According to Fabio: While burning my CPU.
>
>
>
> Mike Cropper - Parkside wrote:
>
> > ...for anyone but geeks.
> >
> > I'm evaluating Linux as an alternative to Windows NT in a large organization
> > (more than one million seats), but so far I am completely unconvinced that
> > this OS has any chance of upsetting the market equation.
>
> Hi first of all excuse me for my english....... I'm italian :-)
> Is true that in linux is hard to install new software, but on the other side in
> Windows the problem AFTER the installations of new software are many.
> I work for a big organization that have many computer with windows-office but
> the phonecall for problem with windows related software are too much versus the
> number of problem related with Linux.
> Linux is hard to start but windows is too hard to manage and make continuos
> work.
If an organisation like you work for has software maintainders and/or
computer executives, then i cannot possably see why they have ANY problems
with "any" operating system.
Linux is NOT hard to install its not hard to use and last but not least the
reason its is thought that linux is to hard to use is because the windows
enviroment is click and go, leaving its user dumbfounded as to what he would
have to do if he had to install software "by hand".
You cant drive a "Rolls Royce" if you cant drive a "mini".
As to your English, Bonno, multo betero thano my Italiano, Grazie.
"Ouch".
>
> Regards FABIO
>
--
Regards Richard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
