* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080925 14:45]:
>  
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki) 
> >Sent: 25 September, 2008 14:41
> >To: ext Tony Lindgren
> >Cc: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki); Kristo Tero 
> >(Nokia-D/Tampere); [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed OMAP3 version check
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:31:21PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080925 13:24]:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:17:51PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > 
> >> > > * Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080916 14:59]:
> >> > > > CPU version was reported incorrectly (e.g. ES3.0 instead of 
> >> > > > ES2.1.) Also added a piece of optimization for CPU 
> >type check (omap_type()).
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c |    7 +++++--
> >> > > >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c 
> >b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c 
> >> > > > index ab7a6e9..4e2b449 100644
> >> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> >> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> >> > > > @@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_chip_is);
> >> > > >  
> >> > > >  int omap_type(void)
> >> > > >  {
> >> > > > -    u32 val = 0;
> >> > > > +    static u32 val;
> >> > > > +
> >> > > > +    if (val != 0)
> >> > > > +            return val;
> >> > > 
> >> > > Hmm I guess this would return a random val? :)
> >> > 
> >> > it would return 0, look that val is static.
> >> 
> >> Ah, sorry I did not see the static. So this is to cache the 
> >result to 
> >> optimize it? I'd assume this function is only needed during 
> >some init 
> >> code hopefully where performance does not matter..
> >
> >Yeah, it's not like we're gonna check the revision after the 
> >board is botted all up I guess.
> 
> PM code will need to either cache the type information or call this
> check every time when entering off-mode. Some things work differently in
> secure chips. Could probably just cache this inside PM code.

How about setting up the save and restore registers properly for GP
and HS omap once during PM init?

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to