Benjamin Schieder wrote: > Hi list. > > md2 : inactive hdh5[4](S) hdg5[1] hde5[3] hdf5[2] > 11983872 blocks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mdadm -R /dev/md/2 > mdadm: failed to run array /dev/md/2: Input/output error > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mdadm /dev/md/ > 0 1 2 3 4 5 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mdadm /dev/md/2 -r /dev/hdh5 > mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/hdh5: No such device > > md1 and md2 are supposed to be raid5 arrays. The arrays are inactive. In this condition, an array can be shut down, or bought up by adding another disk with proper superblock. So running it isn't possible because kernel thinks the array is inconsistent, and removing isn't possible because the array isn't running. It's inactive because when mdadm tried to assemble it, it didn't find enough devices with recent-enough event counter. In other words, the raid superblocks on the individual drives are inconsistent (some are "older" than others). If the problem is due to power failure, fixing the situation is usually just a matter of adding -f (force) option to mdadm assemble line, forcing mdadm to increment the "almost-recent" drive's event counter before bringing the array up. /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
