during the ftp session from
the Windows Client, there's not connection from the source ftp-data
port (20) to a high port on the firewall, which is what active
connection does.
Any tips/ideas/suggestions on how I can achieve FTP forwarding is very
much appreciated! Thanks.
Winston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 10baseT or 100baseT hub?
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:58:01 GMT
Hi
should I buy 10baset or 100baset hub. I have three computers
that I want to use for network. What I heard is that 100baset hub is
unnessary for small network. Is it true?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Steven J Haeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Sockets, FIOASYNC etc. AAAAAAAGh!
Date: 11 Aug 1999 19:28:25 +0100
> Please can anyone offer some assistance. I require to use the
> FIOASYNC ioctl in order to ensure that I get IO signals on a UDP
> socket. While I get no error returned, I also get no signals.
>
> I am aware that this has been a recent issue with the Linux kernel,
> but as I understand from linuxhq.com, " FIOASYNC (O_SYNC) IOCTL
> support" was fixed in version 2.2.5. I run redhat 6.0, and
> uname -a replies
>
> Linux hagal.dcs.ed.ac.uk 2.2.5-15 ...
I've resolved this problem now - I was using a SIOCGPGRP ioctl to set
my process to receive signals, whereas it appears I should have been
using the fcntl F_SETOWN. I am still somewhat surprised that I got no
error returned from this inappropriate ioctl (which works fine on
Solaris).
Now I'm trying to get a direct handle on the file descriptor which
caused the IO signal using the fcntl F_SETSIG and SA_SIGINFO argument
to sigaction. Alas, I get no new arguments to my signal handler -
contrary to what "man fcntl" says I should. Is it relevant that I had
to #define __USE_GNU to get at F_SETSIG.
I have read that I should use a real-time signal (>32) to make use of
SA_SIGINFO, and also that I don't need to. Neither seems to make any
difference. A similar question to last time - does anyone use
this facility? Which "gotcha" have I fallen foul of this time?
--
Steven J Haeck
Tel. : 0131-650-5165 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax. : 0131-667-7209 WWW : http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/sjh
------------------------------
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: port forwarding
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:34:51 -0500
Need to use the ipmasqadm tool. Looks like you have masquarading set up
correctly but to redirect ports to internal machines you have to set up the
port forwarding.
Here's the command: ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp x.x.x.x XX -R x.x.x.x XX
The first IP address is the real Internet address and the second is the
private internal address. The XX is the port number that you would want to
forward. Works excellent.
> > Adrian wrote:
> > >
> > > I want to take packets sent from outside my network to x port on my
> > > firewall and forward them to x port on a machine behind it.
> > > slack 4.0 kernel 2.2.10 - ipforwarding and masq on
> > >
> > > using the ipchains command I can forward packets from x port on my
> > > firewall machine to y port on my firewall machine - I'm sure there
must
> > > be a way to send them to my internal machine.
> > >
> > > ipautofw does it - but I don't want to set it up on my machine
> > > ipautofw -A -r tcp 21 -h 192.168.1.5
> > >
> > > All I want to know is what is the equivalent syntax for ipchains - or
> > > can I not do it at all and have to change how I have setup my machine.
> > > Thanks
> > > /C
>
------------------------------
From: "Robert_Glover" <Please_reply_to@newsgroup>
Subject: Re: The last steps to take to a network(help!!!)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 16:12:29 -0000
You did look at the NET-3-HOWTO didn't you?
1. What does ifconfig say?
2. Have you tried to ping the loopback device 127.0.0.1?
3. Can you ping the adapter address of SuSE 6.1 box?
Bas van Weelde wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Ok. What i reached after all by myself may be called a giant succes!!
There is just one thing: My two clients cannot be reached or seen by
the
server (SuSE 6.1)
Everything is well connected as far as I can see.
The server is a pentium 100 mhz.
Connected through a hub are 2 Windows 95 workstations with
TCP/IP;netbeui.
Samba is installed and the adapters are all working without conflicts
or
so. The domain name is the same as the working group on the 2 p.c.'s
Though, I cannot ping.
What might be the trouble here?
do you have an idea hot to fix this? Please help me out! I will
include
you in my prayers.
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba is installed
------------------------------
From: "Paskal van Lomm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows client can't Active FTP through firewall.
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:21:55 +0200
Did you try: modprobe ip_masq_ftp ??
I've done this and that solved my similar problem.
Regards,
Paskal
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mac address
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:21:26 -0700
Correction... You don't have to be logged in as root, just specify full path
to the ifconfig command:
Normally
/sbin/ifconfig -a
Good luck!
Gregory D. Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Roger wrote:
>
> > Under linux how would you get the hardware address(mac address) of the
> > ethernet card your using, besides looking on the card itself.
> >
> > Thanks...
>
> Use the ifconfig utility when logged in as the root user or after typing
> su and the root password at a terminal prompt.
> Easy as falling off a log in the river.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Paskal van Lomm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can I see who is connecting??
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 20:17:15 +0200
Hi,
My 486 is running Slackware 4.0 and acts as a firewall for the rest of my
network.
If someone from the Internet is trying to reach my network, can I see on
what port he/she is calling and what type of service he wants to reach (WWW,
FTP, etc)?
Unfortunately I'm not able to run X, so I have to use a non-graphical
utility.
Thnkx.
Paskal
------------------------------
From: Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: symbolic link not work in ftpd
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:21:09 -0800
I also have the same problem, except my link points to a linux partition.
I want all users with the root:
/home/ftp
to see and be able to use a link which points to:
/mount/hdd2
I am using PROftpd and cant get it working right either.
Drew
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: Philipp Zambelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: services not available
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:45:26 +0200
help!
my system:
suse 6.1.
internet as client works http, ftp, ...
no firewall
static IP
inetd started
all services in inetd.conf specified
host.* edited (allow ALL:ALL - very whriskey:)
/etc/services updated
all services work on localhost telnet localhost
ftp localhost etc. works
or local:
ftp IP, .... (same obviously)
as remote user just ping IP works
ftp, telnet ... IP does not work.
Error message:
glftpd runs on port 8000 -->
freelove:~ 6% ftp 212.186.195.125 8000
20 sec.....
ftp: connect: Operation timed out
ftp>
??????????
could you please help me !
--
_________________________________
Philipp Zambelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Marcus B�ttemeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Domain Problems - Someone else is aliased against my domain
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 18:44:31 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
7os65m$d4v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thats what I thought. When I went to mail.norske.org last night, it
> took me directly to norske.com. I tried it today though, and it did
> not connect.
What I (and also my ISP) currently see is this: Yous DNS seems to be set
correctly to DNS3 + DNS4.REGISTER.COM. At last these Servers return the
correct A-Record for your host (24.8.23.36) BUT: These Servers answer to an
MX query with: 10 mail2.siteamerica.com (and also with 6 Backup MXer I
ignore now). This resolves to 209.67.50.14 which does not seem to be your
host.
Best guess: Contact your ISP and kick their ass for not changing the
MX-record...
-mb
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
