Linux-Networking Digest #295, Volume #12         Fri, 20 Aug 99 00:13:40 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Need Help with Netgear NIC and Red Hat (George Torralba)
  Re: DSL  IP-address question (George Torralba)
  Ipfwadm forwarding UDP and TCP packets- how? ("DIM FUTURE")
  Re: Linux as seocondary DNS of a Microsoft primary DNS? ("Andrey Smirnov")
  Re: Setting up IP-Masq ("Scott Simpson")
  NIC problem continues ("Kevin Rosel")
  Re: 3C905B server performance problem (J. Scott Berg)
  Re: Samba's last stand! ("Hiawatha Bray")
  Re: Detecting duplicate IP addresses in Linux (Bryan Hackney)
  Re: ALSA (Kaz Kylheku)
  Re: How to convert mail?Using ("Andrey Smirnov")
  Re: Networking Woes (Rick Higgs)
  Re: Linux Internet Access Through Proxy Server ("Andrey Smirnov")
  Re: DNS & IP-Masq. ("Scott Simpson")
  Re: Appending a ext2 filesystem (George Torralba)
  Re: Routing a 2nd real IP addr on a home net ("Andrey Smirnov")
  what does MS dial up networking do that PPP doesn't ? (Cameron L. Spitzer)
  Re: [HELP] [RH6.0] PnP Ne2000 (Mark Presley)
  Re: Re:Linux as seocondary DNS of a Microsoft primary DNS? ("Andrey Smirnov")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Torralba)
Subject: Re: Need Help with Netgear NIC and Red Hat
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:15:56 GMT


Use the stock tulip.o.  It should work, but if u really wanna use the
files on the disk, do (from whereever u want the files)

cd wherever (or just cd)
mkdir netgear
cd netgear
mkdir /now
mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /now
cp /now/linux/* .
./cctulip

and that should be it.  copy the compiled tulip.o to ur
/modules/lib/... directory

George



On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:59:27 -0400, "TJBJr1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Sorry to be a bother, but I've made progress.  Please forgive my newbie ways
>but I'd like to get this Netgear FA310 NIC working with my Red Hat 6.  I
>wrote an email to Netgear and I will post it below.  The issue I have is the
>destination they have me copy the new tulip.c file to does not exist.  Nor
>do any of the "make" commands work when I created the directories and copied
>the file there.  I'm just slightly confused.  Any help would be awesome.  I
>knew I should have gone 3Com.  :-(
>
>---------------------
>
>Netgear Mail
>
>We do have the help file on the driver disk and if it isn't there it is
>on the new driver on our website.  Also, here is some help for the
>install.  Unfortunately, we do not have alot of support for Linux.
>
>Mount your floppy drive.
>Execute the following commands: (%floppy and %linux and %menuconfig
>%zlilomay vary)
>cp /%floppy/linux/tulip.c /usr/src/%linux/drivers/net/tulip.c
>cd /usr/src/%linux/
>make modules
>make
>make %menuconfig (or config or xconfig)
>choose to load the DEC Tulip family in the kernel
>make dep clean modules modules_install %zlilo
>shutdown -r 0
>
>I hope this helps.  This is basically the extent of our support.
>
>
>
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Torralba)
Subject: Re: DSL  IP-address question
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:15:20 GMT


Forget about using dhcp, assign ur eth0 a static 10.0.0.x IP, netmask
for 255.255.255.0, set gateway to 10.0.0.1 (the dsl modem), do "show
running" from cbos (enable mode) and that will give you ur DNS server
IP and that should be it.

George


On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:32:27 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
wrote:

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reid Mumford) writes:
>> I have been trying to configure my DSL connection to work under 
>> LINUX.  I am using Caldera 2.2.  I have configured my Cisco 675 
>> modem so that it is using DHCP and NAT and is also configured not 
>> to use the DOH (dial on hookup) stuff that is used under windows.  
>> My connection works fine under windows95 and i am quite pleased with
>> it.  However, i cannot get it to work under LINUX.  
>> I am using the windows command "winipcfg" to give me all of my network
>> information.  From this command i get my; IP-address, subnet mask,
>> default gateway, and DHCP server information.  
>> Are these numbers correct to use in linux?  
>> I recently installed Caldera 2.2 and i had no problem installing my
>> network card.  It seems like my problem is that i am using the wrong
>> IP-address.  
>> Is there a convenient way to find your IP settings under windows so
>> that you can use this information in LINUX?
>
>Big Assumption -> you're using uswest.net and the 675 has 10.x.x.x
>addresses on the inside interface.
>
>You can assign any 10.x.x.x address you want. The gotcha is the 675 is
>the default gateway at 10.0.0.1 and you will need to put the correct
>DNS servers in the /etc/resolv.conf. RedHat's networking tools will do
>this for you if you want. The 675 is acting very similar to an IP
>Masquerading firewall. You can get the DNS numbers from the 675, but
>I've not done this and don't remember how.
>
>
>Greg Weeks



------------------------------

From: "DIM FUTURE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ipfwadm forwarding UDP and TCP packets- how?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:05:48 -0700

read this in a FAQ, but I don't know how to do it, can anyone out there help
me out?
checked some FAQs but not sure what to make of them

-David-

"it does require that certain TCP & UDP ports be open for you to be able to
host or join outside of your local network. You will need to  open TCP & UDP
ports 47624 and 2300-2399 on the proxy server. "





------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as seocondary DNS of a Microsoft primary DNS?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:14:16 -0700

I'm just wondering in which way is the DNS server incomplete?

Raymonds Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes this should work.
> I only run it the otherway around since the NT DNS server is incomplete
and is
> not stable enough. Sometimes the service just dies.
>
> Raymond
>
> Rui Mendes wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to configure my DNS (running with BIND and LINUX RedHat
> > 6.0)secondary for a domain whos primary DNS is running under Microsoft.
> > I tried to configure my named.conf file, but it doesn't work.
> >
> > My question is: Is it possible to have a Linux DNS secondary for a
Microsoft
> > DNS?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Rui
>




------------------------------

From: "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up IP-Masq
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:43:42 -0700


LightSeeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I am having trouble with setting up a Redhat 5.2 (2.0.36) box with ip-masq
> via modem and ethernet.  So far I am having early trouble with ppp0
setting

Biggest problem on the net. See http://home.earthlink.net/~simpson3.





------------------------------

From: "Kevin Rosel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIC problem continues
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:39:39 -0400

Problem:  I can't use my NIC card when I boot into Linux.
Setup:  I am using a PRO120 100/10 Mbps PCI Bus Fast Ethernet Adapter,
although the file to install the Linux driver is called  tulip. My pc is
dual boots between 98 and Linux. I then connect up to a 98 box and share the
Internet connection using Sygate.
Everything works find under 98.  When I reboot I notice that the link light
is on while in 98, while booting, while Linix is starting.  When it gets to
the Eth0 check, the link light goes out and nothing I have tried gets it
working.  I have ran ifconfig and all the IP/subnet info is right and
everything else looks normal.  I can ping the loopback and the nic IP but
still no link light.  I have run the ifconfig media type command to make
sure it's using ethernet.
It seems obvious to me that it is a software problem, since the link light
is ok during the Linux boot up to the ethernet check.  I have tried to
install the Linux driver, but I'm not sure if it has worked.  Seems you have
to almost be a programmer to install a driver in Linux (guess that will keep
it off the average users desktop for awhile).
Is an incorrect driver the only thing that would keep the link light from
working?  Seems like that is a physical layer operation that shouldn't be
effected by software.

Kevin





------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. Scott Berg)
Subject: Re: 3C905B server performance problem
Date: 18 Aug 1999 13:51:17 GMT

In article <7pc79i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
sjm  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>The problem we're seeing is that the performance on the 3C905B degrades
>quickly over time under constant load.  Ping times start out very good
>-- around 15ms.  But they increase over the course of about two hours,
>until ping times are up to 10000ms or more, HORRIBLE performance.
>Packet loss is almost none, and I'm getting no frame or dropped packet
>errors -- only the ping time is increasing and throughput drops to
>under 2kbps.

The other poster's suggestion may be the fix, but be aware that there
are also some TCP related problems in 2.2.11 and they may be there in
2.2.10 as well.  2.2.12 should fix them (and will be out in a couple
of days most likely), and the 2.2.12-pre (or -ac?)  versions have the
fix in them already.


------------------------------

From: "Hiawatha Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba's last stand!
Date: 19 Aug 1999 19:47:20 PDT

Curiouser and curiouser...

I still can't get Samba to work right, but I think I'm making progress.  I
just changed a line in smb.conf from security = user to security = share.
Suddenly, I can get into the Linux machine from the PC.  But what I get is a
single file folder that I can't open.  This folder has the same user name as
my PC; I created a user account on the Linux box with the same user name,
thinking that might help.  Anyway, when I click on the folder, it says "The
share name was not found.  Be sure you typed it correctly."

Weird...again I appeal for help.  Thanks.



------------------------------

From: Bryan Hackney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Detecting duplicate IP addresses in Linux
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:02:28 -0500

epadin wrote:
> 
> A while ago I posted a message regarding duplicate IP address
> detecting. I was kinda miffed at the fact that win boxen could do this
> (at boot up) but there seemed to be no facility in Linux. I finally
> found a (rather obvious) solution and thought I would post it to the
> group so that others can find a ready answer.
> 
[...]

Here's a way to check the whole network. Run the script at intervals and
do diffs between the files.

#!/bin/sh

export PATH=$PATH:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin

cd /root/pinger

N=2
while [ "$N" != "255" ]; do
        arp -d 10.20.30.$N > /dev/null 2>&1
        N=`echo $N + 1 | bc`
done
N=2
while [ "$N" != "255" ]; do
        ping -c 1 10.20.30.$N > /dev/null 2>&1 &
        N=`echo $N + 1 | bc`
done

sleep 5

arp -an | \
awk 'BEGIN {\
        FS=".";\
}\
{\
        print $1, $2, $3, $4, $5;\
}' | sort +4n > arptab
cp arptab arptab.`date +%m%d%y%H%M%S`




-- 
Bryan Hackney / BHC / bhackneyatexpress-news.net
================================================
\\\\     \\\\     \\//     \\\\     \\\\
 - -      - o      O O      o o      - -
  >        >        >        >        >
  -        -        O        -        -

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: ALSA
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:03:45 GMT

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:06:02 +0300, Timo Tossavainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:56:46 +0300, Timo Tossavainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Use the ALSA drivers:
>> >
>> >http://www.alsa-project.org
>> >
>> >worked for me and it's free (and better); a bit hard to setup for a newbie
>> >perhaps. Cracking is stealing; the author of a piece of software has every
>> >right to ask money for it and you have the right to not use it.
>>
>> Does the author also have a right to engage into agreements with manufacturers
>> who are then reluctant to release hardware specs to freeware competitors?
>
>It is perhaps unethical, but I don't see why not. The consumers should use
>their power and boycott the manufacturers that don't release hw specs. Too bad

The problem is that most consumers use MS Windows and get ``free'' drivers with
the purchase of their card, and don't give a hoot about HW specs, the
availability of which affects only users of operating systems they don't even
know about.

------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to convert mail?Using
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:01:50 -0700

More info needed!

What is Exchange format? And if it's Exchange,  than it can't be running on
Novell (only on NT)?



Peeter Beckers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> Using Netscape under Linux  I can't read my mail from a Novell server in
> exchange-fomat.
> Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
>
> Greetings,
> Peeter Beckers
>




------------------------------

From: Rick Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking Woes
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:16:58 -0500

Yes, I'm using the HWaddr from ifconfig -a as the MAC address.
I know that LINUX is changing this because I checked the MAC addresses with
Win95 that the boxes shipped with and then checked it after installing RH
6.0.
On four identical boxes, the MAC addresses were all different before
installing RH6.0 and after the install they were all the same (again, using
ifconfig -a).
SuSe 6.1 installs did the same as RH 6.0.
A 3Com 3C509B card in the same boxes does not exhibit this behavior.

Rick Higgs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Peter Buelow wrote:

> Rick Higgs wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone encountered the following problem:
> >
> > New Compaq 500 MHz PIII system with RH6.0 installed.  RH6.0 overwrites
> > the MAC address for the Intel EEPro 100+ network card.  I've installed
> > RH6.0 on 4
> > such machines and in all cases it overwrites the card's original MAC
> > address to the same address for all 4 machines.  RH says this is
> > impossible.
>   this is interesting as the MAC address is built into the card. It is a
> unique ID seperate from the IP address. Make sure you have your address
> names correct. If you do ifconfig, you see something like this.
>
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:04:6D:15:54
>           inet addr:192.168.0.1  Bcast:192.168.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:16205 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:28836 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:1351 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:9 Base address:0xf880
>
>   Where HWaddr is the MAC address of the card. This can't (shouldn't is
> probably a better word, but most cards put this in firmware) be
> overwritten.
>
> And how do you know that the MAC address is being overwritten? Put up
> some ifconfig stuff and then do a 'dmesg | grep eth0' or just a 'dmesg'
> and put up the eth0 startup stuff. Also, triple check you have the right
> driver defined in the kernel. If the driver is off, certain info may get
> obtained wrong by a mistaken driver resulting in the wrong information
> being displayed. Good luck.
> --
> Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
> --
> "Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
> referred to a "pointer to void."




------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Internet Access Through Proxy Server
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:50:53 -0700

If you can ping Internet machines from command line, than why do yo need
proxy?


Doug Thews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7pcq71$hls$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am having trouble configuring Netscape (or anything else) to work
through
> our proxy server (MS Proxy 2.0).  I configured Netscape to point to the
> proxy server (as I did for all of the other Win95 machines - which works
> fine).  But, I get an error message stating that the automated proxy
script
> was not recognized.  When I try to do this manually, I get an error
message
> stating that the host name is not found.
>
> I can ping internal and external IP addresses from a command shell, and I
> can also resolve names through the internal and external DNS.  But, I
cannot
> HTTP (or anything else IP related) outside of the proxy server.
>
> Does anyone have a setup script for connecting Redhat 6.0 through MS Proxy
> Server?
>
> --
> Doug Thews
> Director, Client Solutions
> D&D Consulting Services
>
>
>
>




------------------------------

From: "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS & IP-Masq.
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:40:07 -0700


Stephen Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm in the same situation. I'm trying to setup a masquerading dail out
> server. The plan is to surf the web through one machine which connects

For masquerading on a dial out server, see
http://home.earthlink.net/~simpson3/firewall_setup.htm.





------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Torralba)
Subject: Re: Appending a ext2 filesystem
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:01:45 GMT


Load Windows and run partition magic. :-)

George

(seriously, don't even know if PQ supports ext2)

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:27:16 +0200, Magnus Svensson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Gee... can't you try to remember a little harder... :)
>
>Seriously, if anyone can name these tools, I'll be eternally grateful. :)
>
>
>/Magnus Svensson
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Raymonds Doetjes wrote:
>>His question was howto span ext2 volumes.
>>I would like to know this asswell you know how.
>>
>>I know that there are certain tools but I can't remember their names. If you
>>have that tools you can cluster the inode tables together to make 1 big
>>volume



------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing a 2nd real IP addr on a home net
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 23:34:41 -0700

I think you need to get a new IP address from a different subnet (actually
you will need two addresses!). Then install another NIC (assign one of the
new addresses to it) in Linux firewall and create so called DMZ
(demilitarized zone).

Internet
     I
Linux-->DMZ (machine with real ip)
    I
Internal
Network

But you need to make sure that your ISP sends all the traffic directed to
the DMZ host to your first (external) real address.

Good luck!

Tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7pevgg$cg0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> < If this message appeared already.. my apologies.  I think it got
> eaten, I waited a good 3 hours to be sure... >
>
> Okay, here's a situation that's not so common... There's a lot of
> background here, the question is relatively short (see the bottom.)
>
> Existing setup:  Cablemodem to linux server (with valid external IP
> addr), which masquerades for 3 internal hosts on a 10.0.0.0 network.
>
>                 cablemodem
>                     |         (external X.Y.Z.A)
>                    NIC1
>                   server
>                    NIC2
>                   /   \       (10.0.0.0)
>                comp1  comp2 ....
>
> I want to purchase an additional IP address from my ISP, for use on one
> of the internal hosts.  (Preferably, any single one at a given time.)
>
> The described setup provided by the ISP for 2 IP addr's at one house is
> this:
>
>                 cablemodem
>                     |
>                    hub
>                   /   \
>                comp1  comp2
>                IP#1   IP#2
>
> This implies that the cablemodem broadcasts everything it hears on the
> cable network onto the local ethernet.  comp1 and comp2, configured
> properly, listen for datagrams destined for each of their IP addresses,
> similarly they send datagrams originating from their IP addresses.
>
> Problem: I want to leave the topology the same: CM through server to
> internal hosts.  I want to masquerade for 2 boxes on the 10.0.0.0 net,
> and simply forward (incoming and outgoing) for whichever box is
> configured to use the new, provided IP address.
>
> Complication: While I can grasp the forwarding rules, in general, my
> understanding falls short with respect to whether packets must be
> addressed to gateways.
> - I want the server to forward packets destined for the *specific IP
> address* from the crossover from the cablemodem to the internal network.
>  However, this IP address may not be on the same subnet.  Nor does any
> outside router know to send it to the server as a gateway.
>
> Question: Can this linux server (2.0.3x kernel) be configured so that it
> will listen for packets destined for this new IP address, and forward
> them onto the local network, nomatter whether it is in a different
> subnet, nor if this packet is being routed directly to that IP, without
> being sent to the server as a gateway?  Anything I should be aware of?
> Does this behaviour take place automatically if the forwarding rules are
> set up on the server?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --Chris
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cameron L. Spitzer)
Subject: what does MS dial up networking do that PPP doesn't ?
Date: 19 Aug 1999 16:15:56 GMT


I've got a couple of accounts now where I can connect with
MS Windows-98's Dial Up Adapter, but not with pppd and chat.

DUA, of course, works mysteriously.  You give it a phone number
to call and a user account name and password, and it automatically
dials the modem, connects, establishes IP connectivity, and
installs a default gateway and DNS.

I can call these same numbers with chat and pppd.  Chat gets as
far as sending a password, and then the far end just sits there
waiting for some kind of prompt from my end.  If the chat script
ends at that point, I get "serial connection established"
and pppd sends its six LCP requests, and there is no answer
back at all.  Then it gives up and dies.

One of these guys told me he has an old Shiva terminal concentrator
and I am logging into a "Novell Prompt" what ever that is.
He doesn't have any idea what MS DUA says to convince Novell Prompt
to give a PPP connection.   The other guy just says it works with
MS DUA and he can't afford to support anything else.

I have to connect to these systems for work.  If it were my choice
I'd just seek IP connectivity elsewhere.  so dont' even go there.

So I suspect there is more to Dial Up Adapter than a PPP daemon.
And whatever it is, I know how to write a chat script and I'd be glad
to document the answer and try to get it into the PPP HOWTO.

Does anyone know what DUA does that pppd doesn't?

Cameron



------------------------------

From: Mark Presley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: [HELP] [RH6.0] PnP Ne2000
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:09:16 -0700

I had to set my ne2000 (16bit) to an I/O 0f 300 before it would be detected.
If your using a PCI card that will not be an option.
-Mark

Matt Cole wrote:

> I have a similar card (PnP NE2000).  The kernel claimed to see it when it
> booted up, but ifconfig couldn't configure it.  Let me know if you find
> anything out.
>
> Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:
>
> > I've installed a Redhat 6.0 over the network (ftp from redhat's site),
> > and the install program would not find the NIC in my machine (PnP Ne2k).
> >
> > I had to borrow a card from another machine (non-PnP Ne2k), and
> > installing
> > went rather fine.
> >
> > I'd like to switch back to my usual card (the PnP one). I have no idea
> > how to get it to work.
> > My BIOS tells me it's configured on IRQ 10, my other OS (BeOS) uses it
> > on IRQ 3, port 0x240. How can I know how it is configured under linux,
> > and in which network config file do I have to report this config?
> >
> > Please be aware that I haven't used any version of linux for the last
> > 18 months, and that my previous install was a slackware 3.5 (IIRC) with
> > a monolithic kernel 2.0.x. I also don't have X really running yet
> > (it's only doing 320x200)
> >
> > Thanks for answering by e-mail.
>
> --
> "So Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is
> dumb."
>  -- Dark Helmet (Rick Moranis), "Spaceballs"



------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re:Linux as seocondary DNS of a Microsoft primary DNS?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:59:36 -0700

It's possible. If you post content of youe named.conf file, we might be able
to help you.

Good luck!

Rui Mendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I would like to configure my DNS (running with BIND and LINUX RedHat
> 6.0)secondary for a domain whos primary DNS is running under Microsoft.
> I tried to configure my named.conf file, but it doesn't work.
>
> My question is: Is it possible to have a Linux DNS secondary for a
Microsoft
> DNS?
>
> Regards
>
> Rui
>
>




------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to