Linux-Setup Digest #12, Volume #19 Wed, 28 Jun 00 00:13:09 EDT
Contents:
Re: NFS and mounting (Michael Nadler)
tutto in italiano ("--Gi0X�--")
RH5.2 won't mount RH6.1 file system ("mike")
Re: How to turn on remote root login? ("Gene Heskett")
Re: Setting up Personal LAN through TCP/IP on Internet (Koen Van de Velde)
Partitions (Simon Reye)
Re: modem help needed by newbie! ("Lonni J. Friedman")
Re: Help:apache did not run perl script (ljb)
Re: Getting NIC to work with MUlinux (Holly)
Cdrom mounting problem (CKTong)
Re: Is Samba installed with Redhat 6.2 (Ewan Edwards)
lilo.conf append help. ("james")
Re: Partitions (Ewan Edwards)
Queres entrar en Jubileo mas hermoso de toda la estoria... ("NG")
What the heck is the default Samba password? (Ignacio Valdes)
Re: Cant create a partition with disk druid?? (newbie ("Trent Cook")
Re: Partitions (Simon Reye)
Fdisk Error on 30gig IDE drive ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
idled and xdm (May Yam)
Re: insmod failed? ("Devon Harding")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael Nadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS and mounting
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:15:38 -0700
Was the Linux CD-ROM mounted in /mnt/cdrom? If not, that could explain the
NFS mount error. An fstype problem perhaps?
If it was mounted properly, you might post your /etc/exports, /etc/fstab
entries related to the CDROM.
And, if you ever change /etc/exports, you always have to follow that with:
killall -HUP rpc.mountd
killall -HUP rpc.nfsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a CD-ROM drive that is part of my Linux box. I want to install
> software on my SGI machine using the CD-ROM that is a part of the Linux
> box. So I thought I could edit the /etc/exports file and the hosts.allow
> file on the Linux box and then edit the fstab file on the SGI. Well, I
> did
> that and I got this error when I tried to mount:
>
> # mount -a
> mount: chum.seas.ucla.edu:/mnt/cdrom server not responding: Program not
> registered
> NFS version 3 mount failed, trying NFS version 2
>
> And it never worked. So I thought I needed to start the daemons. So on
> the
> Linux box I typed:
>
> # rpc.nfsd
> # rpc.mountd
>
> So now when I tried to mount I got this:
>
> # mount -a
> mount: chum.seas.ucla.edu:/mnt/cdrom on /cdrom: Unknown error
> mount: giving up on:
> /cdrom
>
> Anyone know what might be wrong? I really need this to work since I must
> install the software ASAP.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Taison
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "--Gi0X�--" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tutto in italiano
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:34:47 GMT
linux e oltre
--
-Gi0X�-
www.geocities.com/gioxburton
------------------------------
From: "mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH5.2 won't mount RH6.1 file system
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:04:33 -0400
Error is "Can't mount RDWR because of unsupported optional features."
mount: wront fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/foo,
or too many mounted file systems.
I mount RO and everthing seems fine.
I had this great idea to copy stuff from system running RH5.2 to a RH 6.1
formatted disk.
Is there a way to get by this?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: 27 Jun 2000 20:30:22 -0500
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to turn on remote root login?
Unrot13 this;
Reply to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gene Heskett sends Greetings to Michael Nadler;
>>
>> I've been told that an 'su -- -root' fixes that, but it doesn't on
>> either of my systems.
>>
MN> "su" works as you describe, but "su -" does not. The "-" option
MN> forces
MN> (essentially) a fresh login to take place and PATH *will* change.
And you'll note the slight change in useage above. I've not seen this
variation before, thanks. I'll give this one a try. I take it the
'root' is optional, and you'll need to enter that as well as the root
password in that event?
Cheers, Gene
--
Gene Heskett, CET, UHK |Amiga A2k Zeus040, Linux @ 400mhz
email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
ISP's please take note: My spam control policy is explicit!
#Any Class C address# involved in spamming me is added to my killfile
never to be seen again. Message will be summarily deleted without dl.
This messages reply content, but not any previously quoted material, is
� 2000 by Gene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Koen Van de Velde)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Setting up Personal LAN through TCP/IP on Internet
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:20:35 GMT
Hi Tom,
this sounds like a microsoft-problem to me.
The whole network neighbourhood-stuff relies on a
Master-browser-computer. In a workgroup environment, this is the
computer that was first powered on / in an NT-environment, this
probably is the Primary Domain Controller. Other computers tell the
master-browser that they are online, and contact the master-browser to
see of there 'fellows' are online. This mechanisme has timeouts of
about 15 minutes (or more if the master-browser goes down).
If I remember well, the looking-for-masterbrowsers mechanisme uses
broadcasts, which are not routed by your linux-router. And that's your
problem.
You can use : Start | Run | '\\192.168.1.1\sharename'
if you know the remote-pc's ip (notice this works fine on NT but not
always on win9x)
Even better : create a lmhosts-file with the computername - ipnumber
relationship and use : start| run| \\computername\share' (this works
fine on win9x to)
If you really need to use dynamic ip's ; I'm afraid that M$ forces you
to install a WINS-server (this one takes over the master-browser job).
All clients (locale & remote) should point to this server as there
wins-server and notify it when the power-on/down. The others can then
contact the wins-server to see if their colleges are 'alive'.
Hope this helps you out (a bit) ;-)
BTW : I'm on the other end of the problem. My M$-environment is
working (fine), but I would like to setup the VPN-connection using a
linux-router. Can you point me to the right documentation that helped
you to configure it ? Thanx in advance !
Koen.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:43:20 GMT, tom_blank@*nospam*hotmail.com (Tom
M) wrote:
>I am trying to set up a personal LAN for home. There is however a
>catch.
>
>On this LAN I have my 3 computers. All set up correctly and working on
>the LAN ( they can be detected through network neighbourhood ) ( all
>are win9x workstations ).
>
>I would also like to allow friends of mine to connect to this LAN from
>their home boxes so we can all be on the same network at once ( all
>visible through Network Neighbourhood ).
>
>I have set up PPTPD on my Linux box to allow them to log in and use
>the 192.168.X.X addresses as I have on my Internal network. They can
>connect fine using the Microsoft VPN Adapater, and route through me
>fine but are not visible through network neighbourhood. ( they can be
>pinged on their 192.168.x.x ip )
>
>Am I using the correct daemon to attach these computers?
>With PPTPD is there a method to enable broadcasting across the subnet?
>
>
>Any suggestions would be appreciated.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Reye)
Subject: Partitions
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:48:35 GMT
I've setup Red Hat Linux before and had a look around but it was only
on a small partition. I've now been able to get rid of Windows 98 and
have a full 6Gb hard drive to muck around with and plan to install
Linux here. My question is do I really need to create 6 or 7
different partitions as suggested or can I get away with just the main
partition and a swap partition? What is the purpose of different
partitions? Also I want to try and setup Linux as a server of sorts -
although it won't be doing any great things and will just be on my
home network. I just want some experience in setting it up and
maintaining it. So it'll be a web server, file server, mail server
and probably some other stuff like DNS. Do I really need the whole
6Gb considering it just for testing or can I get away with say 4 of
5Gbs worth of space (I'd like to test BeOS out as well which is why I
want a little bit of space left over)
TIA
Simon
------------------------------
From: "Lonni J. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem help needed by newbie!
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:02:28 -0400
What does "i can't get anything out of it" mean?? How do you know its
not a winmodem?
Tim Bartek wrote:
>
> My modem used to work on LM 6 but now on LM 7 nothing I do seems to work.
> I've tried the setserial command, and also setting the irq to autoconfig but
> can't get anything out of it. On windows my modem is com3 irq 5. It is not
> a "winmodem". Does anyone have any ideas please?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ljb)
Subject: Re: Help:apache did not run perl script
Date: 28 Jun 2000 01:05:31 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am learning to write simple cgi scripts. I could not get it to run on my
>Liunx apache. I can view web pages in /home/httpd/html directory, but I put
>some perl scripts in /home/httpd/cgi-bin, every time I tried to go
>http://myserver/cgi-bin/script, I got an access error message, in the error
>log it like this: "GET /cgi-bin/howdy.pl HTTP/1.1" 500 534".
>What is wrong and what should I do?
>My system: RedHat 6.1, Apache 1.3
Look in the error log, not the access log, for more information.
A 500 error is a server problem; with CGI scripts it often means
something went wrong before the script could write headers back.
------------------------------
From: Holly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Getting NIC to work with MUlinux
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:22:15 GMT
read Beckys post re:- "AMD ethernet setup" it's six/seven post's earlier
than yours.
Holly
John P White wrote:
>
> I am trying to get my NIC to work with MUlinux. My nic is a AMD 79C970.
> I am trying to get it to work with MUlinux (a small distro of linux that
> runs off a floppy disk). Here is what MUlinux says i have to do to get a
> module(i am assuming that is what the NIC driver is, a module) to work:
>
> 14.2 Modules
>
> The root partition resides on the floppy, split into two parts (see
> section What happens at boot time?): The first part (ROOT) just contains
> the directory
> structure (/bin, /lib, etc.)
>
> The first thing to do if you want to build a custom muLinux is to unpack
> the BOOT,ROOT,USR and X11 images with the command mu -u. It will unpack
> the
> BOOT partition under subdirectory tree/startup and ROOT+USR+X11 under
> subdirectory tree/.
>
> Now, add, wipe, replace commands as you like. <---HOW DO I DO THIS?
>
> If you want to change the kernel, compile it with make zImage and copy
> it under tree/startup/boot/mulinuz. The necessary modules must be
> gzipped
> and copied in tree/startup/modules/archive.tbz (see
> tree/startup/modules/README, for details).
>
> It is often necessary to specify parameters like io, irq and so on when
> you load a module. If your X.o module needs extra parameters just write
> them into
> tree/startup/modules/X.param, remembering that muLinux loads modules
> with a command equivalent to this
>
> insmod X.o `cat X.param`
>
> Please note that you have to compile ext2, DOS, UMSDOS file-system
> support and ramdisk support directly into the kernel because they are
> needed at boot
> time for UMSDOS muLinux models.
>
> If you look into the mu script you will find a variable called
> BOOT_FREE: with it you can tune the free space you want on the BOOT
> partition, where all
> configurations are saved permanently and where you may want to save you
> emails for instance.
>
> and here is what the ethernet howto had to say about my NIC:
>
> AMD 79C970/970A (PCnet-PCI)
>
> Status: Supported, Driver Name: pcnet32
>
> This is the PCnet-PCI -- similar to the PCnet-32, but designed for PCI
> bus based systems. Please see the above PCnet-32 information. This means
> that you
> need to build a kernel with PCI BIOS support enabled. The '970A adds
> full duplex support along with some other features to the original '970
> design.
>
> Note that the Boca implementation of the 79C970 fails on fast Pentium
> machines. This is a hardware problem, as it affects DOS users as well.
> See the Boca
> section for more details.
>
> I am fairly good at linux, but I have never installed a module before. I
> have gotten mtr to work (with slackware, not this one) but beyond that i
> havent really doen too much. Im pretty sure I could recompile a kernal
> if I had to, so how can I get this nic to work with MUlinux? Thanks in
> advance, John.
------------------------------
From: CKTong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cdrom mounting problem
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:37:59 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am running my P100 linux box using Mandrake 6.5.
When I try to use the the Cdrom, a KFM error message appear:
mount : /dev/cdrom
is not a valid block device
What seem to be the problem ?
Any help ?
CK
------------------------------
From: Ewan Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Is Samba installed with Redhat 6.2
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:18:44 +1000
danc wrote:
>
> Ronald Cole wrote:
>
> > Patricia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >When installing Gnome or KDE desktop in Redhat 6.2 does it also install
> > > >Samba?
> > > >How do i check to see if Samba is installed?
> > >
> > > in a terminal type whereis samba
> > > this should give something like
> > > [pat@localhost pat]$ whereis samba
> > > samba: /usr/sbin/samba /usr/man/man7/samba.7
> >
> > Better is "rpm -qa | grep samba". Best is to just get the
> > samba-2.0.7-4 rpms off of updates.redhat.com and install those for
> > the security fixes.
> >
> > --
> > Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
> > Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (760) 499-9142
> > President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
> > My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B
>
> OK, it's installed, but how to get it to work? I've tried everything. I'm at
> work on an NT4 ethernet. I have a second desktop machine running Readhat 6.2
> as a proof of concept to start replacing
> windows with Linux. I need to get SAMBA working. I tried commands like
> these, as well as all the permutations, (10.2.1.135 is my NT4 machine on our
> DHCP ethernet, shared is the name of the share I
> created on it to share to Linux, /root/dchaplin is the directory I created
> in Linux to map the NT share to):
>
> smbmount -I //10.2.1.135/shared/ /root/dchaplin
>
> smbclient //10.2.1.135/shared/ -U danc -I 10.2.1.135 -N
>
> can anyone steer me to a simple fool-proof guide to set up SAMBA so I can
> access my NT4 workstation through the ethernet with my REDHAT BOX ON THE SAME
> ETHERNET?
The best place to start for guides & doco is the SMB HOWTO by David Wood
et.al. from Plugged In Software ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). The document
can be found at your favourite HOWTO repository. The next place to go
is your /usr/doc/samba-2.0.6 directory.
As far as making it work & finding out what the problem(s) is concerned,
go to samba.org and look for a file called DIAGNOSIS.txt (it might even
be somewhere in your /usr/doc/samba-2.0.6 directory). That file takes
you through the various steps, in logical order, to find the _real_
cause of your problems, not just the imagined ones.
Good Luck!
------------------------------
From: "james" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lilo.conf append help.
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 02:29:32 GMT
i've been trying to install an ISA ne2000 clone in my rh6.2 machine today,
and have had some troubles. i read somewhere that i have to put 'append=
[something]' into lilo.conf so that linux will see my ISA card as eth0.
under win98, the card was IRQ10, I/O 300h. any ideas what i
have to add exactly?
thanks,
james.
------------------------------
From: Ewan Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Partitions
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:31:12 +1000
Simon Reye wrote:
>
> I've setup Red Hat Linux before and had a look around but it was only
> on a small partition. I've now been able to get rid of Windows 98 and
> have a full 6Gb hard drive to muck around with and plan to install
> Linux here. My question is do I really need to create 6 or 7
> different partitions as suggested or can I get away with just the main
> partition and a swap partition? What is the purpose of different
> partitions? Also I want to try and setup Linux as a server of sorts -
> although it won't be doing any great things and will just be on my
> home network. I just want some experience in setting it up and
> maintaining it. So it'll be a web server, file server, mail server
> and probably some other stuff like DNS. Do I really need the whole
> 6Gb considering it just for testing or can I get away with say 4 of
> 5Gbs worth of space (I'd like to test BeOS out as well which is why I
> want a little bit of space left over)
>
> TIA
>
> Simon
No, you don't NEED to set up that many partitions. All you really NEED
is
is a single primary partition with a swap _file_, but that is not
recommended.
My _personal_ minimum recommendation is a root partition (/) of
1500-2000Mb,
a swap partition of about 120Mb, and a home (/home) partition of 1000Mb.
The purpose of keeping the home partition separate is so that you can
rebuild
the whole system at any time without risking any of those cool downloads
etc.
that you have.
------------------------------
From: "NG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Queres entrar en Jubileo mas hermoso de toda la estoria...
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 02:35:02 GMT
Roma para Ti:
http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Arena/3230
------------------------------
From: Ignacio Valdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What the heck is the default Samba password?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:05:55 -0500
Hello all,
I'm trying to get Samba 2.xxx working on my little home network. When I
enter smbclient -L hostname to see that it lists my share like my not so
great Samba admin guide says and it prompts me for a password!??? My
mediocre Samba admin guide sheds zero light on this. What should I give
it? I've sent it my regular passwords, nothing as well as a null
password, zip. I have not created a samba password file. Can anyone
help me with this?
-- IV
------------------------------
From: "Trent Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cant create a partition with disk druid?? (newbie
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:24:27 GMT
Eric, many thanks on your post. You have a very good thought here, the only
problem is that my 13 gig is primary master, 5 gig is primary slave and my
cd and cdr are my secondary drives.
I have a SCSI drive as well, but am not using for linux....
So with your chart the 5 gig western digital would be /HDB right...well man,
thank you soo much for trying...guess Ill just have to keep searching, or if
you have any other thoughts, please let me know.
Thanks
Trent
"Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Trent,
>
> I'm making a guess here, and I'm not sure if it's the cause of you're
> problems, but is the 5G drive connected as /dev/hdc?. IIRC (some/all?)
> bios'es cannot boot from anything but hda and hdb, so it might be so
> that diskdruid
> -in order to prevent you from making an unbootable system- doesn't allow
> you to create a /boot on /dev/hdc. Connect the HDD as /dev/hdb and see
> if that resolves the problem.
>
> In case you don't know this yet:
>
> primary IDE controller : master = /dev/hda
> slave = /dev/hdb
> secondary IDE controller: master = /dev/hdc
> slave = /dev/hdd
>
> Eric
>
> Trent Cook wrote:
> >
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I figured the best way to get out of my linux mess, was a complete fresh
> > install. Guess not, cause here is my problem:
> >
> > I have 2 hard drives: one 13gig cut up for windows and one 5gig cut up
for
> > linux.
> >
> > The problem is that I can only create a swap partion on my 5 gig drive.
I
> > have deleted all partitions in fdisk, disk druid, linux fdisk, delpart
etc
> > etc and every time I come to disk druid in the setup. It says that I
have
> > 100% free space on my 5 gig drive, but when I try to create a /boot or
a /
> > root drive it says there isnt enough space.
> >
> > Oddly enough I can create swap files (as many , or as big as I want with
the
> > 5 gig drive?)
> >
> > Why cant I make any other drives? I tried creating them with fdisk and
> > converting to linux but no go.
> >
> > I did an Fdisk /mbr as well (just cause i ran out of things to try) but
> > nothing.
> >
> > So I guess Linux doesnt want to go on my machine, but I am sure that
there
> > must be something I can do.....isnt there?
> >
> > Please Help!
> >
> > Trent (newbie)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Reye)
Subject: Re: Partitions
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:33:40 GMT
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:31:12 +1000, Ewan Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>Simon Reye wrote:
>>
>> I've setup Red Hat Linux before and had a look around but it was only
>> on a small partition. I've now been able to get rid of Windows 98 and
>> have a full 6Gb hard drive to muck around with and plan to install
>> Linux here. My question is do I really need to create 6 or 7
>> different partitions as suggested or can I get away with just the main
>> partition and a swap partition? What is the purpose of different
>> partitions? Also I want to try and setup Linux as a server of sorts -
>> although it won't be doing any great things and will just be on my
>> home network. I just want some experience in setting it up and
>> maintaining it. So it'll be a web server, file server, mail server
>> and probably some other stuff like DNS. Do I really need the whole
>> 6Gb considering it just for testing or can I get away with say 4 of
>> 5Gbs worth of space (I'd like to test BeOS out as well which is why I
>> want a little bit of space left over)
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Simon
>
>
>
>No, you don't NEED to set up that many partitions. All you really NEED
>is
>is a single primary partition with a swap _file_, but that is not
>recommended.
>
>My _personal_ minimum recommendation is a root partition (/) of
>1500-2000Mb,
>a swap partition of about 120Mb, and a home (/home) partition of 1000Mb.
>The purpose of keeping the home partition separate is so that you can
>rebuild
>the whole system at any time without risking any of those cool downloads
>etc.
>that you have.
Oh and that's another thing I forgot to mention. I now have 128Mb of
RAM so does that mean my swap partition should be around 256Mb?
Simon
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fdisk Error on 30gig IDE drive
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:43:35 GMT
I replaced a 20gig drive with a 30gig drive. (used LBA on both)
I'm setting up RedHat 6.1, and using about a quarter of the drive for
a Win98 system for the FEW things that I still don't have on Linux.
I partitioned the drive using Partion Magic 4.0
I do a text mode install (ATI Rage video card....)
3 steps in I get:
"Fdisk Error
An error occurred reading the partition table for the
block device hda. The error was: No free resources."
HUH????
The 20gig drive worked fine. What's going on?
Heeeelp! Please!
------------------------------
From: May Yam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: idled and xdm
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:37:13 +0800
Hi all
Is there any package like 'idled' that kills idling X session from
remote X terminal.
I have tried setting up idled 1.16 on Redhat6.2 box and SuSE6.4
box (both with xdm on to manage some thin linux X terminals), idled did
not work. It seems that idled relies on wtmp and the 'last' or 'finger'
commands on both boxes reported wrong login information (it either
missed the remote X session logon or it showed the wrong idle time for
the logon user). So does it have anything to do with the 'wrong' wtmp?
Does xdm and the remote sessions mess up wtmp?
What should I do? Please help! :(
Thankyou.
Regards
May
------------------------------
From: "Devon Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: insmod failed?
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:55:10 -0400
It's actually enabled at boot up, but fails at 'insmod 3c509'. After the
system has comeup, I can then manually do 'insmod 3c509' then 'ifconfig eth1
192.168.0.1' insmod seems to timeout on boot.
-Devon
"Craig Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Devon Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Here is a copy of my "conf.modules"
> > alias eth0 ne
> > options ne io=0x300 irq=10
> > alias eth1 3c509
> > options 3c509 io=0x320 irq=5
> > alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> > pre-install pcmcia_core /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcmcia start
> >
> > I'm using RHL62
>
> Then you should just be able to click the "start interface at boot
> time" in the network control panel; or edit it manually in
> /etc/sysconfig.
>
> --
> The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.
> Craig Kelley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP block
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
