Linux-Setup Digest #916, Volume #19 Fri, 27 Oct 00 10:13:08 EDT
Contents:
Re: kde2 on Mandrake 7.1 - minor glitches (Eric Laffoon)
SuSE and SPARC not booting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: lilo and clusters (Nick Ruisi)
Re: wiping win98 (Nick Ruisi)
Re: cd-rom not recognized (Nick Ruisi)
Re: how to set time in linux (Nick Ruisi)
Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error ("ne...")
Re: XFree86 4.0.1 ("ne...")
Re: still kernel probs (Colin Watson)
Re: CDE!!! ("Ez-Aton")
integration of lp0 or lp1 (Burkhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=F6lfel?=)
Re: lilo and clusters ("Alim")
Re: startx ("Mick")
Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error (Colin Watson)
Re: lilo and clusters (Eric)
Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error ("Mick")
Reinstalled now GUI kde doesn't start aotomatically ("A-Need-to-Learn")
Re: lilo and clusters ("Alim")
INIT: No more process left in this runlevel ("Jack")
Printing 132x80 on HP LJ5000 (L S)
How can conect a Text Console to serial port? ("Falcon")
pam/gdm configuration ("Richard Robbins")
authentication on a pop-server ("Mike W�nscher")
Re: Printing 132x80 on HP LJ5000 (Robert Kiesling)
Re: wiping win98 ("Jason")
Re: lilo and clusters (Eric)
Re: INIT: No more process left in this runlevel (Eric)
Re: Burning CD for RH7: Does label matter? (Norman Baccari)
samba+radius+pam (J Hartmann)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Laffoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: kde2 on Mandrake 7.1 - minor glitches
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 04:21:10 -0700
D. D. Brierton wrote:
> I've just installed kde2. Very impressive it is too, and I'm pretty
> much a full-time GNOME user. However, I've had a couple of mandrake
> specific problems. Can anyone help?
>
> 1. In order to install kdebase I had to install mandrake_desk and now
> the only option available in either kdm or gdm is kde. I no longer
> have the option of starting GNOME, WindowMaker, BlackBox,
> Enlightenment, etc. This is a big problem for me. I use GNOME as my
> regular desktop---kde is something I use only about one third of the
> time in fact, although with kde2 that may change. I also fairly
> regularly start a vanilla X session with just Blackbox, or bask in
> the visual glory that is WindowMaker. Can anyone offer any advice as
> to what I need to tweak or install to get kdm and gdm back to
> offering the full range of installed options?
>
> 2. I am still using XFree86 3.3.6. kdemultimedia appears to require
> XFree86 4.0.1 (well, it says it requires libXaw.so.7 and
> XFree86-libs-4.0.1 seems to be its home). I have tried previously
> using XFree86 4 and it was not a happy experience for me so I'm
> stuck with 3.3.6. What would anyone recommend I do to get
> kdemultimedia installed? Is compiling from source my only option,
> or is there an rpm which does not depend on libXaw.so.7? If I
> install from source, can anyone advise on the configure options for
> maximum compatability with the kde2 rpms?
>
> I am using Mandrake 7.1 with all security updates installed, the
> latest version of Helix GNOME (including all most recent updates), and
> the kde2 rpms downloaded from the Mandrake 7.2beta ftp site.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Best,
>
> Darren
>
>
/etc/X11/window-managers sets up our menu for what desktop to load, but if
you loaded mdk 7.2 rpms for desktop you are really toasting things. 7.2 no
longer uses this, but other than producing incompatibilities with 7.1 I
can't find a reason. It seems mixing the two is nightmarish.
As far as I know it is possible to compile the multimedia files with X
3.3.6 although depending you may want to go to 4.0.1. I have instructions
for the update on my help page.
Although I am not much of a GNOME fan (My initial experiences with it were
back when it was a crash fest) I understand that Helix is a landmark for
ease of installation. (even if it is a depressing color scheme ;) While KDE
does not currently have quite so easy an install it may be moot for many
because they will get it installed with their distro. Still, I like the
control of installing from source. I have instructions for the total prep
and install here along with tips on XFree86 too.
Note that if you install in other than /usr you lose the debian menus which
was a plus for me. Since you use multiple desktops you can probably edit
the /etc/menu-methods/kde* files to enable them if you want. Then again
kmenuedit can add your other favorite programs easily too.
Note that you can import gtk themes too and... KDE has been knocked for
visuals but try blending background gradients with images on the desktop
for amazing visuals. Also note the single click everywhere and other nice
features. (double click came from the Mac one button mouse and MS true to
form copied it to windoze and did not even use the right button until win95
when they looked at the OS/2 interface... so why double click and get
carpal tunnel on Linux with 3 buttons?)
BTW you will see a lot of new and exciting software come to KDE now because
no matter how you view the arguments about design between supporters of the
two desktops one fact is not in dispute. The KDE paradigm is more
productive to program in, but with KDE 2 it jumps by orders of magnitude.
It is just a matter of developers becoming familiar with it however a lot
of projects are in the works. It just looks exciting!
here is my help page
http://virtualartisans.com/linux/mandrake/
BTW check out our KDE 2 app, Quanta (see below)
Enjoy ;-)
--
Eric Laffoon
A member of the Quanta+ Web development team
http://quanta.sourceforge.net
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE and SPARC not booting
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:15:14 GMT
I installed SuSE 7 on a SPARC Ultra 5 yesterday - installation went
fine, booted from the CD and ran YAST etc, then when I went to reboot
it wouldn't boot - gets as far as:
Boot device: a File and args:
Warning: Fcode sequence resulted in a net stack depth change of 1 The
file loaded does not appear to be executable
and does no more. From mooching around Deja I gather that this may mean
that the machine thinks there's been a hardware change - at a guess,
does the mbr need to be flashed to the eeprom?
I've got some experience of Linux on Intel boxes, but none whatsoever
of Sun machinery and no manuals. Any ideas anyone?
TIA
Ben
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo and clusters
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:38:59 -0400
~snip~
My RHCE book says NTLDR has to cascade to LILO.
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: wiping win98
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:45:53 -0400
If you are looking to install linux, just use linux fdisk...
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cd-rom not recognized
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:48:39 -0400
Just press [TAB] at the boot prompt and you should get a list of boot
options. One of them will give you the option to insert a driver disk (I
think it's "dd", but I'm not certain). I assume you have read the
CDROM/Howto before attempting this......
Banshee Bob wrote:
>
> Help. :-) I threw together a computer from old parts lying around my room,
> and want to install linux on it. Problem I'm having is that the system will
> not boot from cd-rom. I created a boot disk from the cdrom.img file but
> still no go. The system keeps trying to boot from floppy. The cd-rom is an
> old panasonic cr-562b or something. It is NOT an IDE cd-rom, it has it's
> own proprietary card. The boot: prompt is staring me in the face and I
> don't know how to pass on the info to boot from the cd-rom. My IO is 0x340h
> and the IRQ is 9. I tried cd=0x340h,9 in a futile kind of guess. :-)
>
> Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to set time in linux
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:43:27 -0400
Do this:
[root]# linuxconf
~and~
Choose "set date and time"
or if you are in X
[root]# timetool
------------------------------
From: "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:19:55 GMT
On Oct 27, 2000 at 17:15, Mick eloquently wrote:
>#XFree86 -version gives
>XFree Version 4.0.1 / X Window System
>Protocol version 11, version 0, .......
>
>#rpm -i /mnt/cdrom/NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5.i386.rpm gives:
>
>error: failed dependencies:
>XFree86 >= 4.0.1 is needed by NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5
>
>What causes this? I have successfully installed XFree86 4.0.1 as indicated
>by version query above?
As you stated in a previous post, you installed X from tarbols.
Therefore it is not registered in the rpm database. To install
that rpm use the --nodeps option. If this fails, try the --force
option but all bets are off.
--
Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org)
The difference between dogs and cats is that dogs come when they're
called. Cats take a message and get back to you.
8:18am up 5 days, 15:10, 9 users, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
------------------------------
From: "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:24:47 GMT
On Oct 27, 2000 at 17:17, Mick eloquently wrote:
>I just recently installed XFree86 4.0.1 via tag.gz files since I am unable
>to usr the rpms (I have RH6.2 and rpm only works for v3).
>
>During installation I replied "n" to replace config files. Install went ok,
>but gave problems such as running xf86cfg gives error:
>
>Widget work has zero length and/or height? and it aborts!.
>
>Install again but reply "y" to replace all config files. Installation went
>ok and I edited XF86Config to correct for mouse and the fontpaths.
>
>On reboot, it got even worse - now gnome will not run -
>xsm runs instead and gives me the equivalent of Win98 "safe-mode" - How can
>I fix this? What configs need to be corrected?
Remember, _ALL_ config files got replaced. Therefore you
will have to edit the ones in place to look like the ones
you had before. Start in /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession.
[...]
--
Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org)
Necessity has no law.
-- St. Augustine
8:20am up 5 days, 15:12, 9 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Subject: Re: still kernel probs
Date: 27 Oct 2000 12:26:51 GMT
Brian J. Rohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded kernel 2.2.16-22 form www.tux.org. i then extracted the file
>into /usr/src. I then went to /usr/src/lnux and edited the makefile line CC
>=$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -D_KERNEL_ -I$ (HPATH) to kgcc
>
>I then saved the new file, and went to /usr/src/linux and typed: make dep
>clean bzlilo modules modules_install
>after a few seconds I received an error message about the
>/usr/src/linux/drivers directory
Sounds like you just downloaded the kernel headers but not the kernel
source, or something. Does the /usr/src/linux/drivers directory exist?
If so, get the full kernel source. If not, exactly what error message
did you see?
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"... a good part of the remainder of my life was going to be
spent in finding errors in my own programs." - Maurice Wilkes
------------------------------
From: "Ez-Aton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.developement.system
Subject: Re: CDE!!!
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:26:06 +0200
Well, CDE does suck, but it has it's own advantages. You cannot access any
hardware related settings with it.
Oh, and if you happen to have a sun, don't install the language pack. It
killed one of my coworkers xfs... hehehe :-)
Ez.
"Marc D. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:37:51 +0100, Jeepster wrote:
> >Try here for a free implementation...
> >
> >http://www.xfce.org/
> >
> Although it has a CDE-like panel it's hardly an implementation
> of CDE. There's a lot more to CDE than that.
> Far as I know there is no free version of CDE yet (will there be?).
>
> Note: XFce is a fave of mine so I'm not knocking it.
>
>
> --
> >>ANIME SENSHI<<
>
> Marc D. Williams
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oldskool.org/~tvdog/ -- DOS Internet & Tandy 1000
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Platform/8269/ -- Win3.x Makeover
------------------------------
From: Burkhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=F6lfel?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: integration of lp0 or lp1
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:11:54 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all
how can i integrate my (canon bjc2000) printer into the dev section?
i can't find the solution in the distributed documentation somehow.
which manual would you recommend? is it available online?
thank you, butch
------------------------------
From: "Alim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo and clusters
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:34:47 +0100
Does that mean that I must install NTLDR in /dev/hde then lilo on /dev/hde1?
Obviously I could just omit lilo if only one kernel was there.
How do I install NTLDR without NT though? Does the windows 2000 repair
process allow for just installing NTLDR or how would you recommend doing it?
Thanks and sorry for all the question marks!
alim
------------------------------
From: "Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: startx
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 20:29:47 -0700
Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error
Date: 27 Oct 2000 12:31:50 GMT
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>#XFree86 -version gives
>XFree Version 4.0.1 / X Window System
>Protocol version 11, version 0, .......
>
>#rpm -i /mnt/cdrom/NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5.i386.rpm gives:
>
>error: failed dependencies:
>XFree86 >= 4.0.1 is needed by NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5
>
>What causes this? I have successfully installed XFree86 4.0.1 as indicated
>by version query above?
Package dependencies only work if you don't bypass the packaging system
and install things yourself. 'rpm -q XFree86' will tell you what version
the package management system thinks you have installed.
If you can't get the newer XFree86 packages installed due to Red Hat
changing their package format, I'm told there's an interim release of
rpm available somewhere at ftp.redhat.com which is itself in the old
format (so can be installed on older systems) but can install packages
in the new format. (I don't know exactly where it is, I'm afraid, but I
would hope it's in a reasonably obvious place.)
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If I had mayonnaise I'd be dangerous.
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo and clusters
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:43:25 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alim wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how I would be able to boot Windows 2000 from about 11Gb
> into a disk using lilo? I have Redhat at the beginning of the disk, then a
> FAT32 sharing drive and then NTFS, which is now inaccessible. NTLDR had no
> probs, but I'd rather use lilo.
>
> Alim
I believe there can be some problems when NT uses the FAT32 partition
too.
Have you tried to point LILO to the FAT partition or to the NTFS
partition?
Try the other one :-)
Eric
------------------------------
From: "Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.1 / RPM unusual error
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 20:49:33 -0700
Yes RH has a so claimed version RPM-3.5.9 which is supposed to use RPM3.xx
to install RPM v4.xx - but itself does not install on the standard RH6.2
release.
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8tbsjm$emd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >#XFree86 -version gives
> >XFree Version 4.0.1 / X Window System
> >Protocol version 11, version 0, .......
> >
> >#rpm -i /mnt/cdrom/NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5.i386.rpm gives:
> >
> >error: failed dependencies:
> >XFree86 >= 4.0.1 is needed by NVIDIA_GLX-0.9-5
> >
> >What causes this? I have successfully installed XFree86 4.0.1 as
indicated
> >by version query above?
>
> Package dependencies only work if you don't bypass the packaging system
> and install things yourself. 'rpm -q XFree86' will tell you what version
> the package management system thinks you have installed.
>
> If you can't get the newer XFree86 packages installed due to Red Hat
> changing their package format, I'm told there's an interim release of
> rpm available somewhere at ftp.redhat.com which is itself in the old
> format (so can be installed on older systems) but can install packages
> in the new format. (I don't know exactly where it is, I'm afraid, but I
> would hope it's in a reasonably obvious place.)
>
> --
> Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> If I had mayonnaise I'd be dangerous.
------------------------------
From: "A-Need-to-Learn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Reinstalled now GUI kde doesn't start aotomatically
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:06:45 +0100
Hi Folks,
I had to reinstall due to a bug in the kde. Unfortuantely my CDROM (was
borrowed and now scratched) failed to install XFree86.... I have managed to
fix this (finally) but don't know how to start the GUI automatically. Can
someone please tell me what I need [startx??] and the best script to put it
in so that it starts automatically.
TIA
Ian Turnbull
0961 931941
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : www.turnbui.freeserve.co.uk
------------------------------
From: "Alim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo and clusters
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:52:07 +0100
The fat partition has no OS on it. I *had*:
hde1: win98SE
hde3: FAT32 share for 98 to read docs from win2k
hde5: Win2k.
Now, after resolving hardware issues with linux, I have:
hde1: RedHat 7
hde3: FAT32 share (no OS)
hde5: NTFS with win2000
If all else fails, I will delete 2000 and backup the shared FAT32 then bring
2000 forward on the disk and recopy the shared docs. A bit of a mission, but
unless I learn how to install NTLDR on its own (that allows booting far from
the initial clusters) it's how things will have to be.
alim
------------------------------
From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: INIT: No more process left in this runlevel
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:29:08 +0100
After an unsuccessful attempt to configure X on my Toshiba laptop X
using Xconfigutor, I now have: (and the system stops at this error)
INIT: No more process left in this runlevel
Rebooting with Linux 2, 3, 4 and 5 produce the same result.
The system stops at the above error without a login prompt.
I can boot with linux 1, what can I do from here.
If its the /etc/inittab what need to edited or corrected.
Many thanks in advance
------------------------------
From: L S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Printing 132x80 on HP LJ5000
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:09:15 GMT
Hi,
I have an HP 5000 LJ on an Intel print server. I want to give
a command like:
pr -e4 -f -w132 -l80 <some file> | lpr -<something>
and have lpr switch the LJ from 80x60 to 132x80, print
compressed print (17cpi?) and then return the printer to
default lpi and cpi. This is also a postscript printer and
I have "lp" configured as such in printtool. PS works great
for man pages, etc. but I want 132x80 for pr output (code
listings).
What is the cleanest way to do this?--Hack a filter for a new
printer name in printcap?
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: "Falcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: How can conect a Text Console to serial port?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:34:43 +0200
Hi .
I have a text console and I interesting to attach it to my RedHat in the
seria port.
HardWare :
VISA Text Console
HP PC Vectra VE
DB 25 to DB 9 serial cable.
------------------------------
From: "Richard Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: pam/gdm configuration
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:17:48 GMT
I want to be able to login as root from a GDM session where the display is
not on the host machine. My understanding is that the AllowRoot setting in
gdm.conf is ignored on PAM enabled machines. What do I need to change in
one of the files in the /etc/pam.d directory?
I am running RedHat 7.0
-- Rich
------------------------------
From: "Mike W�nscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Subject: authentication on a pop-server
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:27:12 +0200
Hi all!
I use postfix mail system. To enable all the users to fetch their mail, I
use the qpopper program.
Is there any solution to use the mail alias, specified in the virtual map
for authentication on the pop3 login? Usually only the linux system account
is used for authenticating.
Thanks for help.
Mike
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: Printing 132x80 on HP LJ5000
From: Robert Kiesling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:38:34 GMT
L S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I have an HP 5000 LJ on an Intel print server. I want to give
> a command like:
>
> pr -e4 -f -w132 -l80 <some file> | lpr -<something>
>
> and have lpr switch the LJ from 80x60 to 132x80, print
> compressed print (17cpi?) and then return the printer to
> default lpi and cpi. This is also a postscript printer and
> I have "lp" configured as such in printtool. PS works great
> for man pages, etc. but I want 132x80 for pr output (code
> listings).
>
> What is the cleanest way to do this?--Hack a filter for a new
> printer name in printcap?
You could hack a ghostscript configuration to use the appropriate
monospaced font. To use the HP's built-in fonts, I don't know of
existing filters that do that sort of retro, fixed-width formatting.
You can simply copy an existing /etc/printcap entry, adjusting for the
132-column width. Set "if=<path-to-filter> or "of=<filter>" in
/etc/printcap if it's an older lpd, or whatever configuration file
lprng uses, respectively, depending on the existing configuration, in
whatever language you feel most comfortable writing complex escape
sequenc with.
--
Robert Kiesling
Linux FAQ Maintainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mainmatter.com/linux-faq/toc.html http://www.mainmatter.com/
------------------------------
From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: wiping win98
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:50:10 GMT
Oh ya I keep forgetting about that one. Must be the Windows background.
Thanks Nick
Jason
"Nick Ruisi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
| If you are looking to install linux, just use linux fdisk...
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo and clusters
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:58:20 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alim wrote:
>
> The fat partition has no OS on it. I *had*:
> hde1: win98SE
> hde3: FAT32 share for 98 to read docs from win2k
> hde5: Win2k.
Where is hde2??????
> Now, after resolving hardware issues with linux, I have:
> hde1: RedHat 7
> hde3: FAT32 share (no OS)
> hde5: NTFS with win2000
>
> If all else fails, I will delete 2000 and backup the shared FAT32 then bring
> 2000 forward on the disk and recopy the shared docs. A bit of a mission, but
> unless I learn how to install NTLDR on its own (that allows booting far from
> the initial clusters) it's how things will have to be.
>
> alim
Adding this to your lilo.conf does not work:
other=/dev/hde5
label=NT
and now rerunning /sbin/lilo
Are you sure that NT didn't write anything on the win98 partition?
I've read that some system files will be allocated there.
Eric
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: INIT: No more process left in this runlevel
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:59:18 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jack wrote:
>
> After an unsuccessful attempt to configure X on my Toshiba laptop X
> using Xconfigutor, I now have: (and the system stops at this error)
>
> INIT: No more process left in this runlevel
>
> Rebooting with Linux 2, 3, 4 and 5 produce the same result.
> The system stops at the above error without a login prompt.
> I can boot with linux 1, what can I do from here.
> If its the /etc/inittab what need to edited or corrected.
>
> Many thanks in advance
post the content of /etc/inittab
Eric
------------------------------
From: Norman Baccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Burning CD for RH7: Does label matter?
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:43:38 GMT
oSophos wrote:
>
> No.. the label doesn't matter.....
> but, why would you want to change them?
> they come already defined in the ISO (image)...
> and they work perfect......
> so.. if there is no real need.. dont' touch!
> chau,
> oSophos
Reason I ask is 'cause Im totally new to burning cd's.
Im using the software that comes with the HP8100 CDRW
I realize now that I should be "copying" the image
file to the CD but when I do this with the Adaptec
copier that came with the burner it doesn't recognize
the .iso file, complaining that its not a valid
Adaptec cd image file (.cif), and this seems to be the
only image file option for copying. Is there some other
software on the net I can use to copy these images??
Thanks IA!!
Norm Baccari
------------------------------
From: J Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba+radius+pam
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:08:20 +0100
Hi,
could anybody please give me some examples about configuring samba with
radius authentication.
Already I have setup pam_radius_auth.so however samba does not use this.
PAM support is compiled into samba.
Thanks
JH
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
