Linux-Networking Digest #212, Volume #12 Fri, 13 Aug 99 12:13:42 EDT
Contents:
Do I need default entry in Route table?
Re: Problem with PCMCIA network card (Geoff Allsup)
Re: @Home Cable Modem and Linux (Bob Tennent)
Re: telnet to slow from W95 (Juri Haberland)
please help (Raghav Suri)
linux and mac (Filipe Tabosa)
Re: 10baseT or 100baseT hub? (Lindoze 2000)
Red Hat 6.0 and isapnp.conf (Joe News)
Re: telnet to slow from W95 (Ramon Arxer i Galabert)
Re: Wireless networks (Ville Nummela)
Proxy Serving across Cable Modem (John Lindemuth)
Re: Proxy Serving across Cable Modem (dmalcolm)
VMware - wow! ("me")
socket++ for linux (Erwin Hogeweg)
Difficulty with eth0 after Sound Card setup (Hatton Humphrey)
eth interface permissions ("Customer")
Re: Getting Desperate... MTU problem win IP MASQ (Roger Plant)
Re: Link with a Netware LAN (Gustin Kiffney)
Re: Abdullah & Jessie (and any one else) ("Jonathan Wilson")
Re: ports used for instant messenger ("John F. McClure")
problems to get crossover ethernet connection (David)
Re: ports used for instant messenger (dmalcolm)
traffic control, ip prioriting ("Philipp Koch")
Re: Link with a Netware LAN (Tom)
THNKX!: Re: Can I see who is connecting?? ("Paskal van Lomm")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Do I need default entry in Route table?
Date: 13 Aug 1999 05:39:13 GMT
I want to connect two boxes with RH6.0 using ethernet cards. Neither box
will connect to anything else. Will a rouoting table of two entries like
this suffice?
10.1.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U lo
Thanks in advance for your input
cliff
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Allsup)
Subject: Re: Problem with PCMCIA network card
Date: 13 Aug 1999 11:56:06 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 Aug 1999 00:13:49 GMT, Walid A. Majid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i have a toshiba tecra 500cdt with red hat 6.0 on it (kernel 2.2.5-15)
>with a 3com pcmcia network card (model 3ccfe574bt). i have been trying
>unsuccessfuly to configure the network interface and was wondering if
>someone can point me to the right direction.
>
>the problem is that when i try to use the eth0 interface, either using
>usernet or by issuing the following command:
> sh -x /etc/pcmcia/network start eth0
>i get the following message:
>
> delaying eth0 initialization
>
>
>one problem which i have noticed is that when i insert my card, the
>machine beeps only once - my understanding based on reading the howto's
>was that it should beep twice.
>
>but i believe linux recognizes my card because issuing 'cardctl ident'
>comes back with:
> socket 1:
> product info: "3Com", "Megahertz 574B", "B", "001"
> manfid: 0x0101, 0x0574
> function: 6 (network)
>
>cardctl status comes back with:
> socket 1:
> 5v 16-bit card present
> function 0: read, write protect
>
>and last, /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia has a line that says:
> PCMCIA=yes
>
>if anyone can help i would really appreciate it.
>
I've got a Toshiba 4000CDT and RH 6.0 and had similar problems -
First problem was the order of services coming up in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d;
inet was starting before pcmcia, so changed S##pcmcia to a ## (number)
before the inet startup.
Also, for some reason, the card would try to latch onto IRQ 9 and then
just wouldn't work; in /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia, the line beginning with
PCIC_OPTS is usually empty; I changed this to the following:
PCIC_OPTS="irq_list=3,4,7,10,12"
(per PCMCIA-HOWTO info, I think) This seemed to fix things for me.
When I have a modem card in one of the slots, my 3COM card ends up
on IRQ3; if my SCSI card is installed, it's on IRQ10; either way, it
now works;
and BTW, the status line I get back for the card normally reads:
Function 0: ready
when everything is OK...
Hope this helps - I found my answers deep in the HOWTO's...
geoff
******************************************************************
Geoff Allsup Upper Ocean Processes Group
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA, USA
******************************************************************
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: @Home Cable Modem and Linux
Date: 13 Aug 1999 11:53:34 GMT
Reply-To: rdt(a)cs.queensu.ca
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 23:00:42 GMT, Chad Pierce wrote:
>
> I have installed Mandrake-Linux 6.0 and need help getting the @home cable
>modem to work, using my 3 Com 3C9XX ethernet card. Linux recognized the
>ethernet card, but when I go in to set up the network connection, I get no
>response from @home. Is there a trick to setting up the @home service.
>I've spent about 4 hours trying to get this to work, and am now desperate.
>I want to ditch windows, but without my cable modem, I would be lost. So I
>still have to keep it running. If anyone can help, I'd be appreciative.
>
You're using dhcp? Find the call to dhcpcd or pump in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup
and add the hostname option (-h hostname). If you're using pump, make sure
you have the latest version (0.7.0).
Bob T.
------------------------------
From: Juri Haberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet to slow from W95
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:00:43 +0200
ArTec - Vincent MAURY wrote:
>
> 1st question
>
> I've to wait more than 30secs before I can telnet a Linux box from W95
> (WNT4)
>
> Do you know how to speed this ?
>
> 2nd
> I seem to have the same problem with mail daemon ....
Your Linux box tries to do a reverse DNS lookup for the IP address of
your W95/NT box. So if you don't have configured a DNS server or you
don't have a proper reverse entry in your DNS zone file then your Linux
box have to wait for a time-out. To overcome this you have to put the IP
address of your W95/NT box into /etc/hosts of your Linux box.
Hope this helps
juri
------------------------------
From: Raghav Suri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please help
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 18:28:05 +0530
i have rh6.0 installed with one ethernet card and modem link to the
internet
SCENARIO
eth0 (IP 192.168.0.5) is connected to internal network (win98)
ppp0 (Dynamic IP) is used to connect to the internet
Internet is running fine from my linux box
cannot connect to the internet from win98 machines
I am a newbie to ipchains etc.
Kindly help me on how to configure my linux as such that every win98
machine can taste the internet.
thanks
raghav
------------------------------
From: Filipe Tabosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux and mac
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:31:20 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm a new user of linux,I have a PC box with red hat 5.2 and a Imac
connected, and i want to share folder betwen each others.
I use netatalk to connect the Imac to linux it works fine, but I can't
find a way to connect Linux to mac to access a shared folder.
Anyone have a some clues or solution ?
Thanks
Filipe
Humide et suintant
------------------------------
From: Lindoze 2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 10baseT or 100baseT hub?
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 01:32:40 -0400
100M bit cards cost two dollars more than a 10M bit card so why not?
a 10Mb hub cost 50 smackers, a 100mb hub cost 70 smackers, so why not?
I did a flood ping and about half of the 100mb band width was used.
that was a little less than 50mb /s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> should I buy 10baset or 100baset hub. I have three computers
> that I want to use for network. What I heard is that 100baset hub is
> unnessary for small network. Is it true?
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
--
Thank you for your valuable input. Your useful answers will benifit
other users as well.
You are Linux!
########################################################
## ##
## My Experiment ##
## http://www.FusionPlant.com ##
## ##
########################################################
------------------------------
From: Joe News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Red Hat 6.0 and isapnp.conf
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:56:21 -0400
Hello.
I've been trying to get my Motorola modemSURFR, internal,
working under RH 6.0 My understanding is that were
never any problems under 5.2
Anyway, I've been able to get the modem to ring, and
for my provider's end to answer, but I've never been
able to authenticate and get an IP. In the past, I
played around with the chat script and with the MAKEDEV
command to make some progress.
Lately I've been trying to use pnpdump and the isapnp.conf
file to see if the problem lies there. I have information
on IRQ's and addresses from both Winder95 and from Linux
(via /var/log/messages)
Linux detects the following serial devices:
ttys00 at 0x03f8 irq=4 is a 16550A
ttys01 at 0x02f8 irq=3 " "
ttys02 at 0x03e8 irq=4 " "
...This appears to be some kind of IRQ conflict, no?
Winders95 tells me that it sees my modem at IRQ 5, 03e8-03ef
does anyone have any suggestions?
Cheers,
Watts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:42:57 +0200
From: Ramon Arxer i Galabert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: telnet to slow from W95
Dear friend,
Yesterday I posted a message with a doubt similar the one you answered.
Thanks a lot.
Your faithfully,
Ramon Arxer
(Electronic engineer)
> Your Linux box tries to do a reverse DNS lookup for the IP address of
> your W95/NT box. So if you don't have configured a DNS server or you
> don't have a proper reverse entry in your DNS zone file then your Linux
> box have to wait for a time-out. To overcome this you have to put the IP
> address of your W95/NT box into /etc/hosts of your Linux box.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> juri
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ville Nummela)
Subject: Re: Wireless networks
Date: 13 Aug 1999 06:43:22 GMT
On 13 Aug 1999 00:57:55 GMT, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anybody know of any wireless networking products that work with RedHat
>6?
What do you mean by "networking products"? There are several wireless
networking cards that work with Linux. e.g. Lucent Wavelan cards, I've
been using Lucent WaveLAN/IEEE PCMCIA cards, they work just fine. If you
mean software, what kind of software? There exist mobile IP software for
Linux etc.
--
| No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority, |
| you can't increase the speed of light. - RFC 1925 |
------------------------------
From: John Lindemuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Proxy Serving across Cable Modem
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 18:30:45 GMT
I am looking to connect my home network to the internet through a TCI
cablemodem. I have found documentation on how to connect the cable modem
to the linux box and how to connect two network cards so that the linux
box can serve the internet to my home Network. My questions is what type
of connection should I use IP Masquerading, or proxy server with
firewall. I would like to have the security of firewall since I have
heard bad things about the security of cable modems in general. The major
concern is that My roomate and I need to connect to the net at the same
time. Also we are online gamers and need a connection that will support
games like Everquest, Ultima Online, etc. for play over the internet. I
am using the Red Hat Distribution 5.1. If anyone has done a similar setup
I would like some giudance on which direction I should go.
Thanks in advance,
John
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Proxy Serving across Cable Modem
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:58:11 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============12358D5AD46BAD0009669B40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Go to my homepage and look in the firewall section. I am somewhat a firewall
newbie myself but I have lessons learned and some links to useful places if
you don't find your answer there.
home.hiwaay.net/~dmalcolm
Dan Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lindemuth wrote:
> I am looking to connect my home network to the internet through a TCI
>
> cablemodem. I have found documentation on how to connect the cable modem
>
> to the linux box and how to connect two network cards so that the linux
>
> box can serve the internet to my home Network. My questions is what type
>
> of connection should I use IP Masquerading, or proxy server with
>
> firewall. I would like to have the security of firewall since I have
>
> heard bad things about the security of cable modems in general. The major
>
> concern is that My roomate and I need to connect to the net at the same
>
> time. Also we are online gamers and need a connection that will support
>
> games like Everquest, Ultima Online, etc. for play over the internet. I
>
> am using the Red Hat Distribution 5.1. If anyone has done a similar setup
>
> I would like some giudance on which direction I should go.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> John
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
==============12358D5AD46BAD0009669B40
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="dmalcolm.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for dmalcolm
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dmalcolm.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Malcolm;Dan
tel;fax:256-895-9934
tel;home:256-772-3109
tel;work:256-722-2840
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Home
adr:;;1308 Nolan Court;Madison;AL;35758;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer/SysAdmin
x-mozilla-cpt:;25680
fn:Dan Malcolm
end:vcard
==============12358D5AD46BAD0009669B40==
------------------------------
From: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: VMware - wow!
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 06:38:25 GMT
"VMware products provide developers and users with the ability to:
Run multiple operating systems concurrently on a single PC--without
repartitioning or rebooting.
Interoperate among each of these operating systems.
Isolate and protect each operating environment, and the applications and
data that are running in it.
Encapsulate and manipulate each operating environment, and have the
availability to roll back and restart, or move an environment among
differently configured machines. "
www.vmware.com
------------------------------
From: Erwin Hogeweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: socket++ for linux
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 16:10:40 +0200
Hi,
Does somebody know where to find a linux port of socket++-1.11 (or
later)?
CU Erwin
------------------------------
From: Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.config,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Difficulty with eth0 after Sound Card setup
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:30:48 GMT
Hi there! I've run into a rather interesting problem.
I'm running Red Hat 5.2, and when I installed, I set up my NE2000
compliant NIC and had the network working perfectly. It's not in a PNP
mode, I had that problem already and fixed it, but something very odd
occured.
I noticed that the sound card had not been set up, I have a Yamaha OPL/SAx
sound card, and SNDCONFIG saw it and set everything up for me. Now,
however, I get a dreaded message when I boot or try to use my NIC:
Delaying eth0 initialization.
I'm not certian where to look or what to look for.
Any suggestions?
Hatton Humphrey
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Customer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth interface permissions
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 10:32:30 -0400
Good morning.
I have a few Linux boxes set up as testbeds for some networking products. I
am using some packet generation/capture utilities on the Linux box to test
the network equipment. The problem is that in order to access the ethernet
interfaces directly, e.g., to turn on promiscuous mode or send an ethernet
packet, you need to be logged in as root. I would like to avoid running the
tests as root if possible. So does anybody know a way to change the
permissions on the ethernet interfaces so that any user can directly access
them?
Thanks.
-Eddie
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roger Plant)
Subject: Re: Getting Desperate... MTU problem win IP MASQ
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 06:59:50 GMT
On Sun, 8 Aug 1999 19:20:12 -0400, "Paul Dugas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, I've been tinkering with this one for over a month and have yet to come
>up with a viable solution. I've also yet to get an answer to a post so I
>guess I'm either in the wrong place or I'm having trouble explaining the
>problem. One more time...
>
>I've got a Linux machine (redhat 5.2) setup as my router/firewall/NAT for my
>home network. The outside connection is BellSouth's new FastAccess IFITL
>systems offering ADSL speeds but via PPP-over-Ethernet rather than
>traditional IP setup via DHCP. The result is that my outside connection is
>ppp0 rather than eth0. The internal interface is eth1 (if that matters).
>It appears the problem I am having is due to the MTU/MRU of 1492 on ppp0
>instead of the traditional 1500 and the problem of ICMP error messages of
>MTU discoveries not being returned to internal hosts through NAT.
>
>
>
Hi Paul,
I don't know if this will help, but at the IP masquerading home pages
some time ago, there was a lot of patches for 2.0.3x kernels, to fix a
bug in the IP-masquerading code that had something to do with MTU, and
MRU settings.
Regards
Roger
===========================================================
Roger Plant :-) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
From: Gustin Kiffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Link with a Netware LAN
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:35:23 GMT
[posted and mailed]
On your Linux machine make sure that IPX is either compiled
into the kernel or running as a module - 'lsmod' will tell
you if it's a loaded module, 'insmod ipx' will load it.
Then check the output of ifconfig to make sure ipx is
configured properly on the interface - one of the ifconfig
lines should look like this for your eth0 interface:
IPX/Ethernet II addr:00000BA5:00AA003B356F
Make sure that the frame type (the part after 'IPX/') matches
the frame type on your server (use your Win95 setup to check
if you're not sure). Make sure the net address (the part
right after 'addr:')matches your server external net address. Keep
checking the entries in /proc/net/ipx* to make sure you have things
right.
If not, then as root say 'ipx_configure --auto_interface=on --
auto_primary=on' and see if that gets your interface configured
properly. After a minute or so 'slist' should show you your server
names. If not do 'ipx_interface delall' and try again manually using
'ipx_interface', putting in the proper frame type, net address, etc.
Then once you see the servers using 'slist' or 'nwsfind' then ncpmount
should mount your server's drives on whatever subdirectory you choose,
as in 'ncpmount -S yourservername -U yourNetwareloginname -P
yourpassword /mnt/yourmountpoint'.
Check metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/IPX-HOWTO for more details.
Luiz Guilherme B Damiano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to connect one computer using Linux with my Novell LAN. I
> configured the LAN card (it's a NetGear FA310TX) that is working well
> when the computer is running Windows 95 (I have the 2 OS installed)
and
> the IPX protocol is set to auto configuration. The Tulip.c module is
> working, but I do not know how to do to get access to my Netware
Server.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Jonathan Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Abdullah & Jessie (and any one else)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:45:25 GMT
Just thought I'd let you know that I got back into Linux. No one answerd my
post about what "cloning" in fsck meant, so I took the plunge and told it
yes.
Sorry about those other posts. I sent the first one from Windows last night,
and when I checked this morning, it wasn't here. Maybe I didn't refresh the
list correctly.
I don't like the Netscape or K newsreaders at all. I can't find my old posts
in them.
Well, I'm going to download those updates from Mandrake, and this time I'm
not going to cancel it. I still don't know what happend to the message I
tried to post from Linux.
More tomarrow. Maybe It'll be from Linux. Do y'all know of any news readers
that are more like Outlook Express? I'd like to be able to see the posts in
a directory tree like Outlook's.
Later,
JW
------------------------------
From: "John F. McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ports used for instant messenger
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 15:20:19 +0000
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
==============ms1974A57AA84AA83F5CC7CC2F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"John F. McClure" wrote:
> I'm attempting to shutdown instant messenger for
> our network. What ports should I close?
>
> TIA
>
> -- John
Never mind... I got it. port 5190
-- John
==============ms1974A57AA84AA83F5CC7CC2F
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature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==
==============ms1974A57AA84AA83F5CC7CC2F==
------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problems to get crossover ethernet connection
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:37:04 +0200
Hi,
I am new to the Linux world and I have been trying to connect my
Performa 6300 to my Linux box (RH 5.2) using netatalk
(netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.3-6.i386.rpm) and a crossed RJ-45 cable. The
ethernet device is correctly configured on the Linux box but on the
Macintosh, I get the following message each time I boot:
"SNMP MacAgent is set to off.
==> Failed to initialize UDP."
Though the SNMP MacAgent control panel is installed, it is impossible
to turn AppleTalk on using the Ethernet
adapter on the Mac. I am using an Asant� LC card, I have installed the
drivers and it seems to be recognized by certain applications, namely
the troubleshooter software but not by others like ADLS.
The shell message for the "ifconfig" command returns that "collisions"
occured:
eth0
Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:EB:25:33
inet addr:10.0.0.5 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:32 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:64
collisions:544
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf600
Any helpful information would be of a great help,
Thanks
David
------------------------------
From: dmalcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ports used for instant messenger
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 10:25:54 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============B7F82BA70CE72A29E8ED7991
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
AOL Instant Messager uses port 5190 both tcp and udp.
Dan
"John F. McClure" wrote:
> I'm attempting to shutdown instant messenger for
> our network. What ports should I close?
>
> TIA
>
> -- John
==============B7F82BA70CE72A29E8ED7991
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="dmalcolm.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for dmalcolm
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dmalcolm.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Malcolm;Dan
tel;fax:256-895-9934
tel;home:256-772-3109
tel;work:256-722-2840
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Home
adr:;;1308 Nolan Court;Madison;AL;35758;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer/SysAdmin
x-mozilla-cpt:;25680
fn:Dan Malcolm
end:vcard
==============B7F82BA70CE72A29E8ED7991==
------------------------------
From: "Philipp Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: traffic control, ip prioriting
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:31:56 -0400
Hello
I'm using a linux pc as a router (ip masquerading) to access the internet.
Now I'd like to set some ips more prioritiy than other ones (to get faster
internet access to some ips). Does somebody know a tool?
Thanks for helping.
Phil
------------------------------
From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Link with a Netware LAN
Date: 13 Aug 1999 15:30:45 GMT
First, I'd make sure the Netgear is communicating using TCP/IP properly.
Then, make sure that you have installed Netware support and IPX networking.
Assuming Redhat 6.0?
First, to see if you may need to do more work, try:
ncpmount -S server -V sys myusername /mnt/floppy
If returns an error about no IPX interface found, you need to do some more
work to get this going. Otherwise, try using bindery login to access the
server.
To get the IPX interface to work:
ipx_configure --auto_primary=off
ipx_configure --auto_interface=off
ipx_interface delall
ipx_interface add -p eth0 802.2 0x12345678
In the last line, eth0=device your NIC is configured as (tr0 for token).
802.2 is the frame type (use 802.3 if on NetWare 3.11). 0x12345678 is the
IPX network number that your station is connected to. Hope this helps.
merky1
Luiz Guilherme B Damiano wrote:
> I'd like to connect one computer using Linux with my Novell LAN. I
> configured the LAN card (it's a NetGear FA310TX) that is working well
> when the computer is running Windows 95 (I have the 2 OS installed) and
> the IPX protocol is set to auto configuration. The Tulip.c module is
> working, but I do not know how to do to get access to my Netware Server.
>
> I'm just beginning in Linux world and any response will be appreciated,
>
>
>
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Paskal van Lomm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: THNKX!: Re: Can I see who is connecting??
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:07:30 +0200
Thanks for all reactions.
paskal
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
