Hi Niklas,

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:11 AM Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderl...@ragnatech.se> wrote:
> On 2018-10-10 22:18:11 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Describe THS/CIVM in the R8A77980 device trees.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>

> > --- renesas.orig/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > +++ renesas/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi
> > @@ -330,6 +330,19 @@
> >                       #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >               };
> >
> > +             tsc: thermal@e6198000 {
> > +                     compatible = "renesas,r8a77980-thermal";
> > +                     reg = <0 0xe6198000 0 0x100>,
> > +                           <0 0xe61a0000 0 0x100>;
> > +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                  <GIC_SPI 68 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                                  <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                     clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 522>;
> > +                     power-domains = <&sysc R8A77980_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> > +                     resets = <&cpg 522>;
> > +                     #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>
> The status property is missing but as you told me in v1 it should not
> matter. I will leave it for Simon to decide if he wants it to keep it
> consistent with other SoC or if we should remove it from the other dtsi
> files. In any case with or without the status property.

Forgot to review commit c79661eb5060e2bf ("arm64: dts: renesas: Remove
unneeded status from thermal nodes")? ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to