Linux-Networking Digest #342, Volume #12 Tue, 24 Aug 99 05:13:36 EDT
Contents:
How do you get Linux to recognize the Cisco 605??? ("User")
Re: RH6 & EtherJet IO/IRQ/DMA? ("PsychoTron")
Mirroring through a socks server (Eric Leroy)
Linux server backup of 95/NT clients? (Steve Ledford)
Re: How to configure a Gateway on Redhat5.2? ("Scott Simpson")
Re: BeOS Question (Heeeeeeeez back!)
3com3c509 & RH6.0 (Melvin Toy)
Lazy DNS (Eric Leroy)
Re: SPARCclassic X Terminal with KDE and Linux (Chris Leach)
Re: How do you create a hard link? (Linux Lover)
SMTP Server Problem ("sago")
Auto proxy configuration with Apache (Steven Sykes)
SMTP Server Problem ("sago")
Re: How do you create a hard link? (Prasanth Kumar)
Re: dhcp apache & dynamic DNS (Chris)
Compile Kernel with ROOT NFS support... - fail ("Barrow Kwan")
Re: realtek problem (Maurizio Cimaschi)
Re: nfsd problems (Maurizio Cimaschi)
IP MASQ and Squid (William Lessard)
Re: 3com3c509 & RH6.0 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= COTTALORDA)
Re: small company IMAP email planning: best way? (Johannes Niess)
Re: IP Masquerading Challenge ("Graham Fountain")
QUESTION: why does in.identd keep running?!!!! (General Sisyphus)
Re: Help.... Selectively disaling Masq (Chris Anderson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do you get Linux to recognize the Cisco 605???
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:56:42 -0500
Hello,
I am a newbie to Linux. I was running win98, but decided to switch over to
Linux. I have a USWest DSL connection using a cisco 605. I was wondering
if anybody in this newsgroup knows how to setup up the cisco 605 in Linux.
I have no clue on what to do in Linux. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. I am running Mandrake Linux 6.0...........I think it's also
called Venus, or something like that.
Thanks,
Nong Khai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "PsychoTron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: RH6 & EtherJet IO/IRQ/DMA?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:56:15 -0400
Are you trying to setup this net card on eth0? If not, that's your problem.
I know with my net card (Linksys), Linux auto-detects the card's settings.
You might wanna try setting up the card using the ne driver too.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a PCMCIA EtherJet card, and can't get it to initialize.
>
> The card lists from "cardctl ident", but won't configure - I think it is
> because I don't have the correct i/o / irq.
>
> Windows 98 (ugh!) says that it is i/o 0x1014 IRQ 7, but these don't work.
>
> Is there anyway to find out what the correct i/o and irq is in Linux.
>
> Thanks
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Eric Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mirroring through a socks server
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:10:37 -0700
Hi,
I have to go through a socks proxy server, and I am desperately looking
for a mirroring tool.
I managed to have rftp working, so I know my connection/config is ok but
I can't find any socksified mirroring program.
With a standard config, I was using fmirror which was working great. The
source is available and doesn't look too big. Could anyone please help
me to compile it to work through that socks server?
Thanks,
Sfo
------------------------------
From: Steve Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux server backup of 95/NT clients?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:58:59 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking for a backup server package running on Linux that can
backup up a Win95/98/NT machine. Now the clincher, doing this across the
Internet. Therefore, schemes such as Samba mounting won't work, or other
things that depend on permanent, fixed IP addresses of the machine to be
backed up, etc. You get the drift.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to configure a Gateway on Redhat5.2?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:50:08 -0700
Parag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> We have a 25 m/c network with Linux RH5.2 being the samba server m/c and
> other m/cs are Win95/NT. Linux box is directly connected to internet
> via ISP. I want to setup a gateway on Linux m/c so that all other
> Win95/Nt m/c will have direct access to Internet. How should this be
> done? I need detail description. Please reply this post or directly mail
> me on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See http://home.earthlink.net/~simpson3/
------------------------------
From: Heeeeeeeez back! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: BeOS Question
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:43:57 +0100
Helge Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Content-Type: image/gif
> Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\nsmailNB.gif"
> R0lGODlhIANYAvcAAP+Y/5hmmMuYy3d0d5hmywAA/wAAswAAmgAAgQAAaQAAUAAANwAAHjMz
Excuse me, but could you get a clue please.
This is a text newsgroup for Linux, not some windows binary drop off point.
This is the second binary I've seen here in as many days.
Sod off until you learn how to post properly!
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
==============================================================================
|GCv3.12 GCS>$ d-(dpu) s+/- a C++ US++ P L/L+ E-- W+ N++ o+ K PS+ w-- M+/++ |
|PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ X+/X++ R+ tv+ b+ DI+ D+ G e++ h/h+ !r!| Space for hire |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: Melvin Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3com3c509 & RH6.0
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:29:00 GMT
My nic card always fails during boot. I have to manually activate. After
that my network connection is fine. Anyone know why? I never had this
problem with RH5.0
Melvin
------------------------------
From: Eric Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lazy DNS
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:15:20 -0700
My DNS servers timeout once every two requests, weird.
If I start a request and stop it right away, the second request comes
immediately.
Any idea?
---
Sfo
------------------------------
From: Chris Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: SPARCclassic X Terminal with KDE and Linux
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:03:38 +1000
Wolfgang Ganzert wrote:
> I am interested in using a SPARCclassic (Sun) X-Terminal runing KDE (and
> Redhat Linux).
>
> Now we would like to use the xterminals in such a manner that the window
> manager KWM from the KDE package is running on the terminal itself (on
> the local cpu of the terminal) and not on the host, since the host is to
> slow to feed all the connected terminals with the window manager data.
> What do I have to do in order to achieve this?
>
> TFTP and BOOTP on the server is running.
>
> Is it necessary to run a "small" Linux kernel on the terminal cpu (maybe
> the tftp.img boot image from the distribution) in order to set the KDW
> ontop of it?
>
To run linux and linux KDE on the XTerminal you will need to set the
Xterminal
boot up as a diskless station. So boot the tftp.img from the
distribution and
nfs mount a root containing enough to run X and KDE.
It may also be possible to build a version of the KDE wm that can be
load in
much the same way as running local olwm/mwm.
Or as already suggested install a SCSI disk and load linux locally.
- Chris
------------------------------
From: Linux Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: How do you create a hard link?
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:43:05 -0700
a hardlink is just a regular filename (internally, Unix creates an
i-node, which is a data structure that points to the actual file, thus
the link terminology).
Matt wrote:
> How do you create a hard link as opposed to a symlink? What is the
> difference?
------------------------------
From: "sago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMTP Server Problem
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:05 -0400
I am trying a linux box for SMTP. Its running sendmail. Internal mails are
working fine. It can send mails to the internet but it cant receive any
mails. e.g If I send a mail from hotmail.com to this server I am trying the
mail comes back saying :
________________________________________________
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hotmail.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
205.142.28.17 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... this site does not relay
Giving up on 205.142.28.17.
_________________________________________________
abc.com is my domain with a fixed IP and 205.142.28.17 is the mail server
of my upstream provider. N.B. Domain names are changed for privacy purpose
but assume that user xyz exist in domain abc.com
MX entries in there at DNS server of service provider for mail.abc.com
with preference 10 and preference 30 for 205.142.28.17 ( my service
provider) . mail is the name of my host.
>From some other host, if I try /usr/lib/sendmail -t -v to send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it gives error saying :
___________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Connecting to mail.abc.com. via esmtp...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Deferred: Connection refused by mail.abc.com
___________________________________________________
Looks like my server is not accepting the SMTP connection and thus try for
my service provider ( 205.142.28.17) whose preference is 30.. as in the case
of the hotmail error message.
Is the problem with my service provider or my server. Does my server need to
relay to recieve mails. How do you make a linux server relay ? My server is
definetly running sendmail at port 25 as deamon .
Can anybody tell me whats happening ????
Sagolsem C
------------------------------
From: Steven Sykes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Auto proxy configuration with Apache
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:12:37 +1200
Hi everyone,
I'd like to be able to use Netscape's auto configuration feature for
resolving proxy details via a URL that points to my Apache server.
Looking in the Apache docs didn't turn up anything, how do I do this?
Cheers,
--
Steven
Webmaster of WACC - Wellington Acorn Computer Club
WACC pages: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~pbrowne/WACC/
Phone: (03) 358-5601 or (025) 908-448
My pages: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~acorn/
... He's a potato Jim!, Let's gouge out all of his eyes
------------------------------
From: "sago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMTP Server Problem
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:09:21 -0400
I am trying a linux box for SMTP. Its running sendmail. Internal mails are
working fine. It can send mails to the internet but it cant receive any
mails. e.g If I send a mail from hotmail.com to this server I am trying the
mail comes back saying :
________________________________________________
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at hotmail.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
205.142.28.17 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... this site does not relay
Giving up on 205.142.28.17.
_________________________________________________
abc.com is my domain with a fixed IP and 205.142.28.17 is the mail server
of my upstream provider. N.B. Domain names are changed for privacy purpose
but assume that user xyz exist in domain abc.com
MX entries in there at DNS server of service provider for mail.abc.com
with preference 10 and preference 30 for 205.142.28.17 ( my service
provider) . mail is the name of my host.
>From some other host, if I try /usr/lib/sendmail -t -v to send a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it gives error saying :
___________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Connecting to mail.abc.com. via esmtp...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Deferred: Connection refused by mail.abc.com
___________________________________________________
Looks like my server is not accepting the SMTP connection and thus try for
my service provider ( 205.142.28.17) whose preference is 30.. as in the case
of the hotmail error message.
Is the problem with my service provider or my server. Does my server need to
relay to recieve mails. How do you make a linux server relay ? My server is
definetly running sendmail at port 25 as deamon .
Can anybody tell me whats happening ????
Sagolsem C
------------------------------
From: Prasanth Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: How do you create a hard link?
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:17:02 GMT
Linux Lover wrote:
>
> a hardlink is just a regular filename (internally, Unix creates an
> i-node, which is a data structure that points to the actual file, thus
> the link terminology).
>
> Matt wrote:
>
> > How do you create a hard link as opposed to a symlink? What is the
> > difference?
Hardlink is as folows:
ln oldname newname
Symlink is as follows:
ln -s oldname newname
Difference is that hardlinks cannot go across partitions while symlinks
can.
Also when you remove the original file, it still exists if you use a
hardlink
while you get a broken symlink. This is because hardlinks are kind of an
alias
to the same file content and indistinguishable from the original file
name.
--
Prasanth Kumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: dhcp apache & dynamic DNS
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:26:00 GMT
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:28:43 GMT, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
comp.os.linux.networking:
>I have a dynamic dns setup and im wondering if its possible
>to set up apache to virtually have separate domains
>my isp is a cable modem which uses dhcp so
>i dont have a static ip
It's not currently possible in the way you are suggesting because Apache
requires a fixed IP in order to support virtual hosting by name. It's a
silly restriction if you ask me. The workaround is to use mod_rewrite to
parse and transparently modify the incoming URLs.
See the documentation page at http://www.apache.org/docs/vhosts/mass.html
for examples.
------------------------------
From: "Barrow Kwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,net.computers.os.unix.linux
Subject: Compile Kernel with ROOT NFS support... - fail
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:12:21 -0700
I cannot compile the kernel with NFS root support....
I put
CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y in the config file, but can't compile
I am using RedHat 6.0...
any idea??
------------------------------
From: Maurizio Cimaschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: realtek problem
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:22:37 +0159
Gaudibri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed Red Hat 5.2 on my computer with an old ISA Ethernet realtek
> 8019 inside.
> The problem is that Linux always finds it busy and does not want to activate
> it. The only thing that is working is the loopback device.
Have you already disabled the PnP features ????
There should be a DOS utility to make it works like a Ne2000 clone with no
PnP features.
--
Saluti, Maurizio.
------------------------------
From: Maurizio Cimaschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nfsd problems
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:18:24 +0159
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems installing the nfsd module. I am working with Red Hat
> 6.0, Kernel 2.2.5
I had no problem with stock kernel (2.2.5-15)
> At bootup I get the message
> nfssvc: Function not implemented
Got the same with 2.2.11
Read the kernel section at http://lwn.net/, there's some news about
patches to apply to knfsd to make work fine, haven't tryed yet.
--
Saluti, Maurizio.
------------------------------
From: William Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.net.masquerade
Subject: IP MASQ and Squid
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:09:08 -0700
Excuse the wording but im a newbie to Linux.
Running RH6.0 with cable modem. Trying to convert from NT server for
many years to Linux. Yes i have seen the light. But anyway. Have
configured squid on port 8080. win machines can go out. but email, icq,
newsgroups etc. wont go. using ipchains i set up with accept all just
to open everything up. and they still wont work. on win machines
entered ip address .nmask and gw but have not put dns servers from
external network. the only thing that does work is web browsing. any
help would greatly appreciated.
If possible could you please email me.
Thanks,
William
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= COTTALORDA
Subject: Re: 3com3c509 & RH6.0
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:51:39 +0200
Hi,
I use to have this problem too.
I note that I didn't activate network script during boot.
You can check that with linuxconf (Start/Stop Program). Verify that you have
network and inet started.
Hope this helps.
S�bastien
Melvin Toy a �crit :
> My nic card always fails during boot. I have to manually activate. After
> that my network connection is fine. Anyone know why? I never had this
> problem with RH5.0
>
> Melvin
------------------------------
From: Johannes Niess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: small company IMAP email planning: best way?
Date: 24 Aug 1999 09:40:19 +0300
Matt,
This looks like a good scenario. But might be some additional security
issues: Disable all unused daemons, put tcp wrapper around the others
and consider using ssh instead of telnet for management.
matt shobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to set up a RedHat 6.0 system running the default IMAP server
> for small corporate email use (~120 users). I'd simply like a little
> reinforcement that my approach to setting up user accounts on this
> machine is a good one. The following conditions apply to the user group
> in question:
>
> - none ever expect to use telnet or require shell access; email is
> their only application
Disable telnetd or set the standard shell to /bin/false.
> - all will access from Windows 9x boxes, using OUtlook Express or
> COmmunicator 4.6 as their IMAP client
> - only the administrator and one other supervisor expect to manage user
> accounts and other system properties
>
> With this in mind, is the following approach to a freshly installed
> system the best, or am I missing something:
>
> 1) Install IMAP RPM and get it going, and configure MX pointer for DNS
> to point to this machine.
>
> 1.5) Leave all other file settings and permissions in the system at
> install default (again, RedHat 6.0)
Most services are _enabled_ if installed.
>
> 2) Create all the user accounts with KDE User Manager or some other
> script, assigning each mail user to GID 100 (users). Also, figure out
> some secure process by which users update their shell passwords (web-
> based?) so their accounts are secure
A nice way might be using samba with encrypted passwords. This way
users can change their windows login password to change their mail
password. Samba can relay authentication requests to your NT server
(which will be replaced by samba sooner or later).
>
> 3) Assign the two administrators additional group access to the
> group 'adm'
>
> This should allow all ~120 new users to have immediate IMAP inbox
> access, once their passwords are set. This seems like a very common
> task, although no FAQ or How-To discussed it specifically. Is there
> another published resource I should locate for LINUX-solely-as-mail-
> server best practices?
>
> Thanks gurus,
>
> --
> Matt Shobe
> Burning Door LLC - http://www.burningdoor.com
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Graham Fountain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading Challenge
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:07:47 +1000
Maybe your /etc/hosts.allow or /etc/hosts.deny files are causing the
problem. Thats about the only reason I can think of why the others can't
ping the linux box.
How did you call ipchains to start the masquerading? Did you use
192.168.1.0/24 or 192.168.1.2/32 ? The latter will only allow masquerading
from the .2 box (but this shouldn't stop pinging from working). Maybe your
destination address is wrong, and causing it to trap the ping, and try to
masquerade it over the internet. Do you have any other ipchains rules that
might cause it to only accept packets from 192.168.1.2? This is probably not
much help, but it might give you somewhere to start looking.
I dunno why, but every now and then some of my workstations can't even ping
the linux box, but they can ping each other. At the same time other
machines can ping the linux box. And then for no apparent reason they just
start working. Wierdness!!!
agent seven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ps3c3$ep1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings!
>
> I know that the IP Masquerading issue has been beaten to a pulp, but
> after browsing the newsgroups all weekend long and having no fewer than
> four people over to my house to try and help me figure things out - all
> to no avail, I am acquiescing and posting here, in hopes that you guys
> can help me out.
>
> Here's my situation:
>
> I'm running RedHat 6 at home as a firewall running IP Masquerading.
> Until this weekend, I had only one other machine on this network, a
> Windows 95 box set to 192.168.1.2. My little network has worked
> flawlessly for quite a few months this way.
>
> I want to start learning how to use NT (it will help my situation at
> work), so this weekend I installed NT on a machine, configured it to
> 192.168.1.3 and hooked it up. It didn't work. After a number of hours
> of struggling, I decided to hook up my one other machine (another
> Windows 95 box), figuring maybe I just didn't know what I was doing
> with NT.
>
> I configured the fourth machine at 192.168.1.4 (all other settings
> identical to the 1.2 box, which is working). It didn't work either.
>
> All of my Windows machines (including the NT box) can ping each other.
> Only one machine, however, can ping the Linux box - the 1.2 machine
> that is working. I'm at my wits end. HELP!
>
> Here is what the entry in my rc.local looks like:
>
> ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> /sbin/depmod -a
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_vdolive
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_autofw
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_mfw
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_portfw
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_quake
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_user
>
> ipchains -P forward DENY
> ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQ
>
> His what my netstat -r says:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
> irtt Iface
> 24.6.163.155 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0
> 0 eth0
> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 0 eth1
> 24.6.162.0 * 255.255.254.0 U 0 0
> 0 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
> 0 lo
> default 24.6.162.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
> 0 eth0
>
> I'd show you my "route prints" from DOS, but I'm not at home right now.
> Suffice to say that I have compared all three, and they are all
> identical to the route print on the 1.2 machine (again, which is
> working) - with the exception that their IP's are 3 and 4.
>
> Why is the 1.2 box working? Why will none of the others work? Anybody
> have an answer?
>
> A7
> --
> "Your country and mine is an interesting one, but there is nothing
> there that is half so interesting as the human mind" - Mark Twain
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: General Sisyphus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: QUESTION: why does in.identd keep running?!!!!
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 08:08:51 +0000
Sometimes I get dummy in.identd processes running in a crazy loop.
Here's the "top" listing of in.identd that's been running for 23 minutes
and is owned by "nobody"!!
765 nobody 18 0 624 624 504 R 0 95.4 0.4 23:44
in.identd
Sometimes I get a few of these running at the same time. It kills the
performance on my machine!!!
I think it happens when I run Netscape!
Any ideas?
Thanks for the help.
Si
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Anderson)
Subject: Re: Help.... Selectively disaling Masq
Date: 24 Aug 1999 06:52:00 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry people. It came good after a day or so the MASQ rules came
good.
CHris
Chris Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi,
: I have a 2.2.9 linux box. It works quite well. There is a local ethernet
: and two modems and another network ISDN (via ethernet). I cannot disable
: masquerading from the modem to the local network. The problem is now
: I have another network haniging off one of the modems. The modem does
: a proxy arp okay.... but I need to disable masquerading from the modem to
: the subnet. The following chains did not work
: target prot opt source destination ports
: MASQ all ------ 192.168.88.0/24 !192.168.88.0/24 n/a
: Chris
: Hi,
: I have a 2.2.9 linux box. It works quite well. There is a local ethernet
: and two modems and another network ISDN (via ethernet). I cannot disable
: masquerading from the modem to the local network. The problem is now
: I have another network haniging off one of the modems. The modem does
: a proxy arp okay.... but I need to disable masquerading from the modem to
: the subnet. The following chains did not work
: target prot opt source destination ports
: MASQ all ------ 192.168.88.0/24 !192.168.88.0/24 n/a
: Chris
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
