Linux-Networking Digest #369, Volume #12 Thu, 26 Aug 99 06:13:48 EDT
Contents:
HELP (Dave Robertson)
world access to NT intranet server through linux web server ("Hugh Krenske")
linux setup problem (Sindy Yip)
houston, we have a problem with our network... (Pete)
Re: Browsers and Linux (Richard Seaton)
Re: ftp access policies in squid ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ETRN ("Dirk Heinen")
Re: How do I setup Linux as a POP3 server? (Steve Heaven)
Re: How do you create a hard link? (Norman Levin)
Routing / Gateways (root)
Re: IPC$-password using Samba ("Christophe POIRIER")
Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex ("Torsten Pinkert")
Re: IPC$-password using Samba (VBF Ratingen)
eth0/ASDL and Kppp internet connection (apm)
FDDI Driver for 3Com or Interphase ("kilbeggan.xlink.net")
lock over NFS (Giulio Casella)
knfs + 2.2.11 + SunOS4 (Jochen Scharrlach)
Re: Linux VPN Masquerade and LAN access (Czaktisto)
How to lookup for a primary DNS ? ("Christophe")
diald problem (Michel Van den Bergh)
Re: IP masquerading prob/question (Markus Holzfeind)
Re: ipfwadm message log question (Chris)
Re: RH6, TP600 and PCMCIA IBM TR 16/4 Turbo (Christian Demmer)
Re: Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex (Cliff)
PPP problem: no route to host ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex ("Torsten Pinkert")
Re: Disapearing NIC? (Cliff)
Re: IPC$-password using Samba (Cliff)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Robertson)
Subject: HELP
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:46:29 GMT
Can someone clear the air on a subject.
Iv been told (maybe this is incorrect)
but is it possible to have more than one user connected to a dialup
BBS by a single phone line? Sound's crazy and maybe BS to me,
but someone mentioned what is called a PortMaster.
This device is suppose to allow a single phone line branch off
to several modems and allow more than one user to be connected
to the BBS system. Can anyone tel me if this is true?
How much are these things worth?
Are there cheap units around for 4 users?
------------------------------
From: "Hugh Krenske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: world access to NT intranet server through linux web server
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:18:12 +1000
Our company has both a linux box used as a internet server (apache) hosting
out web site and an NT based Intranet server (IIS).
The intranet server provides employees with company information drawn from a
database using a combination of asp, delphi and powerbuilder code and
presented in html format. This information is dynamically presented and
updated by employees using their browsers internally.
We have a need for employees to access this information remotely using the
web from customer sites or from their own offices.
Is their any way that the Linux web server can redirect external requests to
the NT intranet without having to register more IP address with out ISP.
I have acquired a piece of software which passes an address
(xxxxxxx.com:8082) to port 8082 which is used by the program to redirect
the outside request to another box on the other side of the firewall. This
is used on a Linux 2.0.10 server quite effectively and has been for several
years. However, it will not work on our version of Linux 2.0.34.
Is there a solution for us?
Hubert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Sindy Yip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux setup problem
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:52:02 +0800
Dear all,
I've encountered network probing problem when I use an ISA Intel
EtherExpress Pro 10 lan card during Red Hat Linux 6.0 installation. It
was running properly when in Win 95 platform. I've tried the given 2
Intel drivers namely EtherExpress Pro and EtherExpress Pro/100 but
failed.
Which driver should I use instead then?
Many thx in advance
Regards,
Sindy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: houston, we have a problem with our network...
Date: 26 Aug 1999 07:25:58 GMT
dear all,
i was given this by pac bell for my DSL line:
IP: 216.102.106.76
gateway: 216.102.106.254
subnetmask: 216.102.106.254
i'm assuming this info is ok to post. :) anyway, here is ifconfig eth0:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:00:48:F0:5A:DF
inet addr:216.102.106.76 Bcast:216.102.106.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:225 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:18 Base address:0xd800
telnet and ping work via ppp:
# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
iras-4.ucdavis. * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
216.102.106.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default iras-4.ucdavis. 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
now i try to make eth0 the default interface:
route add default gw 216.102.106.254
now nothing works. route simply hangs. ping hangs. telnet hangs. route
-n works (why?):
# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
169.237.17.225 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
216.102.106.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 216.102.106.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 169.237.17.225 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
i have to route del default gw 216.102.106.254 to get ping and telnet back.
i also tried deleting the ppp0 default gw before trying this with the same
result. stuff just hangs.
yet -- the rx/tx light on the dsl splitter flashes as if the system is
trying to send packets to pac bell.
can anyone shed light on this? i'm stumped (i'm fairly unknowledgable
about networking period, except for making ppp connections).
i'm dying to try out the 1.5 Mbs bandwidth. i want to upgrade my kernel,
but i want to do it over my brand new DSL connection.
can someone please help?
pete
--
=====================================================================
If I replied to your post for help with linux, email me your reply
because I normally only read USENET posts which have gone unanswered.
=====================================================================
http://landau.ucdavis.edu/psalzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One world, one web, one program. -- Microsoft Ad Campaign
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer. -- Nazi Ad Campaign
<=>+/\/-=Prevent world domination, Install Linux today!=-\/\+<=>
=====================================================================
The best way to accelerate a win95 system is at 9.81 m/s^2
------------------------------
From: Richard Seaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Browsers and Linux
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:08:43 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 8/25/99, 11:34:09 AM, "Kalkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote=20
regarding Browsers and Linux:
> I plan to install Linux by using either RedHat 6.0 or Mandrake
> Which browser can I use with Linux?
> I was visiting Netscape Home Page, and they have Netscape browsers for=
> Linux.
> There are listed following platforms:
> Linux 2.0, Linux 2.0 (glibc), Linux 1.2, ...
> What kind of Linux would I install with RedHat or mandrake?
> Can I use other browsers than Netscape? Which is most appropriate to=20
use?
> Could I also find some programs for e-mail, like Eudora, for Linux?
> Thank you for your help. I will greatly appreciate your answers.
> Regards,
> Kalkas
Redhat and mandrake use glibc2.1 use would get the glibc version of=20
netscape for linux
if you want to upgrade but both distros come with netscape anyway.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftp access policies in squid
Date: 26 Aug 1999 14:50:59 +0800
Sorry, some mistakes, should be like this,
acl FTP proto FTP
acl user1 src 10.1.2.3/255.255.255.255
http_access allow FTP user1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The FTP access can be specified in the squid.conf files, check this out,]
> acl FTP proto FTP
> acl user1 src 10.1.2.3/255.255.255.255
> http_access allow FTP wilson_li
> This works in my site.
------------------------------
From: "Dirk Heinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ETRN
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:40:40 +0200
Hi folks,
to deqeue the ISPs mailqeue over a dial-in line which can be opened only by
our side, not by our ISP, I want to send a scheduled ETRN to our ISPs
sendmail.
The script etrn.pl by John Beck, which is included in my linux distribution,
reads out the domain name of the server it resides on, which it shouldn't,
because the mailqeue is for a domain different to my servers. Unfortunately,
I am an absolute dummy to all that is programming languages, so I cannot
change the script.
Else I will need some different tool to do the job.
Any idea?
------------------------------
From: Steve Heaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How do I setup Linux as a POP3 server?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:37:41 +0100
"Salvador Asturias Jr." wrote:
>
> Does Linux have everything it needs to setup a POP3 server, or will I
> need to install a separate package for that? And, how do I do that? He
> have a couple of POP3 servers running on WinNT at work, and I'm thinking
> that it would be better to let Linux handle that.
Try qpopper. Uou can download a Linux binary from www.qualcomm.com
Steve
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:14:07 -0400
From: Norman Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How do you create a hard link?
Matt wrote:
>
> How do you create a hard link as opposed to a symlink? What is the
> difference?
Real links (hard links) are created withOUT the "-s" option.
A real link puts a new name/entry into a directory (link operation) and
gives it the SAME inode number as the original file. It ups a link
count in the inode. Since the two names point have the SAME inode number
to indicate the same file, they can ONLY be used within a file system.
Symbolic links were invented by Berkeley to give you the same facility
as a real link BUT you had to point to a file that could be in another
file system. ie /bin/command pointing to a command in /usr/bin - a separate
filesystem.
Which leads to the question:
ls -li /usr/bin/compress (note: you will see the Inode number)
in MANY unix systems, "uncompress" is a HARD link to compress. ie:
cd /usr/bin; ln compress uncompress
WHY OH WHY in linux, is everything symbolically linked? I can't
believe it is because that many people think ls with the '--color'
option is that wonderful. There HAS to be a reason people are
wasting an inode on that symbolic link - but I can't get any
reasonable answer on this.
--
Norman Levin
vm/dynAmIX inc.
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing / Gateways
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:36:20 +0200
SO, here is my problem: I have a linux-server with a modem, till here
it=B4s ok. Now I want the linux-server to act as a gateway, so every PC i=
n
the network the linux-server is in can access internet. I=B4ve already se=
t
up IP-forwarding, IP-chains, IP-Masw,... but it seems there is a
problem. Wehn I =B4tracert=B4 an access to the internet on the Win-Box, i=
t
doesn=B4t even access the linux-server....
Any ideas??
Thanks in advance!
Rainer.
------------------------------
From: "Christophe POIRIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPC$-password using Samba
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:56:41 GMT
Hi,
> I�m facing a problem with my Samba-server (again ;) ). When clicking it in
the
> network-neighbourhood (on a Win-Box), I�m asked for a password for ICP$.
What
> password is this, or how can I deactivate this question???
It's the administration of the computer from far away. There's an option on
the windows control panel (password?). It can be used with Microsoft's
administration programs.
CU, Christophe
------------------------------
From: "Torsten Pinkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:24:22 +0200
Hi,
I wonder if there is a possibility to force the VIA/Rhine driver to use 100
MBits / Half Duplex. In my current network of two computers directly
connected via crossover cable these cards only work at 100 MBits if I force
one of them to do so. At the moment that means to boot my Windows PC before
booting my Linux PC (Windows drivers have that force option).
Thanx in advance
Torsten
==========================================================================
Torsten Pinkert omp computer gmbh, Paderborn +49-5251-
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xlink-PoP Paderborn 15098-142
==========================================================================
------------------------------
From: VBF Ratingen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPC$-password using Samba
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:25:11 +0200
Christophe POIRIER wrote:
> =
> Hi,
> =
> > I=B4m facing a problem with my Samba-server (again ;) ). When clickin=
g it in
> the
> > network-neighbourhood (on a Win-Box), I=B4m asked for a password for =
ICP$.
> What
> > password is this, or how can I deactivate this question???
> =
> It's the administration of the computer from far away. There's an optio=
n on
> the windows control panel (password?). It can be used with Microsoft's
> administration programs.
> =
> CU, Christophe
I don=B4t quite understand what you mean. I know that there is something
like the remote-administration, but what should I chage, or which
pasword do I have to use (I do not have the emote-administration
enabled!)...?
Thanx!
Rainer.
------------------------------
From: apm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth0/ASDL and Kppp internet connection
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:04:46 GMT
I have set up my internet connection using an NEC2k PCI ethernet card
and an ASDL modem which works fine. I have also set up Kppp (KDE
frontend for pppd) to dial out to my ISP using an external modem. The
ppp connection works fine if I first reboot with the ASDL modem turned
off. If the eth0 connection is established with the ASDL modem on, all
internet traffic continues to be routed through eth0 and not through the
ppp connection even though the ppp connection is properly established.
Is there an elegant/easy way to turn the eth0 connection on and off or
otherwise have the ppp connection take precedence over the eth0
connection while the ppp connection is on?
------------------------------
From: "kilbeggan.xlink.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FDDI Driver for 3Com or Interphase
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:26:02 +0200
Hello,
did someone know a fddi driver for linux which will work with 3com or
interphase cards ?
thanx
uwe
------------------------------
From: Giulio Casella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lock over NFS
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:46:39 +0200
Hi.
I'm trying to use mail spool directory over an NFS mounted file system.
Only a month ago all my hosts were HP-UX 10.10, and everything worked.
Now the mail server is a linux (RedHat 6.0, kernel 2.2.5) box, but I've
experienced a problem. When someone try to lock some file over NFS
(for instance using elm) gets a "No locks available" message.
The file /var/log/messages of linux NFS server says:
Aug 22 21:02:20 toe kernel: fh_verify: //root permission failure, acc=4
, error=13
What I'm doing wrong? Is there a patch to correct this? Can Linux
correctly act as a NFS server?
Any ideas?
Please answer (also) via email.
Many thanks in advance.
--
Giulio Casella
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sysadm at Computer Science Dept.
University of Milano
------------------------------
From: Jochen Scharrlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: knfs + 2.2.11 + SunOS4
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:47:43 +0200
Hi,
yesterday I throw kernel 2.2.11 (including the patches that came with
knfsd 1.4.7) plus knfsd on our server and everything worked fine with a
Solaris 2.6, HP-UX 10.20 and Linux-client. Today someone logs into his
old SunOS 4.1.3-client and about 5 minutes afterwards the Linux server
completely hangs (no working console and no pings answered). We could
replicate this behaviour several times and the only message I could
find, was "kernel: svc: unknown version (3)" - though this message came
yesterday, too, and nothing happened. I switched back to 2.2.7 and the
old nfs-stuff and it seems to be ok again. Any clue?
Thanks,
Jochen
------------------------------
From: Czaktisto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Re: Linux VPN Masquerade and LAN access
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:04:43 GMT
Christopher Hatty wrote:
> (...)
>
> The problem I am encountering myself is that I have no idea how to set up my
> Linux Masquerade IPChains firewall thing (I'm new at this ;) to allow
> traffic to and from the VPN servers. So with my Linux box as my firewall,
> the VPN client on my internal Windows machine does not work. In fact, I
> can't even connect to the VPN server at all. Could you let me know how you
> managed, or where you found the information?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
I don't really know what kind of VPN you are using, but you should be able to
get information on the protocol that it uses from the vendor.
The thing is that the VPN's use normally a non-TCP/UDP protocol (ICMP is one
example of those, but there are many more), they use IP directly and with a
specific protocol number. If you can find out what protocols your VPN uses than
you can go to your IPchains admin and configure it so that the servers can
exchage IP packets with those protocol numbers.
The other solution would be to allow everything!!! (not recomended)
------------------------------
From: "Christophe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to lookup for a primary DNS ?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:42:08 +0200
I must find if a DNS of the company is set to primary or secondary. But this
DNS is in another country. I tried nslookup but can't list if it's primary
or secondary !
Could anyone help me ?
Thanks
Christophe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Michel Van den Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diald problem
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:52:49 +0200
Hi,
I have installed diald. It works... sort off. There is an annoying
problem. Often the address I enter first gets no reply. If I try a
second time everything works fine. Is this the expected behaviour? I
must say I find it rather annoying.
Regards,
Michel
------------------------------
From: Markus Holzfeind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading prob/question
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:56:35 +0200
luke wrote:
>
> My bad, it seems i can only use some ftp servers, for instance,
> ftp.netscape.com seems to work ok, but ftp.sunet.se says 500 Illegal
> Port Command!!
> I have no idea what that means, and would like to fix it. Any one got
> any ideas?
i had the same prob.
modprobe ip_masq_ftp solved it !
markus
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris)
Subject: Re: ipfwadm message log question
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:32:04 GMT
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 19:28:39 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott) wrote in
comp.os.linux.networking:
>also, does anyone have a good link to help interpret connection types?
http://www.con.wesleyan.edu/~triemer/network/docservs.html
------------------------------
From: Christian Demmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: RH6, TP600 and PCMCIA IBM TR 16/4 Turbo
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:00:16 +0200
Hi Paul,
I have the same configuration, but my pcmcia-cs tells me all the time, that
0xc0000.0xcbfff and 0xd0000-0xdffff is not free and so excluded.
The problem is now that I dont have enogh free ressources to map the card
memory.
Can you please mail your config.opts file???
Thanx,
Christian
Paul Thomson wrote:
> I have pretty much the same setup, TP600e, 2.2.10, PCMCIA 3.0.13. The
> only things I could suggest are running netcfg and telling the TR card
> which IRQ to use (I used 10), and the last line of my
> /etc/pcmcia/config.opts reads like this:
>
> module "ibmtr_cs" opts "mmiobase=0xd0000 srambase=0xd8000"
>
> Using a Turbo card, btw....
>
> Paul Thomson
> IBM Global Sevices
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:30:59 GMT, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I have recently reloaded RH6.0 on an IBM Thinkpad600, compiled 2.2.10
> >kernel, and added the PCMCIA 3.0.14 drivers, lib, utils, and teh tr225.gz
> >files to teh /pcmcia_3_0_14/clients directory.
> >
> >When I boot, the Delaying tr0 fails, but PCMCIA starts sucessfully with two
> >beeps. When I issue a ifconfig -a , I see both lo and tr0, but when I use
> >netconf to set the ip, netmask, gw, etc., the mahcine hangs during shutdown
> >while trying to stop tr0.
> >
> >Any idea's? When I ping now, I get "network unreachable"
> >
> >Thanks much!
> >Christopher
> >
> >------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 02:51:19 -0700
Hello,
/etc/conf.modules...
Try this:
alias eth0 via-rhine
options via-rhine full_duplex=0 debug=0
Cliff
Torsten Pinkert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if there is a possibility to force the VIA/Rhine driver to use 100
> MBits / Half Duplex. In my current network of two computers directly
> connected via crossover cable these cards only work at 100 MBits if I force
> one of them to do so. At the moment that means to boot my Windows PC before
> booting my Linux PC (Windows drivers have that force option).
>
> Thanx in advance
>
> Torsten
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Torsten Pinkert omp computer gmbh, Paderborn +49-5251-
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xlink-PoP Paderborn 15098-142
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP problem: no route to host
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:05:03 GMT
Hi!
I'm using RedHat 6.0 and I've got a problem with my PPP connection:
I get connected to my ISP, name resolution works but hosts can't be
reached.
I know name resolution works because ping shows the IP address of the
host specified but can't get an answer. The command traceroute isn't
able
to reach remote hosts and Netscape says "TCP Error: no route to host"
Anyway in one of many tries maybe one host is reached.
If I reboot the machine and use Win98 to connect everything works fine
so it seems to be a problem with my network configuration under linux.
Here is the log of the connection:
=================================================================
Aug 26 10:42:47 derquinse kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of
the University of California
Aug 26 10:42:47 derquinse kernel: PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
Aug 26 10:42:47 derquinse kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Aug 26 10:42:47 derquinse kernel: registered device ppp0
Aug 26 10:42:47 derquinse pppd[723]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: timeout set to 75 seconds
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: abort on (ERROR)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: abort on (BUSY)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: send (AT^M)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: expect (OK)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: AT^M^M
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: OK
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: -- got it
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: send (ATZ^M)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: expect (OK)
Aug 26 10:42:48 derquinse chat[724]: ^M
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: ATZ^M^M
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: OK
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: -- got it
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: send (ATL^M)
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: expect (OK)
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: ^M
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: ATL^M^M
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: OK
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: -- got it
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: send (ATDT954547000^M)
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: expect (CONNECT)
Aug 26 10:42:49 derquinse chat[724]: ^M
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse chat[724]: ATDT954547000^M^M
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse chat[724]: CONNECT
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse chat[724]: -- got it
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse chat[724]: send (^M)
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse pppd[723]: Serial connection established.
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse pppd[723]: Using interface ppp0
Aug 26 10:43:06 derquinse pppd[723]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Aug 26 10:43:09 derquinse pppd[723]: Remote message: CHAP Response
Value Matches calulated value!!!
Aug 26 10:43:09 derquinse kernel: PPP BSD Compression module registered
Aug 26 10:43:09 derquinse kernel: PPP Deflate Compression module
registered
Aug 26 10:43:09 derquinse pppd[723]: local IP address 195.5.77.218
Aug 26 10:43:09 derquinse pppd[723]: remote IP address 195.5.64.133
Aug 26 10:43:10 derquinse pppd[723]: Unsupported protocol (0x31)
received
Aug 26 10:43:40 derquinse last message repeated 2 times
Aug 26 10:45:18 derquinse pppd[723]: Terminating on signal 15.
Aug 26 10:45:18 derquinse pppd[723]: Connection terminated.
Aug 26 10:45:18 derquinse pppd[723]: Connect time 2.2 minutes.
Aug 26 10:45:18 derquinse pppd[723]: Sent 9618 bytes, received 11669
bytes.
Aug 26 10:45:18 derquinse pppd[723]: Exit.
=================================================================
This is what route returns:
=================================================================
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.0.1 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
195.5.64.133 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ppp0
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
lo
default 195.5.64.133 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
ppp0
default 192.168.0.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
=================================================================
This is my resolv.conf file:
=================================================================
domain rew
nameserver 195.5.64.2
nameserver 195.5.64.6
=================================================================
The nameservers are those of my ISP.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks.
Andres
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Torsten Pinkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Force D-Link 530-TX to use 100 MBit / Half Duplex
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:07:04 +0200
Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /etc/conf.modules...
>
> Try this:
>
> alias eth0 via-rhine
> options via-rhine full_duplex=0 debug=0
Thanks, will try. Is there ann option for disabling auto negotiation and
forcing 100 MBits too? I know that's not recommended, but my cards don't
automatically decide that they are 100 MBit-able. I think that's because of
the direct crossover connection. I don't want to by an extra switch just to
connect two computers...
------------------------------
From: Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disapearing NIC?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 02:59:06 -0700
Hello,
Can you locate eepro100.o?
Is it in /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/net/eepro100.o?
If so...
(1) You can create rc.modules file with the following 2 lines in it:
#!/bin/sh
insmod /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/net/eepro100.o
(2) Place this rc.modules to /etc/rc.d/ (as /etc/rc.d/rc.modules) and chmod
it to 755.
(3) Reboot your machine
Cliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've just installed Redhat 6.0, all went well, scsi was detected,as was
> my ethernet card, and Intel EtherExpress 10/100. One booting the first
> time, eth0 was not found, hence making the computer hang when trying to
> bring up eth0. Checking /etc/conf.modules there is an entry for the
> eepro100 driver, so why is it not found? It worked fine under Redhat
> 5.2.
>
> modprobe eth0 make the card appear, but its a bit late by the time I've
> booted into single user mode.
>
> Matthew
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Cliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPC$-password using Samba
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 03:01:47 -0700
Hello,
Create a guest account.
Go to http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/samba/toc.html for further details.
Cliff
Christophe POIRIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I�m facing a problem with my Samba-server (again ;) ). When clicking it in
> the
> > network-neighbourhood (on a Win-Box), I�m asked for a password for ICP$.
> What
> > password is this, or how can I deactivate this question???
>
> It's the administration of the computer from far away. There's an option on
> the windows control panel (password?). It can be used with Microsoft's
> administration programs.
>
> CU, Christophe
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
