Yes, this is exactly the kind of symptoms I've experienced. I was
losing a drive here and there every couple of months (mostly the last
two drives sdc and sdd) which I though were cable problems (shut down,
re-plug the cables and restart and it would always work, with
add/rebuild the 4th disk). But now my guess is the motherboard chipset
is overheating (or maybe the drives). I have an MSI K9N platinum
AMD/Nividia chipset that has 4 raid ports + 2 raid ports from a separate
chip. The mb chipset comes with a wimpy heatsink on it and it is very
hot to the touch. I had been planning to replace it but never got
around to it.
I've been out of town this week so I had someone image all three disks.
He used ghost disk image application. He said the third disk reported
media problems, and about 5% of the data was not fixable (sector
errors). Using these three copied drives, the array comes up and
xfs_repair still reports a bunch of inode repairs as before, but it is a
bit different, maybe even a reduction in losses. But most important is
the hpa_sector errors no longer occur.
Key questions:
- I assume ddrescue will do a much better job of correcting errors when
imaging a disk? My colleague used ghost which is just a copy tool. I
don't understand the capabilities of ddrescue on raid partitions that well.
- fdisk -l reports that all the drives are exactly the same size with
exactly the same # sectors shown below. I don't quite follow the
hpa_resize issue, but it appears the drives don't have hidden HPA
sectors - I guess? Note that sdc is the original drive, where sda, sdb,
and sdd are the imaged drives.
So what do you recommend to do first? Should I try xfs_repair on the
ghost copy, or just re-copy myself using ddrescue? Are there special
settings to ddrescue I should consider to verify/correct potential HPA
changes?
Thks,
Chris
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
/dev/sda1 1 60801 488384001 fd Linux raid
autodetect
Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
/dev/sdb1 1 60801 488384001 fd Linux raid
autodetect
Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
/dev/sdc1 1 60801 488384001 fd Linux raid
autodetect
Disk /dev/sdd: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
/dev/sdd1 1 60801 488384001 fd Linux raid
autodetect
Bill Davidsen wrote:
David Greaves wrote:
Chris Eddington wrote:
Yes, there is some kind of media error message in dmesg, below. It is
not random, it happens at exactly the same moments in each
xfs_repair -n
run.
Nov 11 09:48:25 altair kernel: [37043.300691] res
51/40:00:01:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/e1 Emask 0x9 (media error)
Nov 11 09:48:25 altair kernel: [37043.304326] ata4.00:
ata_hpa_resize 1:
sectors = 976773168, hpa_sectors = 976773168
Nov 11 09:48:25 altair kernel: [37043.307672] ata4.00:
ata_hpa_resize 1:
sectors = 976773168, hpa_sectors = 976773168
I'm not sure what an ata_hpa_resize error is...
HPA = Hardware Protected Area.
By any chance is this disk partitioned such that the partition size
includes the HPA? If it does, this sounds at least familiar, this
mailing list post may get you started:
http://osdir.com/ml/linux.ataraid/2005-09/msg00002.html
In any case, run "fdisk -l" and look at the claimed total disk size
and the end point of the last partition. The HPA is not included in
the "disk size" so nothing should be trying to do so.
It probably explains the problems you've been having with the raid
not 'just
recovering' though.
I saw this:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/sata-issues-568894/
May be the same thing. Let us know what fdisk reports.
What does smartctl say about your drive?
IMO the spare drive is no longer useful for data recovery - you may
want to use
ddrescue to try and copy this drive to the spare drive.
David
PS Don't get the ddrescue parameters the wrong way round if you go
that route...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
