> -----Original Message----- > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:29 PM > To: Varadarajan, Charulatha > Cc: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki); [email protected]; Nayak, > Rajendra; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio device > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:53:48AM +0200, ext Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:56 PM > >> To: Varadarajan, Charulatha > >> Cc: [email protected]; Nayak, Rajendra; [email protected]; > [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio > >> device > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:23:54PM +0200, ext Charulatha V wrote: > >> >+static inline struct gpio_bank *omap2_get_gpio_bank(int gpio, > >> >+ struct gpio_bank *gpio_bank) > >> >+{ > >> >+ if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) > >> >+ return &gpio_bank[gpio >> 5]; > >> >+ BUG(); > >> > >> so if we build support omap 2420 and 3430 we will have a BUG() ?? > > > >Multi-OMAP build will not give a BUG(). If this function is called > >during non-3430 OMAP arch, it will have a BUG(). > > still, you shouldn't sprinkle BUG() around the code this can cause some > hard to find kernel oopses. Just return NULL.
Okay. > > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
