On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:31:21PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080925 13:24]:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:17:51PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > * Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080916 14:59]:
> > > > CPU version was reported incorrectly (e.g. ES3.0 instead of ES2.1.)
> > > > Also added a piece of optimization for CPU type check (omap_type()).
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > > index ab7a6e9..4e2b449 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > > > @@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap_chip_is);
> > > >
> > > > int omap_type(void)
> > > > {
> > > > - u32 val = 0;
> > > > + static u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (val != 0)
> > > > + return val;
> > >
> > > Hmm I guess this would return a random val? :)
> >
> > it would return 0, look that val is static.
>
> Ah, sorry I did not see the static. So this is to cache the result
> to optimize it? I'd assume this function is only needed during some
> init code hopefully where performance does not matter..
Yeah, it's not like we're gonna check the revision after the board is
botted all up I guess.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html