> I think that having a privileged `allow-ip' option to express this > would probably be better than a funny /etc/ppp/pap-secrets entry. YES! This is it! I think will be better! I resolved the problem with noauth in /etc/ppp/options (I know that is a security risk) and auth when a client use PAP (in mgetty). It works. > > Paul. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Catalin BOIE
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Clifford Kite
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Paul Mackerras
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Catalin BOIE
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Paul Mackerras
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Catalin BOIE
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Catalin BOIE
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Catalin BOIE
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! David L. Nicol
- Re: PAP problems (betwen 2.3.8 and 2.3.9)! Paul Mackerras
- Re: pppd - pap-secrets and plus sign Catalin BOIE
- Re: pppd - pap-secrets and plus sign Paul Mackerras
- Re: pppd - pap-secrets and plus s... Catalin BOIE
- Re: pppd - pap-secrets and plus s... Catalin BOIE
