I get your point. :)
We are talking at different frequencies. I'm talking about using Linux as a
standard to replace Windows and you are talking about Linux's identity being
a powerful OS.
[Jerome Tan]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.skyinet.net/users/jt888/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=pgpkey0
ICQ=1850588
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jerome Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: strategy for Linux
>I'm sorry, but I don't think the majority of Linux users agree with you.
>We want an open source operating system that can run on a range of
hardware.
>Windows users want one button installs, plug and play and something to run
>AOL. Linux will do just fine without embracing everyone, I like Linux the
way
>it is now, I don't need it to be as popular as windows to love and use it.
>
>On 25-Aug-98 Jerome Tan wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Like everyone else, I can see Microsoft's power extending over the ocean,
>> and many people thinks that Linux is the only contender of Microsoft, but
so
>> far... it's no much yet. It was known that Linux OS was proud of itself
>> because was better in terms of everything compare to Windows, I think
Linux
>> developers should think about "embrace and extend" strategy, that is, to
>> adapt everything or user interface of Windows so that it would be easy
for
>> everyone to move to Linux.
>>
>> Just my thoughts.
>>
>> [Jerome Tan]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Backup E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www.skyinet.net/users/jt888/
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=pgpkey0
>> ICQ=1850588
>>
>>
>
>
>--] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [--
>--] www.leto.net [--
>--] 25-Aug-98 05:13:50[--
>
>
>
