Linux-Setup Digest #488, Volume #20 Wed, 24 Jan 01 06:13:09 EST
Contents:
Re: VMWare: Problem installing guest OS Win98 (Steve Withers)
Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Suse 7.0 hangs with Kernel 2.4.0 (Dirk Emmermacher)
TCP_NODELAY / Nagle ("Zayin Krige")
Installing mulinux on a different device (Eugene Kang)
Disable an adress with netscape (Fabrice Bazetoux)
Re: "unable to mount root fs" seems common prob.... (Eric)
Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc) (David)
Re: LILO: What am I doing wrong? (Eric)
Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc) (Eric)
Re: Installing Linux 6.2 with Windows 2000/NT 4.0 (Eric)
Re: Disable an adress with netscape (David)
Re: configuring Network settings w/ linuxconf (elmig)
Re: What am I doing wrong? ("castro62")
Re: reiserfs, utilitys package please (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
Quad Xeon Box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Disable an adress with netscape (Fabrice Bazetoux)
Re: Disable an adress with netscape (David)
Re: Delaying eth0 initialization? (Kevin Davis�)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Re: VMWare: Problem installing guest OS Win98
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:10:19 +1300
> Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > I have been trying to install Win98 as a guest host on my Linux system.
> > The partition I plan to use for Win98 is /dev/hda3. I have tried toggling
> the
> > partition id to FAT16, ext2 and FAT12.
> >
> > I am trying to install the Win98 on a virtual disk and not to a raw
> partition.
If you want a virtual disk, then you really want a file on your Linux
partition. Mine is in my /home/steve/vm directory.
If you want to put the Win98 system onto /dev/hda3, then you will have
to specify raw disk.......
Virtual disk is easy and you don't have to mess with your
partitions....but it is limited to 2GB (per virtual disk - you can have
multiple virtual disks). It doesn't start at 2GB...but it can grow up to
that.
Steve
--
Regards,
Steve Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux user #24688
http://counter.li.org
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 07:24:09 GMT
Tnx!
I'll give that a try, I thought it would be something in
the /usr/src/linux subdir's that I must change before making a new
kernel.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > How do I change the default max-files in /proc when I compile the
> > kernel? (2.2.x)
> >
> > I asked this question about 3 months ago and nobody replied, I can't
> > find any info on the WWW or in the kernel doc's (perhaps I'm not
> > looking correctly)
> >
> > I'm definately not going to echo "65536" to /proc via the crontab
> > (rubbish solution)
>
> Then use /etc/sysctl.conf to do it.
>
> --
> Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
> Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
> ID # 123538
> Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Dirk Emmermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Suse 7.0 hangs with Kernel 2.4.0
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:27:39 +0100
Hello list,
I've got a problem after upgrade from Kernel 2.2.16 to 2.4.0
Its a fresh installation, so I don't have any other patches in use.
On booting, there come a message:
Uncompressing kernel...Ok Booting linux
After this the server freeze. Only a poweroff is possible.
Any ideas?
Thanx in advance.
Dirk Emmermacher
Lowersaxony gymnastics federation
------------------------------
From: "Zayin Krige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TCP_NODELAY / Nagle
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:31:06 +0200
How do i disable nagle checking in my kernel? I can seem to find it
--
Zayin Krige
/*----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.redpoint.co.za
Redpoint Solutions (Pty) Ltd
========================================*/
------------------------------
From: Eugene Kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Installing mulinux on a different device
Date: 24 Jan 2001 07:37:42 GMT
How would I get mulinux to install on a device other than a floppy?
I'd like to install it onto a 4MB flashcard..
thanks!
------------------------------
From: Fabrice Bazetoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Disable an adress with netscape
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:44:36 +0100
Hello,
i'm searching for a tool that can disable some internet adresses under
Netscape.
I've tried ipchains in order to dosable some ip adresses but the problem
is that there is a proxy, and everything is send to the proxy so i can't
do it...
Someone has an idea ??
PS : And i would like to known if there exists a tool that can disable
popup under Netscape
Thanks
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "unable to mount root fs" seems common prob....
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:30:02 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> OK, i will try a real install on a partition. Did you ever hear of
> FIPS to partition a drive without losing data? Do you recommend using
> it?
>
Yes I heard of it, but I've never used it.
It will be non-destructive(Your data should be safe).
You must defrag the disc first though.
Anything you do to a partitiontable is in principle dangerous though.
Backup if you want to be sure.
If you have the money to spare, you can consider buying partition magic.
It's an easier to use tool, and in my expierience very reliable.
Eric
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:44:48 GMT
There is a sysctl.conf on my Slakware installation (the Mandrake one
seems to not have it).
What should I add?
In article <94lvun$ftq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tnx!
>
> I'll give that a try, I thought it would be something in
> the /usr/src/linux subdir's that I must change before making a new
> kernel.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > How do I change the default max-files in /proc when I compile the
> > > kernel? (2.2.x)
> > >
> > > I asked this question about 3 months ago and nobody replied, I
can't
> > > find any info on the WWW or in the kernel doc's (perhaps I'm not
> > > looking correctly)
> > >
> > > I'm definately not going to echo "65536" to /proc via the crontab
> > > (rubbish solution)
> >
> > Then use /etc/sysctl.conf to do it.
> >
> > --
> > Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
> > Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
> > ID # 123538
> > Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:43:29 GMT
Hmm... There isn't a sysctl.* file in the /etc directory, it seems that
the doc's only go on about being able to change it at runtime, not
permanently for a new kernel....
In article <94lvun$ftq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tnx!
>
> I'll give that a try, I thought it would be something in
> the /usr/src/linux subdir's that I must change before making a new
> kernel.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > How do I change the default max-files in /proc when I compile the
> > > kernel? (2.2.x)
> > >
> > > I asked this question about 3 months ago and nobody replied, I
can't
> > > find any info on the WWW or in the kernel doc's (perhaps I'm not
> > > looking correctly)
> > >
> > > I'm definately not going to echo "65536" to /proc via the crontab
> > > (rubbish solution)
> >
> > Then use /etc/sysctl.conf to do it.
> >
> > --
> > Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
> > Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
> > ID # 123538
> > Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:38:32 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> There is a sysctl.conf on my Slakware installation (the Mandrake one
> seems to not have it).
>
> What should I add?
Take the amount of physical memory that you have divide by 4 multiply it
by 256
Example: 64 MB Ram
64/4*256=4096
That will give you the file-max you can have. Then you would add a line
like this to /etc/sysctl.conf.
fs.file-max = 4096
But to increase the file-max you must also increase the inode-max which
is done by multiplying the file-max by 4
4096*4=16384
And you would add this line to sysctl.conf
fs.inode-max = 16384
Ok I know I didn't have to go into all the detail and I know there is
more than one way to get the same results, but you get the idea.
Best of luck
--
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LILO: What am I doing wrong?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:40:11 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Miles McLoughlan wrote:
>
> I have Windows 2000 installed on hda1 and the linux (RH7) root on hdb1. I
> have LILO loaded into hdb1. I have copied the hdb1 boot sector (via floppy)
> to my Windows 2000 root folder (c:\) and put an entry in boot.ini. However
> it hangs at "LI" when I choose Linux from the Win2k boot loader.
>
> Can I boot Linux on hdb1 from hda1 in this fashion?
>
first of all, run /sbin/lilo again,
and try to use the newly written bootsector from NT once more.
if that fails show me,
`fdisk -l /dev/hd[ab]`
and
`cat /ect/lilo.conf`
Eric
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: changing default max-files?? (*NOT* via echo to /proc)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:42:47 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As always when you want something like this:
You have the sourcetree.
run a find/grep combination and find where it is defined.
Then change it, and recompile.
Eric
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing Linux 6.2 with Windows 2000/NT 4.0
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:46:32 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For installing Linux, I erased the last partitions of the second hard-disk (5 Gb
> of space). I started the Linux installation, but when I'm creating my
> linux-partitions (using disk-druid) I get the error that the boot partition is
> too big.
/boot should be entirely below cyl. 1024
Otherwise you may have problems booting.
Eric
------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disable an adress with netscape
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:46:48 GMT
Fabrice Bazetoux wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i'm searching for a tool that can disable some internet adresses under
> Netscape.
> I've tried ipchains in order to dosable some ip adresses but the problem
> is that there is a proxy, and everything is send to the proxy so i can't
> do it...
>
> Someone has an idea ??
What kind of addresses? Like doubleclick or flycast.com or something
like that?
> PS : And i would like to known if there exists a tool that can disable
> popup under Netscape
If your talking about the pesky popup windows you need to disable java
script.
edit/preferences/advanced/enable javascript
--
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (elmig)
Subject: Re: configuring Network settings w/ linuxconf
Date: 24 Jan 2001 10:11:04 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Schutte) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Hi, I have been trying to get my cable modem to work in Mandrake 7.1 and
>have recently had it attached though a PCI linksys ethernet adaptor. It
>looks as though this card is properly installed and my last step will be
>configuring network settings (IP addresss, etc). Can all the needed
>configuring be done in linuxconf? I have tried stepping through
>linuxconf's Network Settings windows, but have been confused by much of
>what they ask for. Anyone know any good tutorials out there on the web,
>I have looked around and can't seem to find exactly what I need help
>with - most seem to deal with kppp and similar things I won't need to
>bother with.
>Thanks in advance,
>ken
>
>
I've configured all the network stuff just folowwing the Network-HOWTO. Get
it on htpp://www.linuxdoc.org
It's really easy, good luck
+--------------------------------+
|elmig |
|http://www.alunos.ipb.pt/~ee3931|
|Luis.Figueiredo AT pt.bosch.com |
+--------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: "castro62" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:16:04 -0000
Carlos is right, that slution works perfectly
(I have this setup at home),
In the case you have a scsi adapter you must add
the "linear" parameter in /etc/lilo.conf
You can also try this to use the win2k loader to load linux
while in linux, enter command:
dd if=/dev/hdb1 of=/dev/fd0H1440 bs=512 count=1
adjust the entry /dev/hdb1 to point to your linux boot disk/partition
this gives you a "boot" disk which will boot your linux directly from
floppy
dd if=/dev/hdb1 of=/boot/boot.lnx bs=512 count=1
This gives you a "boot" sector in the form of a file in /boot
boot into Win 2000 and copy the file boot.lnx to c:\
edit the file boot.ini to read something like this:
[boot loader]
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT="Microsoft Windows 2000
Professional" /fastdetect
c:\boot.lnx="Redhat Linux 6.2"
(just add the line for the linux)
Now when you boot, you will have a choice from the Win 2000 loader to boot
either:
Windows 2000 Professional
Red hat Linux 6.2
this assumes that you installed linux with
lilo in the linux boot partition and not C:\ master boot record
It is also very important that if you do any reconfiguring in lilo, do this
procedure again before rebooting, otherwise, the old boot sector will not
work
"Miles McLoughlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:94kuqu$841$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have Windows 2000 installed on hda1 and the linux (RH7) root on hdb1. I
> have LILO loaded into hdb1. I have copied the hdb1 boot sector (via
floppy)
> to my Windows 2000 root folder (c:\) and put an entry in boot.ini. However
> it hangs at "LI" when I choose Linux from the Win2k boot loader.
>
> Can I boot Linux on hdb1 from hda1 in this fashion?
>
> Miles
>
>
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: reiserfs, utilitys package please
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:34:32 +0100
On 24 Jan 2001, Gene Heskett wrote:
> RBH> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfs-utils-3.6.25.ta
> RBH> r.gz
>
> Hummmm, when I got there with a different browser, there was a readme
> that said the 3.x.0a was the latest stuff, so I got the 3.x.0b package
> which was 3 days newer. :-)
Hmmm... Perhaps I should update my utils then :-)
> I'll keep that in mind. One thing I don't like is that while it doing
> this copying, the whole system locks for about 1, sometimes 2 seconds,
> apparently while the journal is actually being flushed. Its doing this
> about every 15 seconds, emphasis on the *about*. At read rates hdparm
> says are 28mb/sec, I'd assume write rates are similar. hdparm says I'm
> stuck in 16 bit transfer mode, on a 33 mhz bus, using an ata100 card.
> That noise you hear is how bad *that* Sucks.
You should be able to correct with hdparm. If it is a decent controller
and drive (ie. supported in Linux), you should be possible to enable
DMA and 32bit mode in hdparm.
> If and when it gets done, the first thing I'll hit it with is
> reiserfsck, it can't do anything to me that a mke2fs can't fix. I think
> the hardware is ok though, but this is of course within earshot of
> murphy as we all know oh so well :-)
Don't worry about my abbling about broken hardware. The main board was
exchanged and since then (1.5 months ago) it has been running
flawlessly. And some ungentle souls turned the power hard off about 10
times or so without giving problems.
> It got done, then reiserfsck after unmounting it. This is gonna take
> weeks, the 'sematics' check is listing it file by file! Or is it,? by
> golly its done! In about a minute 45 for about 9 gigs of data, no
> errors, not too shabby IMO. This version claimed it was doing a
> read-only check, but I suppose it would have asked for write perms had
> it found something wrong.
One of the points with reiserfs is, that fsck should not be necessary.
It automatically fixes problems at mount time. reiserfsck should only be
used when the problems cannot be fixed at boot time. No harm should be
done - it's just a waste of time.
> Educational at least. But I wouldn't like those system freezes when I'm
> online grabbing a big file, I'm sure it would be trashed from buffer
> overruns in the seriel port hardware.
>
> Have other Reiserfs users noted these freezes too?
In fact I have. When unpacking large .tar.gz files with thousands of
files inside, it freezes shortly at times. Well, the system does not
freeze totally; just disk-IO. But never had problems with it - it has
always continued fine.
Never experianced when copying large files though; only with lots of
small files.
Rasmus B�g Hansen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Quad Xeon Box
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:31:19 GMT
Hi,
We (my research group) are looking to invest in a small scale, parallel
architecture in order to run a parallel C compiler
which supports OpenMP such as the portland group compiler. We will be
running Linux on this box as we are UNIX based and
have the greatest experience in Linux and Solaris. We are not over
concerned with getting the best performance as this system will be used
for code experimentation. The task of spec'ing the machine has fallen
to me. I have checked out
what the bigger players have to offer and there seems to be quite a few
offering Quad Xeon II or III units. If I understand
correct a 2.2.xx Linux kernel with SMP support should have no problems
running reasonably efficiently on such as box (?)
What I would like are any `pearls of wisdom' from people who have done
this kind of thing before. In particular;
What are the problems we are likely to encounter?
Are there any hardware configurations which people have found
stable/unstable?
What benefits would we get from a Xeon III system over a II or could
we simply project expected performance improvments based on a cheaper II
system?
Is a Xeon quad unit a sensible choice for a testbed of our software -
numerically intensive medical image analsis?
Many thanks for any help.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Fabrice Bazetoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disable an adress with netscape
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:37:58 +0100
First, thank you for helping me
> What kind of addresses? Like doubleclick or flycast.com or something
> like that?
I want to disable the access for some internet adresses like
www.caramail.com, i have tried with ipchains but there is a proxy and all of
the traffic is for all, disable some ip addresses don't work so !
> If your talking about the pesky popup windows you need to disable java
> script.
>
> edit/preferences/advanced/enable javascript
The problem is in reality to prevent students from doing chat (there is
always a popup), but if they can doing this modification, it's a big
problem...
Do you know some tools that can make this ??
------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disable an adress with netscape
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:54:01 GMT
Fabrice Bazetoux wrote:
>
> First, thank you for helping me
>
> > What kind of addresses? Like doubleclick or flycast.com or something
> > like that?
>
> I want to disable the access for some internet adresses like
> www.caramail.com, i have tried with ipchains but there is a proxy and all of
> the traffic is for all, disable some ip addresses don't work so !
>
> > If your talking about the pesky popup windows you need to disable java
> > script.
> >
> > edit/preferences/advanced/enable javascript
>
> The problem is in reality to prevent students from doing chat (there is
> always a popup), but if they can doing this modification, it's a big
> problem...
> Do you know some tools that can make this ??
I think this will block their whole IP range. Depending what you are
wanting to do you can change the REJECT to DENY if you want.
ipchains -A input -j REJECT -i $EXTDEV -p tcp \
-s $ANYWHERE -d 195.0.0.0/8 -l
--
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
Completed more W/U's than 99.015% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
------------------------------
From: Kevin Davis� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Delaying eth0 initialization?
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 11:01:58 GMT
I'm not sure I follow. Our broadband cable access requires no domain
specified, no DNS specified on the client end. Are these just
"placeholders"? I was not able just to stick anything in the Alias or
Linux would complain when booting. Isn't IP address and Net mask
irrelevant if DHCP is being used?
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 23:55:57 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bit Twister) wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 03:15:39 GMT, Mike Loiterman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Sorry about that...RedHat 7
>
>What has rh 7.0 done that root cannot see /var/log/messages, do a
>ls -al /var/log/messages to see who the owner is.
>
>
>Here is a snippet I send to cable users.
>
>linuxconf
> Config
> Networking
> Client tasks
> Basic host information cxxxx-x if + then cxxxx-x.city.state.home.com
> Adapter set Enabled
> Config mode <> Manual <>Dhcp
> Node_domain cxxxx-x.city.state.home.com
> ALias cxxxx-x
> IP Address nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn
> Mask 255.255.255.0
> Network Device eth0 (cable to modem)
> Accept
> Named Servers
> DNS usage [] DNS is required for normal usage
> Default domain city.state.home.com -----.
> ip of name server 1 nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn |
> ip of name server 2 nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn |
> Search domain 1 Default_domain_here <----'
> Search domain 2 city.state.home.com
> Accept
> Routing and gateways
> Set
> Default gateway nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn
> Enable routing []
> Accept
> Configure
> [] Does not export any routes
> Accept
> Quit
> Hostname search path
> [] Multiple ips for one host
> <> host, dns
> Accept
> Misc
> Information about other hosts
> (here you add info about other pc in the house)
>
> Ok, Save. Activate changes and exit.
>
>The Activate brought your network on line and connected
>you to the internet if you are lucky.
>/var/log/messages contains errors if any.
=======================================
What could possibly go wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the z's from my address)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
