On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Re-enable deep flush so that users always have a way to be sure that a 
>>>> write
>>>> does make it all the way out to the NVDIMM. The PMEM driver writes always
>>>> make it "all the way to the NVDIMM", and it relies on the ADR mechanism to
>>>> flush the write buffers on power failure. Deep flush is there to explicitly
>>>> flush those write buffers to protect against (rare) ADR failure.
>>>> This change prevents a regression in deep flush behavior so that 
>>>> applications
>>>> can continue to depend on fsync() as a mechanism to trigger deep flush in 
>>>> the
>>>> filesystem-dax case.
>>>
>>> That's still very confusing text.  Specifically, the part where you say
>>> that pmem driver writes always make it to the DIMM.  I think the
>>> changelog could start with "Deep flush is there to explicitly flush
>>> write buffers...."  Anyway, the fix looks right to me.
>>
>> I ended up changing the commit message to this, let me know if it reads 
>> better:
>
> Thanks.  It's still unclear to me what the text, "The PMEM driver writes
> always arrive at the NVDIMM" means.  However, it's good enough.

Yeah, Dave, had similar feedback. A better way of saying it is that
the writes always arrive at the persistence domain, but deep flush
pushes them to the smallest platform failure domain. On current
platforms that's to the ADR domain and past the ADR domain.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to