According to Barry Selk: While burning my CPU.
> 
> 
> Are you guys trying to give me a complex? I've been running on a DXII/66
> for over three years. I deleted OS/2 nd Win 3.x about a year ago and now
> devote 800+ MB to linux rather than 400 MB. I upgraded from 8 to 16 MB
> of RAM and from from kernel 1.2.11 to 2.0.34 via Redhat 5.1. Using 36
> Megs of swap. I have no probs running three X sessions at the same time. 
> A load of 2 Netscape Communicators, a WordPerfect, half dozen x-terms,
> RealAudio and xv while connected to the 'net via modem is not uncommon. 
> If I devote the 3rd X-session to x-boing, I can play that with no
> noticeable slowdown. DosEMU (Ihave a 50 mb DOS partition for my baseball
> game) in a console however, will slow down a single X session. This is a
> standalone machine.
>  
> Guess what I'm trying to say is ... yep, you can do it, but agree with
> the more HD space suggestion. 

Its not a question of "what you have but HOW you use it".

When doing "some" of the things you do with my machine which has a radio
network running on it and is very interrupt intensive i get packet under
and overruns but it does not miss a beat in the long run.

So what am i saying is, yes i agree with you whole hartidly.

> 
> Barry
>              -  Barry Selk               Calgary AB CA  -
>    \____     -    Linux 2.0.34    -     AmigaDos 3.1    -     ____/  
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to