* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> [110607 06:07]: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:40 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Archit Taneja <arc...@ti.com> [110504 10:30]: > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c > > > @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static struct regulator_consumer_supply > > > sdp3430_vdda_dac_supplies[] = { > > > /* VPLL2 for digital video outputs */ > > > static struct regulator_consumer_supply sdp3430_vpll2_supplies[] = { > > > REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss"), > > > - REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss_dsi1"), > > > + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss_dsi.0"), > > > }; > > > > > > static struct regulator_consumer_supply sdp3430_vmmc1_supplies[] = { > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > > > index 570e83f..eafadb4 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > > > @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static struct regulator_consumer_supply > > > sdp4430_vmmc_supply[] = { > > > }; > > > static struct regulator_consumer_supply sdp4430_vcxio_supply[] = { > > > REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss_dss"), > > > - REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss_dsi1"), > > > + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_dsi", "omapdss_dsi.0"), > > > }; > > ... > > > > Looks like we should first combine all this cut and paste data > > for each board file into some common init function to cut > > down the "crazy churn". > > I haven't been able to do this in a clean way. The regulator framework > is rather static in this area, and adding the data for REGULATOR_SUPPLYs > dynamically based on OMAP version is something I haven't been able to > do. > > The best option I've found out is defining helper macros to add those > consumers. An example patch below with 3430sdp and 4430sdp boards > modified. > > This would allow boards to setup the regulators whatever way they want, > but the 99% of the boards could just use the macros. > > It's still not as good as I'd want, because the source regulator is also > the same for a particular OMAP version for 99% of the boards. So there's > no real need to use those those macros in the board file, a common > display file should be able to set everything up. But as I said, I > haven't found out any way to do this. > > What is your opinion of this approach?
Well I guess the macros are a step in the right direction. Eventually we should have just one istance of the regulator_consumer_supply and just populate that instead of cloning it in each board file. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html