* Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080925 13:24]:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:17:51PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080916 14:59]:
> > > CPU version was reported incorrectly (e.g. ES3.0 instead of ES2.1.)
> > > Also added a piece of optimization for CPU type check (omap_type()).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > index ab7a6e9..4e2b449 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > @@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_chip_is);
> > >
> > > int omap_type(void)
> > > {
> > > - u32 val = 0;
> > > + static u32 val;
> > > +
> > > + if (val != 0)
> > > + return val;
> >
> > Hmm I guess this would return a random val? :)
>
> it would return 0, look that val is static.
Ah, sorry I did not see the static. So this is to cache the result
to optimize it? I'd assume this function is only needed during some
init code hopefully where performance does not matter..
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
