Linux-Setup Digest #848, Volume #19 Tue, 17 Oct 00 17:13:11 EDT
Contents:
Re: Win2000 - Linux ("Terry Janas")
Re: xcdroast and DOS file permissions (mst)
Re: Redhat 6.2 : modprobe error after upgrading kernel to 2.2.16 (nullhero)
Re: Redhat 6.2 : modprobe error after upgrading kernel to 2.2.16 (nullhero)
Re: xcdroast and DOS file permissions (Lew Pitcher)
Halt not properly (Rafael - LumesITSupport)
Re: ADSL won't work on RH7 ("Kurt R. Rahlfs")
Linux / Smart2 Controllers (Paul Slinski)
Re: installing linux on win2k (Rod Smith)
Re: Linux Catch-22 (Rod Smith)
Re: Persistent password problem
Help!: BTTV + Hauppauge ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Partition help (Brian osborne)
Re: How do you install a NIC under RH 6.2? (Nick Rout)
Re: Halt not properly ("bluster")
Re: installing linux on win2k ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Download ARM Linux to Cirrus Logic EP7211 board ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: LILO help ! Default boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RH Kernel (Paul Kimoto)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply-To: "Terry Janas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Terry Janas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win2000 - Linux
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:11:33 -0500
Does BootManager try to call LILO off your root partition when you choose
Linux? I know in my case, I got a blackscreen unless I did the following:
Edit /etc/lilo.conf and make sure that the root= entry and the boot= entry
both point to the same partition.
Run lilo to install LILO on your root partition. Make sure it does not give
any error messages after this. For me, I had my root partition past the
1024 cylinder and LILO didn't like that. So I went into linuxconf and tried
to enable "linear mode" in the LILO setup. Then I ran LILO once again, and
for my case it still gave rrors. So my last try was to edit /etc/lilo.conf
and change the line that says "linear" to "lba32". I saved the new
lilo.conf file, ran LILO again, and no error messages. This may be a stab
in the dark, but I just wanted to give my 2 cents. Hope it works.
Terrence Bradley Janas
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
http://www.students.uiuc.edu/~tjanas
==============================
"So, is the glass half empty, half full, or just twice as
large as it needs to be?"
"Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8shm88$2df$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
> Win2000 installed, after this Linux installed. I put Linux in BootManager
> with the file bootsek.lin and an reference in boot.ini.
> After reboot, chosen Linux - black screen. Where can I search the
misstake?
> Any idea?
> -Chris
>
>
------------------------------
From: mst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: xcdroast and DOS file permissions
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:21:12 -0400
"Shan J. Gill" wrote:
>
> Can't seem to find an answer to what must be a very simple problem.
> I found one message that dealt with burning a Slackware CD from Windows that
> contained a hint to the answer I need.
>
> The message read, in part:
> "Why don't you just use xcdroast off the Slackware 4.0 /contrib directory?
> It preserves everything, with the correct permissions."
>
> This is the problem I am having: burning some Windows .txt files onto a CD
> from my Linux (RedHat 6.1 w/2.2.16 kernel) box.
>
> I can't seem to keep xcdroast from changing the permissions to "READ ONLY"
> for those few files. I tried setting the permissions by hand to root
> owner/group and all read/write. Anyway, I am not a *NIX expert - but I have
> been using Linux as my LAN backbone for about a year now and am comfortable
> with Linux.
>
> Joliet extensions; RockRidge extensions; ??? no combination seems to keep
> the permissions as r/w for all such that Windows still sees them as
> read/write.
>
> I put the files to be burned into an ext2 directory on my Linux box, then
> set permissions to r/w for all, and leave owner/group as root.
>
> What is the magic combination? I have burned about half a dozen CDs and
> can't afford any more of this kind of ad hoc stuff.
>
I don't really understand your problem. Does xcdroast change permissions
of the original files, on your hard drive? That's a bug if you ask me.
If you're concerned about the files on the cd you write being read-only,
just think about it, what would a "write" flag do on a read-only
filesystem such as iso9660? Also, when you verify your burn, the CD is
mounted read-only, and all files on it are seen as read-only.
MST
------------------------------
From: nullhero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.2 : modprobe error after upgrading kernel to 2.2.16
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:42:29 GMT
In article <8shn47$k9r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> did you rebuild the dependency database? I can't remember the command,
> it's something like dep*
I just upgraded the Kernel and I'm having the same problem. But I
thought that make dep took care of the dependency database?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: nullhero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.2 : modprobe error after upgrading kernel to 2.2.16
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:42:29 GMT
In article <8shn47$k9r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> did you rebuild the dependency database? I can't remember the command,
> it's something like dep*
I just upgraded the Kernel and I'm having the same problem. But I
thought that make dep took care of the dependency database?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: xcdroast and DOS file permissions
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:51:39 GMT
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:21:12 -0400, mst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Shan J. Gill" wrote:
>>
>> Can't seem to find an answer to what must be a very simple problem.
>> I found one message that dealt with burning a Slackware CD from Windows that
>> contained a hint to the answer I need.
>>
>> The message read, in part:
>> "Why don't you just use xcdroast off the Slackware 4.0 /contrib directory?
>> It preserves everything, with the correct permissions."
>>
>> This is the problem I am having: burning some Windows .txt files onto a CD
>> from my Linux (RedHat 6.1 w/2.2.16 kernel) box.
>>
>> I can't seem to keep xcdroast from changing the permissions to "READ ONLY"
>> for those few files. I tried setting the permissions by hand to root
>> owner/group and all read/write. Anyway, I am not a *NIX expert - but I have
>> been using Linux as my LAN backbone for about a year now and am comfortable
>> with Linux.
>>
>> Joliet extensions; RockRidge extensions; ??? no combination seems to keep
>> the permissions as r/w for all such that Windows still sees them as
>> read/write.
>>
>> I put the files to be burned into an ext2 directory on my Linux box, then
>> set permissions to r/w for all, and leave owner/group as root.
>>
>> What is the magic combination? I have burned about half a dozen CDs and
>> can't afford any more of this kind of ad hoc stuff.
IIRC, xcdroast invokes mkisofs and cdrecord under the covers to build
CDs. IIRC (again ;-) ), mkisofs defaults to "files are r--r--r--" and
"user/group not preserved". Have you checked the mkisofs settings?
Have you checked the contents of the ISO file before roasting (i.e.
mount it in a loopback fs, check each file's permission bits)?
>I don't really understand your problem. Does xcdroast change permissions
>of the original files, on your hard drive? That's a bug if you ask me.
>If you're concerned about the files on the cd you write being read-only,
>just think about it, what would a "write" flag do on a read-only
>filesystem such as iso9660? Also, when you verify your burn, the CD is
>mounted read-only, and all files on it are seen as read-only.
>
>MST
Lew Pitcher
Information Technology Consultant
Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: Rafael - LumesITSupport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Halt not properly
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:15:04 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can shutdown and halt my RedHat 7.0 properly. It stops at:
INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel
Thus it no unmount file system and than it takes a long time to start
again. Where the problem is. How to force it to shutdown properly
Rafael
------------------------------
From: "Kurt R. Rahlfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ADSL won't work on RH7
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:22:02 -0500
Rod Smith wrote:
> [Posted and mailed]
>
> In article <8sg0o6$a55$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I just installed RH7 on my p233 system. I've got a Kingston Ethernet
> > (PCI) (tulip driver) card installed, and pppoe will not connect to my
> > ADSL provider for me. Has anybody else had this problem and if so how
> > do I correct it.
>
> PPPoE is still fairly immature. Sometimes one PPPoE implementation works
> and another doesn't. If I'm not mistaken, RH 7 comes with the Roaring
> Penguin PPPoE client, which is fairly popular; but there are others.
> Check http://www.rodsbooks.com/network/network-dsl.html for a few links.
> If you continue to have problems, please post some more details -- most
> importantly, what DSL provider you're using. Also, be sure that your DSL
> provider actually USES PPPoE. Not all do.
>
> --
> Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.rodsbooks.com
> Author of books on Linux & multi-OS configuration
I had trouble with the linux driver that came with my Kingston PCI card and
ended up using another card since I had one on hand. Try to configure
your card to see if the OS recognizes it. BTW this is only to test the
card. If you use roaring penguin you don't want to configure and bring up
the card before running adsl-start. It will do all that for you.
I used the roaring penguin PPPoE client with SBC's Southwestern Bell ADSL
service and it came up right away. I am using SuSE 6.3. The PPPoE client
that came with it didn't work for me.
------------------------------
From: Paul Slinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux / Smart2 Controllers
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:20:40 -0400
We have a Compaq 3000 server with 3 18 gig SCSI drives on a Smart/2
controller. We have added 2 new drives to the array and expanded the
array using Compaq's tools. Now, I cannot find any information on
expanding the array under linux.
Has anyone done this with success before? Your input is appreciated!
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: installing linux on win2k
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:32:45 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aneesh Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> I am sorry abt the wrong use of the terminology. I have a sony vaio
> pcg-sr5k. It does not come with any
> floppy or cd-rom drives.It is running win2k, and has 2 partitions, so i was
> thinking of installing linux on the other partition.
This is reasonable. The difficulty is that, because the computer has no
way to boot from anything but the hard disk, you can't boot the Linux
installer (unless there's some program I don't know about that's a Win2K
equivalent of LOADLIN, or some way to set up a working DOS partition
from within Win2K). Your best bet is to search for some sort of external
*BOOTABLE* floppy or CD-ROM drive for the computer. Even if it's just a
floppy drive, you could boot an installer that would do the installation
via a network connection or from files stored on the NTFS partition.
> what kind of cd-rom drive should i buy for which both the win2k and linux
> drivers are available.if anyone has any ideas for pcmcia cd-rom drives
> please let me know.
The biggest issue will probably be finding something from which the
notebook will boot. Consult Sony about this, since it's a BIOS issue,
not a Linux or Win2K issue.
> I guess the only way i can install linux is thru a drive.
You need to be able to boot a Linux installer. Once that's done, you
need access to installation files, but that can be done over the
network, from files on a FAT or (possibly) NTFS partition, or from a
CD-ROM. Details differ from one distribution to another, though.
> Is it still possible to install 95 and then thru 95 install linux and
> then do away with linux.
If you could get DOS installed and booting, you might be able to put
together some sort of workaround. Some distributions might even directly
support such a configuration, but I've never looked into it myself.
> Btw can i install linux using a zip drive.
Some of the smaller ones might be installable this way. I doubt if you
could get a major distribution like Red Hat or Debian to install from a
Zip disk, though -- at least, not without a lot of hassle. They've just
got too many files (over 1GB for most new distributions).
--
Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux & multi-OS configuration
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: Linux Catch-22
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:39:35 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <8shdak$49l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to install some programs in rpm v4.X format. The current RH6.2 I
> am running does not support rpm's ver4.x. I have to download rpm ver 4. --
> but I can't seem to locate ver 4 rpm binaries in tarball or gz format. It is
> all distributed in rpm 4.x format - so this is the Linux-catch-22 ! I need
> rpm v4 binaries to install ver 4.x rpm program itself and this cannot be
> done?
I'd suggest you forget about RPM version 4 unless you see an official
update RPM from Red Hat. Instead, obtain the *SOURCE* RPM for the
package you want to install. You can then create a binary RPM that'll
install using your current version of rpm. You'd do something like this:
rpm --rebuild foo-x.y.z.src.rpm
mv /usr/src/RedHat/RPMS/i386/foo-x.y.z.i386.rpm ./
rpm -Uvh foo-x.y.z.i386.rpm
Depending upon the size of the package, the first command may take
anywhere from a few seconds to several minutes to run. You might also
need to install some development libraries, in addition to the run-time
libraries needed by the final compiled version of the program.
You can find both source and binary RPMs for many packages at
http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/.
--
Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux & multi-OS configuration
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Persistent password problem
Date: 17 Oct 2000 19:38:04 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc Ron Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> help. i'm confused.
> i have a linux redhat 6.2 (2.2.14-5.0smp) machine. in my /etc i have two
> files for passwords and shadows:
> chubba-<28> ls -al /etc/pass*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 576 Oct 12 22:27 /etc/passwd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 576 Oct 12 22:27 /etc/passwd-
> chubba-<29> ls -al /etc/shad*
> -r-------- 1 root root 545 Oct 12 22:27 /etc/shadow
> -r-------- 1 root root 545 Oct 12 22:27 /etc/shadow-
> first, what are these secondary files? "passwd-" and "shadow-"?
> second, why is my entry the only one that differs between the two?
> (entries below truncated for brevity and my peace of mind)
snip...
You changed your password... the "-" files are a backup.
As to being able to use BOTH passwords to log on -- are you
on NIS when your home is NFS mounted? If so, maybe one password
is the local password, and the other comes from NIS...
Ratboy666.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help!: BTTV + Hauppauge
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:03:40 GMT
Hi,
I'm getting crazy trying to have a Hauppauge WinTV PCI working under
SuSE 6.x / Linux 2.2.7
Under win95 Hauppauge support asked me to change both base memory audio
& video address
to the following, and it's working:
video: 78000000 - 78000FFF
audio: 78002000 - 78002FFF
IRQ9
my graphics card is a Diamond S3 Vision 968 PCI at IRQ11:
000C0000 - 000C7FFF
000A0000 - 000AFFFF
000B0000 - 000BFFFF
F8000000 - F9FFFFFF
Under Linux the card is detected but the base address seems bad (see
below).
the channel scans work but kwintv or xawtv show distorted images.
triton1 did'nt help
I've recompiled the module, I've also tried to use the vidmem parm but I
get an
"invalid parameter parm_vidmem"
any hints? thanks.
Olivier.
=============================================================
modprobe of bttv 0.6.4h:
================
Oct 15 22:48:44 texavery kernel: i2c: initialized
Oct 15 22:48:44 texavery kernel: i2c: driver registered: tuner
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: Linux video capture interface: v0.01
ALPHA
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv: Host bridge 82437FX Triton PIIX
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv0: Brooktree Bt878 (rev 17) bus: 0,
devfn: 72, irq: 9, memory: 0xfbfff000.
^^^^^^^^^ ?????
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: PCI: Enabling bus mastering for device
00:48
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv: Enabling 430FX compatibilty for
bt878
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv: 1 Bt8xx card(s) found.
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv0: Hauppauge eeprom: tuner=Philips
FI1216MF MK2 (3)
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: bttv0: model: BT878(Hauppauge new
(bt878))
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: i2c: bus registered: bt848-0
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: tuner: type is 3 (Philips SECAM)
Oct 15 22:48:46 texavery kernel: i2c: device attached: tuner (addr=0xc2,
bus=bt848-0, driver=tuner)
=========================================================
Hauppauge.txt:
==========
Model 38066 Rev. B409
Serial #3938646
Tuner Formats: PAL (B/G) / SECAM (L/L')
Tuner Audio: Mono
Video Formats: NTSC ( M ) PAL ( B G H I D K M N NCOMBO ) SECAM ( L L' )
Audio Outputs: BackPanel
External Inputs: 1
S-Video Inputs: 0
Teletext: Yes (Software)
Radio: None
Decoder: BT878
Tuner Model: Philips FI1216MF MK2
EEprom Contents:
84 12 00 00 05 50 0e 7f 24 09 01 b2 94 19 44 89 00 00 00 00 04
84 0a 00 01 01 20 77 00 40 56 19 3c 00
74 02 01 00 02
79 26
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Brian osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Partition help
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:01:10 GMT
Hi
I need some advice on partitioning my harddrive. I have a 15g drive
just for linux. I'm thinking about making seperate partitions for
swap
/var
/home
/usr
/boot
and /
I just dont know how big I should make each of them. I have 128m of ram
so what size should I make my swap partition?
Thank
greg
------------------------------
From: Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,linux.redhat.applixware,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm,redhat.security.general
Subject: Re: How do you install a NIC under RH 6.2?
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:21:13 +1300
netconfig (as root)
(I think)
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 03:46:57 GMT, "Lamar Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I installed the following NIC inside my PC, now what do I do?
>
>3Com EtherLink III 3C509B-TPO ISA 10Mbs card.
>
>I am running Linux as a Server with X Windows. Where do I go to install and
>configure the card? What are the setup steps? Thanks for your help.
>
>Lamar
>
>
------------------------------
From: "bluster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Halt not properly
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:39:52 -0400
Rafael - LumesITSupport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can shutdown and halt my RedHat 7.0 properly. It stops at:
> INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel
> Thus it no unmount file system and than it takes a long time to start
> again. Where the problem is. How to force it to shutdown properly
>
>
> Rafael
Check the file /var/log/messages. Near the bottom
of the file you should see a bunch of shutdown entries
that look something like this:
Font Server[680]: terminating
xfs: xfs shutdown succeeded
gpm: gpm shutdown succeeded
atd: atd shutdown succeeded
crond: crond shutdown succeeded
Follow on down looking for which thing does
*not* shut down ok.
If there are no error entries, then find
something that looks like this:
syslog: syslogd startup succeeded
The entries just before (above) that may lead you
to the thing that's broken.
Good luck,
Bluster
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: installing linux on win2k
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:39:20 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aneesh Aggarwal) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install redhat linux 7.0 on my laptop which is
currently
> running win2K using loadlin
This has come up many times. Do a deja search of this NG and
alt.os.linux.caldera and you will find everything you need to know.
Also, look for many good HOW-TOs on the subject - despite propaganda to
the contrary, it is the same as putting NT and Linux on the same
computer.
> ps please send a cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as i am not that a frequent
> visitor here.
Sorry, but if you can't be bothered to follow your own question, let
along the newsgroup, I can't be bothered to send you a copy (I don't
even see how to do it from deja.com, but I rarely use it, so I don't
know).
Tom
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Download ARM Linux to Cirrus Logic EP7211 board
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:42:07 GMT
Hi everyone,
I have a ARM Linux kernel but I do not know how to load it into
a Cirrus Logic EP7211 board and make it boot. Are there any
utility to do this? Thanks!
Cat
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LILO help ! Default boot
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:54:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:43:02 -0400, "bluster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to change the default management system (win98) I
>> entered at the LILO prompt when booting . What must I do to achieve
>> this ?
>>
>> An eager beginner
>> Jean-Pierre Trolet
>
>The setting you want is in the /etc/lilo.conf file. In there change
>the "default" line to point to the lilo "label" of the win boot
>(as defined in lilo.conf).
>
>Bluster
>
>
>
Thank you Bluster but in fact we have to alter the order between the
image block and the other block and then after saving execute
/sbin/lilo -v.
Jean-Pierre Trolet
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: RH Kernel
Date: 17 Oct 2000 17:04:13 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <8sheqo$60i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mick wrote:
> How do I find out what version is my kernel?
Run "uname -r".
> On the kernel.org archives site, there are lots of kernel binaries ...
> kernel.2.4.xxx-test-1 .... test-2...test-3....test-99 do I have to download
> all test gz's in order to upgrade from my RH6.2 CD version?
None of these are binary executables: they consist of compressed source
code. You need ONE of the linux-*.tar.gz files to start with (presumably
the most recent one known to work for you), and then you can use the
patch-*.gz files to make the necessary changes when new releases come out.
You should also remember that 2.4.0-test* is in _testing_, and that other
updates may be needed: see the Documentation/Changes file.
But first, please read the KERNEL HOWTO:
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO.html
--
Paul Kimoto
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text. Any images,
hyperlinks, or the like shown here have been added without my consent,
and may be a violation of international copyright law.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
