Linux-Setup Digest #812, Volume #19 Thu, 12 Oct 00 05:13:10 EDT
Contents:
Re: RedHat can not see hde disk ("Tom Ratrie")
Re: Newbie installation problem on Red Hat 6.2 with Geforce 256 (moonie;))
Re: A new directory hierarchy standard - need opinions (Equinox)
Re: GRUB ??? ("Blake Leverett")
Re: dual boot large disk problem (E J)
Re: Aureal Sound Cards (J Wendel)
Re: configure script fails on gcc test ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: running java on redhat 6.2 (John Pogue)
Re: Newbie Help - Burning ISO Disks for RH 7.0 (Eric)
Re: X Fonts -- HELP (Eric)
Re: Suggestions in Setting up RH7? (Francis)
Re: Linux Partition Link Corrupted (Eric)
scsi ide linux and nt (Eli Napchan)
Re: will autopoweroff in Linux allow remote access ("Quiney, Philip
[HAL02:HH00:EXCH]")
sendmail (george)
Help! Installing RH7.0 with windows 2000 ("Chang-Cheng (Eric) Chao")
HELP Linux install has hosed Win98 (ragthorn)
permissions, so confused ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Cant� connect to ISP ("bluster")
Re: Help! Installing RH7.0 with windows 2000 (Eric)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Tom Ratrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat can not see hde disk
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:31:42 -0400
Rafael,
I had the same problem on my system...it would not see hde or beyond. But I
also noticed, like you, that Mandrake 7.1 installed without a problem. So,
I installed Mandrake and found out what the I/O address was for the offboard
controller card controlling hde and hdf. In my case it was:
IDE2=0xd400,0xd800 IDE3=0xdc00,0xe000
Then during the install of RH7 I added these parms during the install and it
found hde and hdf without problem. Then I just added these parms to the
lilo.conf file in the /etc directory and ran /sbin/lilo to apply them and
all is well.
Good Luck,
Tom
===== Original Message =====
From: "Rafael - LumesITSupport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: RedHat can not see hde disk
> I can not install RedHat on my hde disk, it can not see it. What to do.
> But Windows install without problem and Gentus Linux too. How to force
> RedHat to see hde not only hda, hdb, hdc and hdd but also disk from
> third and 4 controler.
>
> Please help me
>
> Rafael
>
"Rafael - LumesITSupport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I can not install RedHat on my hde disk, it can not see it. What to do.
> But Windows install without problem and Gentus Linux too. How to force
> RedHat to see hde not only hda, hdb, hdc and hdd but also disk from
> third and 4 controler.
>
> Please help me
>
> Rafael
>
------------------------------
From: moonie;) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie installation problem on Red Hat 6.2 with Geforce 256
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:35:17 -0400
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, JIE YUAN wrote:
>i tried to install red hat 6.2. my computer is
>piii 700e
>motherboard intel cc820
>vedio adapter: geforce 256 (64M)
>monitor: sony cpd-100e
>
>after installation, everything works well except xwindow and xterm. When I
>tried to run either of them. my monitor stated "signal out of range". Is
>that to say my geforce is not compatible with rh6.2?
>
>suggestion to this problem is welcome.
>
>george
No it means that you have set the refresh rate too high for the monitor.
--
moonie ;)
Registered Linux User #175104
http://counter.li.org
KDE2
Kernel 2.4.0-test5
XFree86 4.0 Nvidia .94 drivers
RAID 0 Striped
Test-Pilots-R-Us ;)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Equinox)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: A new directory hierarchy standard - need opinions
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:43:10 GMT
On 11 Oct 2000 00:31:03 GMT, Todd Knarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Shouldn't the directory containing include
>> files be under a src/ directory somewhere?
>
> Nope. Think a second. src/ contains source code. Where do the include
> files for, say, glibc go if you don't have the source code for glibc
> installed ( this would be most machines )? This doesn't show up when
> thinking about applications but does show up in the set of files needed
> to use a library vs. the set of files needed to build the library in the
> first place.
The include files for glibc would go in the location where the glibc
source would reside if it were present. If the glibc source were to
reside in src/glibc-whatever/ , then the glibc includes would be
located in src/glibc-whatever/include/ or /src/glibc-whatever/headers/
or something similar.
The includes would need to be accessible from a common location, of
course, for the benefit of the compiler. This is why God gave us
symlinks. Of course, the result would be similar to /usr/include/ ,
but it doesn't need to be directly beneath /usr/ . Perhaps this could
reside in the lib/ directories, as lib/include/ .
The main point here is that the hierarchies immediately beneath / ,
/usr/ , and /usr/local/ should be as similar as possible. Exceptions
will occur, of course; but avoidable departures should be, well,
avoided.
>> Why, then, do we have /opt/bin/ , /opt/lib/ , and
>> so forth?
>
> Convention. /opt is broken down per-package. If you aren't referencing
> the /opt/{package} directories directly, you usually make a link from
> /usr/{bin|lib|...} ( or /usr/local/{bin|lib|...} to the appropriate files
> under /opt.
Exactly my point. The "front-end" binaries of a package in opt/ would
be symlinked into the existing bin/ directory appropriate to its role
in the system. A separate opt/bin/ would be unnecessary.
> Frankly I find /opt a kludge, but it's a reasonable solution when
> dealing with packages that like to own their entire directory tree
> and don't co-exist well in the same directories as other packages.
I think opt/ is a rather good solution for large packages. As one
person (who sent a response via private e-mail) pointed out, it is
"much easier to blow the cruft away after it proves its true value."
It's only kludgey in that "proper" use of opt/ tends to cause either a
lot of symlinks, or an extremely long $PATH . It follows that opt/
should only be used for packages whose complexity truly warrants such
segregation. X11 is a prime example (see below).
>> I interpret "add-on" to mean "not essential to system
>> operation". In light of this, why do we have /opt/ , instead of
>> /usr/opt/ and /usr/local/opt/ ?
>
>Because either would be exactly equivalent to /opt?
Not so, by reason of location. As the previously mentioned fellow
said in his message,
/usr was for 'unvital' stuff like compilers, headers and
nice-to-have executables. / is for must-have-to-run.
I would amend this to say that the hierarchy under /usr/ (excepting
/usr/local/ ) is for non-vital stuff that came with the distribution,
and that the /usr/local/ hierarchy is for non-vital stuff that didn't
come with the distribution.
Therefore,
1) /opt/ would be for large, complex packages that were required by
the system (not too many of these, if any at all -- hence my earlier
language suggesting that perhaps /opt/ shouldn't exist). This also
raises the question, would "opt" be a fitting name for this directory?
2) /usr/opt/ would be for large, complex, non-vital packages that were
provided by the maintainers of the distribution.
3) /usr/local/opt/ would house large, complex packages added by the
local sysadmin.
>> 4) All special allowances for X11 need to be done away with. It's
>> just another program, but its current convoluted directory
>> structure makes configuration and administration needlessly
>> difficult. Gathering up this monster's sprawling pieces and
>> sticking them into /usr/opt/X11R6/ might not be a bad idea.
>
>Already done, isn't it? At least on my system everything for X11 lives
>under /usr/X11R6 except for the config files under /etc/X11.
True. Most of X's problems lie in the scrambled internal structure of
the package. But it still needs to be located in something like an
opt/ directory. It just seems like having the X11R6 directory
directly under /usr/ is messy.
--Russell
============================================================
email (spam-disabled):
rdh *at* salug *dot* org
------------------------------
From: "Blake Leverett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: GRUB ???
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:57:33 GMT
This is annoying behavior. I fixed this by making the lilo executable
non-executable, so these GUI config programs can't run LILO and undo grub.
This may be the brute-force way, but it keeps grub installed.
Blake Leverett
Martin Racette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
I have installed Mandrake 7.1 and it use GRUB by default, but now I have
to re-install Windows98, but everytime I do this I need to reconstruct
the MBR, but when I use DRAKCONF, it install LILO instead of GRUB, and I
would like to know how do I install GRUB, without having to use the
Mandrake's CDs, and do an UPDATE, to re-install GRUB
So if anyone could help me I would appreciate
Thank you in advance
Merci a l'avance
Martin
------------------------------
From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dual boot large disk problem
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:12:24 -0700
You can put the 16M linux /boot partition after 500MB because it should be
below the 1024 cylinder (in my case 8G)
put the swap and other linux partition afterwards.
I hope you have luck with the 42G.
I had problems formatting the last 20G for linux with Redhat 6.2, Redhat
7.0 works much better.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to install RedHat 6.2 on a machine that already has Windows
> 98 running on it. The machine has one 42 GB disk. I ran fips to
> shrink the 42 GB partition down to 18 GB and plan to place linux in the
> remaining space.
>
> Unfortunately I encountered a problem at the install stage that
> specifies the partitions. I tried to create a linux native parition
> for "/" of size 2000 MB, but the installer complained that the
> partition was too big. I believe it is complaining because it thinks
> the windows partition is too big (and hence the boot partition can't be
> placed at the front of the disk).
>
> I don't want to wipe my disk and place a boot partition within the
> first ~500 MB of the disk. Surely there must be a way around this
> problem.
>
> Any help or advice?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J Wendel)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Aureal Sound Cards
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 05:23:47 GMT
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:42:45 -0700, me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The folks over at SourceForge have improved the Aureal driver, and
>their modified version is supposed to work much better. You can get
>the modified driver, and information abvout it, here:
>
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/aureal/
>
>I am currently having trouble getting it installed under RedHat 7, but
>that may be a problem just with that distribution. The SourceForge
>driver apparently works great with RedHat 6.2, and many other
>distributions.
>
>PS - Anyone know how to make the driver work under RedHat 7?
>
I've tried the SourceForge version of the driver under 2.2.17 and
2.4.0-test9. In both cases, it worked fine when running without X, but
the computer locked up totally while I was resizing a window under X.
I'm running X 4.01 with a Voodoo Banshee, on an AMD K6-III.
Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
John
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: configure script fails on gcc test
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 05:16:19 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sven Mascheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, "none" shouldn't be here.
> Seems configure reused the result (output) from an earlier test,
"none".
> (I guess it's not a hardcoded bug in that configure script.)
> If this doesn't happen with another configure from another major
> package (say bash), this one is a bit buggy.
I'm getting the same error on configure from plib-1.2.0
I ran the same script on another RH 6.1 box without incident, so
something is broken on my box. question is what. Any advice on what to
re-install?
thanks
Matt K
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:35:47 -0500
From: John Pogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: running java on redhat 6.2
Jingjing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just downloaded JDK 2 from SUN's site and unzip and untared it.
> I was able to compile the java source file fine but when I want to run
> the .class file I get the following error:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Hello
>
> Any ideas why?
>
> Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!
I've toyed with Java2 for a while now and get this message once in
a while, try the following:
1. create a html file with the following tags
<html>
<applet code="myjavafile.class" width=300 height=400></applet>
</html>
2. name this file the same as your java file, but with an .html extension
3. then run the following appletviewer javafile.html
should work from there, unless something is coded wrong in your class.
Hope this helps
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie Help - Burning ISO Disks for RH 7.0
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:16:01 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mickey Stein wrote:
>
> Eric:
>
> I've always done my OS upgrades by ftp'ing everything under the RedHat
> dir (like instimage, RPMS, base) and booting from boot.img on a floppy and
> upgrading. This time I'm missing something and wouldn't mind trying the
> ISO's. I don't have a cd-writer so maybe this is impossible but thought I'd
> ask: Is there a way (once I've downloaded the ISO's into some linux dir) to
> access them as if they're mounted cd's and perform an upgrade from there?
> The obvious problem for me is that they're not where the upgrade floppy's
> are looking for them and I've got no idea how to boot from an ISO mounted
> image that's not on cd-rom.
>
> tia
> Mick
>
You could mount them on a second machine and perform a network install
(never did this myself, but I know it's possible) or copy everything
from the image to HDD and do a (local) harddisc install, but I don't
think you can mount the image on your local PC and install from there
(but I'm not 100% here)
Eric
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: X Fonts -- HELP
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:20:42 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vann wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dodd wrote:
> <snip>
> > I had this when I switched from XFree86-3.x to 4. Turned out you need
> > the fontpath where this fixed font is defined as the first fontpath
> > listed. This path is on my PC
> <snip>
>
> If he's upgrading from XFree86 3.x to XFree86 4.x, he wouldn't need xfstt,
> would he?
Very helpfull reply, isn't it.
It still doesn't change where the fixed font *IS* nor the fact that it
very likely must be placed as first in the fontserver. It may have to be
placed in some different file, but since I don't use xfstt, I don't know
where. Still I think it's a good pointer for him/her to look at. Far
more helpfull than your reply at least.
Eric
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Francis)
Subject: Re: Suggestions in Setting up RH7?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:23:17 GMT
But it will erase your hd completely?
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:52:34 -0400, "Michael Matthews"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>RH will partition your disk automatically if you select an install mode. Or
>it has a custom partitioning utility which is pretty simple to use.
>
>"Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am going to install RH7 in my computer. I decided to allocate 5GB to
>> install RH7. However, I have no experience how to partition the
>> system. Is there anyone kindly suggest me how to partition the hd?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Francis
>
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Partition Link Corrupted
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:36:42 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you post the result of fdisk -l /dev/hda
Eric
------------------------------
From: Eli Napchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: scsi ide linux and nt
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:37:02 +0100
I am trying to set up a machine with scsi hard disk and cd, and also
an ide disk. I would like it to have both linux and windows nt 4
server.
I would appreciate hearing any comments or suggestions. At the moment
I have a separate redhat 6 machine, which I need to part from, and
thus need to make the dual boot system.
Which would benefit more from the scsi? How should I look to partition
the hard disks: the scsi is 4.5 gbytes and the ide is 8 gbytes.
Thanks very much,
Eli
ps. I would appreciate a cc email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Quiney, Philip [HAL02:HH00:EXCH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: will autopoweroff in Linux allow remote access
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:32:17 +0100
mohanva wrote:
>
> I have not tried this - if I use apmd and am able to successfully put
> the computer on the standby mode - will I be able to access the
> computer remotely (my ethernet card seems to shut off when the computer
> goes into standby - this is 'cos while running Windows all telnet
> connections are broken if the comp goes into standby)
> Thanks
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
Hi,
I think this feature (aka 'wake on lan') requires a BIOS setting
together with a network card which supports it. Try looking in the BIOS
screen to do with power management & see if there are any options which
refer to 'wake on lan'. I don't know how you prove if your NIC supports
this...I believe I have seen a NIC with an extra internal wire which is
meant to plug in to the motherboard to wake it up - no idea of
make/model though. Maybe these new fangled PCI cards can do it without
the wire ;-)
I have just read through some 3COM documents for the 3C905B & it dosen't
mention this as a feature. I would guess then that the BIOS setting is
all that is needed.
A side effect of this is that the machine will not go into standby mode
if there is any network activity - probably not a problem on a home LAN
but on a corporate one - the network never sleeps ;-)
Regards
Phil Q
--
Phil Quiney CSIP Demonstrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nortel Networks,
Telephone: +44 (0)1279 402363 London Rd, Harlow,
Fax: +44 (0)1279 402885 Essex CM17 9NA,
United Kingdom.
"This message may contain information proprietary to Northern
Telecom so any unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution
of its contents is strictly prohibited."
------------------------------
From: george <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sendmail
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:10:07 -0000
how i can install and setup sendmail (smtp+pop3) ?
i want to use a mail server at my work
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: "Chang-Cheng (Eric) Chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help! Installing RH7.0 with windows 2000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:25:03 GMT
Hi, I wanted to upgrade my system so I first installed Windows 2000 on
one partition and install RH 7.0 on other partitions. Now, when RH7.0
ask me where to write the LILO information, I told it to write it in the
boot sector and that overwrite the boot manager of Windows 2000. Now,
when I chose 'dos' from the LILO screen, it just hangs. My guess is that
the boot manager of Windows 2000 is no longer operational. My question
is that how do I fix this problem?
Eric
------------------------------
From: zlbdaw***@***zoo.upe.ac.za (ragthorn)
Subject: HELP Linux install has hosed Win98
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 08:28:35 GMT
Although I still regard my self as a newbie (probably always will), I
have set up a couple of dual boot machines without trouble. Last
night however I came across a new problem - Installing Caldera Open
Linux (2.2) seems to have hosed my Win98 boot record or something.
The PC has 2 HDD's:
Disk1=32MB FAT16 (boot area), and ~3GB FAT32 (Win98)
Disk2=1.5 GB NTFS (NTW) , 3GB ext2 (Linux), and an extended partition
with Linux swap space.
All was working fantastically untill I decided to triple boot (which I
have done on other boxes without fuss). Not wanting to mess around
with the MBR, I decided to make LILO use a boot floppy, but directly
after installing it Win98 refuses to boot. NT works OK, as does
Linux, but Win98 is dead. When I try I get the following response:
***************
The following file is missing or corrupted: D:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
The following file is missing or corrupted: D:\WINDOWS\DBLBUFF.SYS
The following file is missing or corrupted: D:\WINDOWS\IFSHLP.SYS
The following file is missing or corrupted: WIN.COM
C:\>
Cannot find WIN.COM, unable to continue loading windows
C:\>
***************
and if I try do access the D:\ (where windows is loaded) I get told
"Invalid Drive Specification", which is DOS speak for "it doesn't
exist". The weird part is that both Linux's and DOS's FDISK see the
partition and correctly recognise that it is FAT32 and the right size.
Even weirder is that in NT using FAT32 for NT (from
www.sysinternals.com) correctly picks up the partition, and makes it
available (read-only though - its freeware), so the data is still all
there, but DOS can't see it.
Does any one here have any idea how I can get it working again?
Thanks in advance for all help.
Cheers.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: permissions, so confused
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:43:06 GMT
Okay, look. You can't run samba if you can't start it. If I am not
root, I can't start it...so I am a little screwed here unless I want
to su everything...
if I run
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start
I get "must have user ID of 0 to run" What is that...I mean, why do I
have to be root (ID of 0) to run smb???? I can do sharing, but I just
have to su the terminal to start smb servies and I have to su samba or
KDE explorer to get to the shares on teh windoze machine.
How do I give myself access...this is ridiculous, I am just going to
login as root all the time!
Thanks,
Dan Allen
------------------------------
From: "bluster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cant� connect to ISP
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:57:33 -0400
Henrik & Stine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey!
>
> I have for some days now tried to connect to my ISP thrugh an ordinary
> (proper) modem. In the Gnome/Enligtenment GUI I find the modem in a
program
> called internet connection. Its placed on /dev/ttyS0 and when I hit the
> debug button it dials-up fine (that is, I hear the usual noise). But then
> the show stops, and nothing more happens. The program says pppd has died
> (exit code = 1).
>
> When I look in /var/log/messages it says
>
> pppd[28662]:the remote system (ppp2) is required to authenticate itself
but
> I couldn�t find any suitable secret (password) for it to do so
> ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp2 on /dev/ttyS0 at 115200
> modprope: can�t locate module char-major-108
>
> These 3 lines are apparently repeated in the log-file for as long as I try
> to connect.
>
>
> The OS is RH 6.1 and I had everything up and running 6 months ago, but I
In Redhat you can setup the ppp connection using the linuxconf program
(as root) in linuxconf goto the:
"Config"-->"Client tasks"-->"PPP/SLIP/PLIP"
dialog screen, which has 3 parts (tabs) you'll be interested in
"Hardware" - modem settings (/dev/ttyS0) you may want to select
"allow any user to activate" here
"Communications" - modem dialup and login commands phone num, name, passwd
(be sure to select the "Debug Connection" box to make
it will log each step of login to the messages file)
"Networking" - can mostly leave these blank BUT
Make sure the "Set default route" box is selected!
Once It's setup you can start it from the linuxconf "control" section
or however you like (e.g. "usernet&", "ifup ppp0", or the gnome thing)
Hope this helps!
Bluster
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! Installing RH7.0 with windows 2000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:00:16 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chang-Cheng (Eric) Chao wrote:
>
> Hi, I wanted to upgrade my system so I first installed Windows 2000 on
> one partition and install RH 7.0 on other partitions. Now, when RH7.0
> ask me where to write the LILO information, I told it to write it in the
> boot sector and that overwrite the boot manager of Windows 2000. Now,
> when I chose 'dos' from the LILO screen, it just hangs. My guess is that
> the boot manager of Windows 2000 is no longer operational. My question
> is that how do I fix this problem?
>
> Eric
I did the same with NT and never encountered a problem. Where is dos
pointing to? (post lilo.conf and result of fdisk -l /dev/hda)
Eric
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
