Linux-Setup Digest #722, Volume #20 Wed, 28 Feb 01 02:13:10 EST
Contents:
Re: Sound on Debian2.2r2 w/Ximian (Donald K Knepshield)
Re: Mandrake 7.0 "cannot find screen" help!!! ("raiderob")
Re: ssh on Debian, not connecting to OpenBSD 2.7 ["Disconnecting: Bad packet length
1349676916"] (Richard E. Silverman)
Re: Booting Raid 1 or 5 ("Leo")
Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR? (Mike Perry)
graphics messed up on recompiled kernel (RH7, 2.2-16) (Jeremy Schneider)
Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR? (Jeremy Schneider)
Re: ntfs and linux-2.4.0 (James Rose)
Kernel 2.4.2 and 'all blowed up' on e2fsck check of /dev/hda1 ("Rake@Q3")
Re: Netscape6 crashes like crazy under RH7 ("H.A.J. van Niekerk")
Q: How to change default font ? (Swapnajit Mittra)
Re: Partition mount points for Redhat Linux install (Gilbert Gulston)
Re: Re: What do you folks 'make' of this: ipchains in kernel 2.2.7-14 RH7 (David
Cecere)
Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR? (David Cecere)
Re: Netscape6 crashes like crazy under RH7 (David Cecere)
Re: gqview: Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald K Knepshield)
Subject: Re: Sound on Debian2.2r2 w/Ximian
Date: 28 Feb 2001 03:12:52 GMT
H.Bruijn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: On 24 Feb 2001 00:47:41 GMT, Donald K Knepshield allegedly wrote:
: > Hey all. I have just recently switched to Debian2.2r2 and upgraded
: >to the latest Ximian Gnome desktop (along with Red-Carpet). The problem
: >I am having is that I can play sounds with XMMS and play CD's when logged
: >in as a normal user, but can't get any desktop sounds. When I try to use
: >mixer programs such as gmix, aumix, etc. I get an error message reading
: >that no mixers are present, make sure that sound is compiled into the
: >kernel. If I log in and use X as root (not that I would normally do
: >this) I don't have this problem, can run the mixer programs and play
: >desktop sounds (such as events for windows). I am assuming it is a
: >permission problem, but I don't really know where to look. Any help
: >would be greatly appreciated.
:
: Are you a member of group audio?
: Permissions should be :
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 14, 4 Jan 4 2000 /dev/audio*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 14, 3 Jan 4 2000 /dev/dsp*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 35, 0 Jan 4 2000 /dev/midi*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 14, 0 Jan 4 2000 /dev/mixer*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 35, 64 Jan 4 2000 /dev/rmidi*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 14, 1 Jan 4 2000 /dev/sequencer
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 35, 128 Jan 4 2000 /dev/smtpe*
: crw-rw---- 1 root audio 14, 6 Jan 4 2000 /dev/sndstat
I added myself to the audio group and checked the permissions,
but this did not seem to change the problem with playing sounds.
I can still use XMMS to play CD's, but can't use the mixers or
have the sounds for windows events. Any other ideas what I
could be overlooking?
Thanks again.
Kevin Knepshield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "raiderob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,comp.os.linux.help,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Mandrake 7.0 "cannot find screen" help!!!
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:41:12 GMT
don't use a generic monitor, use a NEC Multisync 4fge
"DOKool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> DrakX installation always goes well up to this point... then i have to
> pick out a monitor. Every combination of one of the generic monitor
> types w/ the ATI All In Wonder card ends up w/ DrakX not finding the
> damn screen. anyone else have this problem?
>
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh,comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc
Subject: Re: ssh on Debian, not connecting to OpenBSD 2.7 ["Disconnecting: Bad packet
length 1349676916"]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard E. Silverman)
Date: 27 Feb 2001 23:15:53 -0500
>>>>> "James" == J Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> In comp.os.linux.setup Richard E. Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
James> wrote:
>> > Disconnecting: Bad packet length 1349676916
James> --------------------------------^
>> 1349676916 decimal = 50726F74 hex = "Prot" ASCII
>> Looks suspiciously like some sort of text message, perhaps
>> beginning "Protocol" or "Protection"? What do the syslog messages
>> on the server say? How about if you try the connection with the
>> server in debug mode?
>> -- Richard Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James> I think it disconected because if assumes a 1.3GB packet is
James> some sort of attack.
It disconnected because the maximum packet size OpenSSH will accept is
2^18 = 262144 bytes. That is the explicit maximum in SSH-1. SSH-2
requires that implementations accept packets at least 35000 bytes long, so
that value works for SSH-2 as well.
James> To answer the original poster's question, make shure both are
James> using the same version of SSH. (apparently the 2.0 protocol
James> isn't completely backwards compatible)
SSH-2 is explicitly *not* backwards compatible with SSH-1 -- but this is
not the problem. Both versions of the protocol begin with each side
transmitting a version string. If there's a mismatch, one side will
end the session with a sensible error message, before even switching to
the packet protocol. The symptoms here mean that both sides thought there
was a common protocol version supported, and got some way into the
conversation when one side got a corrupt packet.
The reason I wrote the bit about 1349676916 = "Prot", is that it is not
uncommon for some software problem to cause one side to emit a text
message into the middle of the SSH protocol stream (this is especially
easy to get if you're starting sshd from inetd). If this happens on a
packet boundary, then one side interprets the first four bytes of the text
as the packet size, which is usually out of bounds. So decoding the
reported bogus packet size in this way is useful to get a clue as to
what's going on.
--
Richard Silverman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Leo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Booting Raid 1 or 5
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 04:31:53 GMT
Julius,
1) If you are using RAID5, then you can lose ONE drive (if no hot spare is
configured) and continue to operate with full functionality, meaning no data
loss and maintaining the ability to boot. You better plan an outage ASAP
however to get the new drive in place if no hot-plug (or, if you are using a
hardware array controller that supports hot plug devices like ICP Vortex
Array Controllers you won't even need to schedule an outage). The parity
areas on the remaining RAID5 devices will rebuild the data on the newly
replaced drive.
2) If you are using a hardware mirror (RAID1) configuration, then yes-- you
should not experience any data loss or ability to boot at all. With
software/host based RAID1 be careful to make sure it's a true full mirror
including all the boot partition stuff and that the controller is pointing
to the correct device you which to boot from (the non-failed drive).
3) Rebuilds. Again, with ICP (and others I would hope) yes you should still
be able to boot. If you reboot the server it will come up and continue the
rebuild process on the new device until complete. ICP is intelligent enough
to do this as a background task giving server I/O priority in a rebuild
situation to reduce any degradation during a drive rebuild.
I hope this helps. We deploy lots of servers and would always recommend
leveraging hardware RAID (sounds like you are based on your questions).
Also, use a high quality controller that has some decent processing
capabilities (we use ICP after testing many others in the past including
Mylex and Adaptec. We were so pleased with our own deployments over the
years we are now a primary distributor of ICP products. The products have
been totally solid, and the support is great too). Always leverage hardware
RAID when possible over software/host based solutions. Not only is it more
reliable, but you don't burden the OS or the CPU with processing I/O giving
you some substantial performance gains as well. You want your CPU
processing application data, not being interrupted by I/O and data
protection-- that's where a good array controller comes in.
Sincerely,
Leo J. Squire
www.icp-order.com
High Availability, Now Highly Available
"julius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:iDVm6.160$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Hi,
>
> On a system with hardware RAID level 5, booting Linux on RAID devices, if
> one drive fails, does the system boot, before replacing the drive? (not
> hotswap)
>
> And if instead of RAID level 5 we have a level 1 (mirroring)? Does the
> system boot if one drive fails, before replacing the drive?
>
>
> Does the rebuild, after replacing a drive, allows booting the system w/o
> problems? In both levels?
>
>
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Perry)
Subject: Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 04:44:29 -0000
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:45:09 +0800, Dino Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I installed Linux Red Hat 7.0 on a multi-boot PC (Bootstar). Normally
>the multi-boot program takes the MBR (Master Boot Record) and fills
>the partition table with respective partition information of the
>profile chosen by the user.
>
>However, when Linux Red Hat 7.0 is installed, it takes control of the
>MBR, so I have to re-install Bootstar, the multi-boot program. But
>after this, Linux cannot be started any more, with the following
>message:
>Error while loading operating system! <Key>
>
>My question is: how to prevent Linux from taking MBR?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Regards,
>Dino
When you do Linux installs you get some options of where to load the boot
loader. Sometimes it defaults to MBR; but other times you can select things
like placement on floppy or on the root partition of the boot drive. If you
choose a floppy, thats where it goes. Then you need a boot floppy. If you
choose the root partition, it will not get in the mbr at all. You may not
get this step if you the "whizbang, automated" install with Redhat. I don't
do redhat so am not sure. SuSE and debian offer choices though.
--
Michael Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==================
------------------------------
From: Jeremy Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: graphics messed up on recompiled kernel (RH7, 2.2-16)
Date: 28 Feb 2001 05:00:48 GMT
Hello, hope someone can point me in the right direction....
When I install Redhat 7 on my system and use the kernel that is
automatically installed, things are displayed just fine. However, when
I recompile the kernel and run with the new kernel, the display is
slightly (but very annoyingly) messed up: The icons at the bottom are
displayed as garbage; The "embossed" RedHat logo seems to be smeared
across the screen; windows with any graphics in them come up as mostly
garbage.
I'm not aware of changing any parts of the kernel configuration that I
would think would change the display characteristics.
If I take a window such as a terminal emulator and slowly wipe it across
the incorrectly displayed portion of the screen, then when I expose the
previously incorrectly portion of the screen, it gets displayed
correctly.
I don't really know where to start to diagnose and fix this problem.
Things I have UNsuccessfully tried: (1) I ran xf86config. The
configuration file it created was not significantly different from the
one I had been using. (2) I recompiled the kernel for a 386. (3) I
changed my BIOS settings to be more conservative.
Since the stock kernel "works" and my recompiled one doesn't, one thing
that might be useful would be to know exactly what configuration was
used by RedHat to compile the kernel provided on the CD. Can anyone
point me to the configuration file(s) that was/were used to compile the
kernel?
Hardware system config:
Motherboard: ABIT KT7-Raid
CPU: Athlon 1000 MHz,
Graphics Card: Hercules (Guillemot) GE Force GTS Pro 64 MB
Monitor: Viewsonic E790
RedHat 7.0.
Thanks very much, for any help you can provide!
------------------------------
From: Jeremy Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR?
Date: 28 Feb 2001 05:19:37 GMT
When you install, do not choose to install LILO. That's the program
that overwrites the MBR. If you do that, though, you will not be able
to boot directly into Linux. You'll have to do one of the following:
1. Boot into (Windows and restart into DOS mode) or DOs and use loadlin
to start Linux.
2. Boot from a floppy.
Good luck.
Dino Hsu wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I installed Linux Red Hat 7.0 on a multi-boot PC (Bootstar). Normally
> the multi-boot program takes the MBR (Master Boot Record) and fills
> the partition table with respective partition information of the
> profile chosen by the user.
>
> However, when Linux Red Hat 7.0 is installed, it takes control of the
> MBR, so I have to re-install Bootstar, the multi-boot program. But
> after this, Linux cannot be started any more, with the following
> message:
> Error while loading operating system! <Key>
>
> My question is: how to prevent Linux from taking MBR?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Dino
------------------------------
From: rosejm "go spam yourself" @rose-hulman.edu (James Rose)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: ntfs and linux-2.4.0
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:05:32 GMT
Have you tried to do this as root? I know that there can be problems accessing
the mount point if you are not root. The premissions are screwed up and you
can't change them (read-only)
>After compiling and installing the kernel-2.4.0 it's impossible to list
>the files on an ntfs(win2k) filesystem. The ntfs module is compiled in
>the kernel, it mounts the partition without any errors, but when I go to
>the mount-point and do an "ls", there is not list of the files in that
>directory. What am I missing? Under 2.2.17, it workd fine without a
>problem.
>
>mount command: mount -t ntfs /dev/sda1 /win2k -o ro
>under: Linux mandrake 7.2
>kernel-2.4.0 + upgraded modutils, binutils,... etc.
>
>Thanks for your help
>--
>Serge.
------------------------------
From: "Rake@Q3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel 2.4.2 and 'all blowed up' on e2fsck check of /dev/hda1
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:10:00 GMT
Hi All,
I've tried to read every damn manual there is, however, I'm stumped.
I've a perfectly working Mandrake 7.2 install which I access via Loadlin
from Windows 98 with kernel 2.1.xx (I believe).
Well, I downloaded the kernel source for 2.4.2, done the normal untarring
and moving to /usr/src/linux-2.4.2 and made the link from that to
/usr/src/linux.
I installed all the upgrades needed per the /Documentations/changes list.
The kernel compiles fine, as far as I can tell. I do the normal 'make dep'
'make bzImage' 'make modules' 'make modules_install' and for grins, 'make
install'.
My normal boot up from loadlin works like this:
c:\loadlin.exe c:\vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1 ro hdd=ide-scsi ide1=autotune
ide0=autotune vga=785
which works fine. After the build, I cp'd the new bzImage onto the my
windows 'c' drive as vmlinuz1.
Now I've modified the loadlin to this:
c:\loadlin.exe c:\vmlinuz1 root=/dev/hda1 ro hdd=ide-scsi ide1=autotune
ide0=autotune vga=785
And the system starts to load as usual, however the messages flying across
the screen of course have some different messages than the old kernel, but
this is what happens:
I get almost normal hard drive detection, as in the /dev/hda..etc., but
after system starts to initialize and 'mount' the harddrives for fsck check,
I get this stuff:
E2fsck 1.19....etc...Superblock could not be read or doesn't describe a
correct ext2 FS ..../dev/hda/
Then the system goes into the 'file system repair' mode, and I'm stuck.
I know the hardware and /dev/hda are 'fine', because I can reboot, and load
up the Mandrake 7.2 kernel fine. At the particular point at the 'file
system repair' mode prompt, I am unable to mount /dev/hda.....(aint that
strange).
So, I 'shift-PageUp' and look at the kernel initialization with the hard
drive detection and I see something out of the ordinary that I've not seen
before, and definately don't see when I boot 7.2:
Partition Check:
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/P1 P2 <P5 P6.....P11>
So, I try fdisk /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/P1 and it actually works.
But that gets me nowhere, because I just want to figure out how to tell the
kernel to mount /dev/hda1, like my old kernel used to do. Any help you all
can give, I would appreciate. Just so you know, I've recompiled the kernal
about 15 to 20 times, trying to find out if I've got something 'set' wrong.
So, right now I've got the kernel stripped to the bare essentials, but
nothing seems to work.
TIA,
Dylan sends
------------------------------
From: "H.A.J. van Niekerk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape6 crashes like crazy under RH7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:54:34 +0100
Don't use Netscape 6: it's far from stable. No matter the Linux-version
and distributiion you use. Besides, some features just don't work good
enough.
Huub
Paul Folbrecht wrote:
> Anyone else have this problem? Maybe it's due to those buggy unpatched
> glibc libs. That's what I'm hoping anyway.
------------------------------
From: Swapnajit Mittra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Q: How to change default font ?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:58:49 -0500
This is really an X question. The default font for all
X applications that do not have any app-defaults/* file
is unreadable in my reloaded RH6.1 running gnome. Any
character just appears as a black square.
I have changed the font for one application and everything
looks OK in that application.
Can somebody point out how to change the default font
for any X application ? I think I did this before, but
can not seem to remember. (BTW, using Xt option -fn
did not work).
Thanks in advance.
- Swapnajit
------------------------------
From: Gilbert Gulston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Partition mount points for Redhat Linux install
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:30:12 -0000
Thanks for the advice Rasmus, all I needed to know was which
subdirectories were major space users in /usr. Got the packages to
install and as you suggested the error messages disappeared. I've got a
lot to learn - but now that the system is up - the fun begins.
Million thanks.
Gil.
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Gilbert Gulston wrote:
>
> > I'm a beginner trying to make my first install of Linux to two old
500MG
> > IDE drives. I made one of the drives a single primary partition to
> > mount /usr. I hoped that partition would hold all of the packages I
wanted
> > to install, but the install actually needed an additional 130MG.
> > I have an empty logical partition on the second drive that I tried to
> > mount as /usr through Disk Druid during the install process. Disk Druid
> > does not allow you to edit two mount points as /usr, so I tried
mounting
> > the extra empty 160MG on the second drive as /usr/local. I learned,
> > however, that a custom Linux 7.0 does not install to /usr/local
> > automatically. Is there any way to install the additional packages to
that
> > empty logical partition on an initial install - or will I have to
install
> > a minimal package, then try to get the rest in later?
>
> You could make /usr a raid partition - but IIRC RedHat 7 does not allow
> raid for /usr...
>
> Also you could make a partition forone of the subdirs in /usr - for
> example src, X11R6, bin or so.
>
> Or you could just make a tighter installation.
>
> > I would also appreciate any advice on the following bug/error message
that
> > shut down the install:
>
> > OSError: [Errno 28] no space left on device
>
> It just means, that you have run out of disk space.
>
> Rasmus
>
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: David Cecere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: What do you folks 'make' of this: ipchains in kernel 2.2.7-14 RH7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:56:44 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:31:06 GMT, "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
}On Feb 23, 2001 at 11:11, David Cecere eloquently wrote:
}
}>Greetings,
}>
}>RH tech support refused to address this as a post-install issue. I was
}>trying to recompile my kernel to support ipchains and this is what make
}>tells me:
}Are you sure the kernel RH7 came with did not have ipchains
}built as a module.
My RH7 kernel (2.2.16-22) had ipchains compiled into the kernel. I've since
built a customized 2.2.17-14 kernel. I'm wondering if xconfig has a
problem. I can't get any of the masquerading options to go active--they
stay grayed-out no matter which kernel options I choose.
}>
}>make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/net/ipv4' kgcc
}>-D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
}>-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-strength-reduce
-m486
}>-malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=686
}>-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c ip_masq.c ip_masq.c:578: `ip_masq_hash' undeclared
here
}>(not in a function) ip_masq.c:578: initializer element for
}>`__ksymtab_ip_masq_hash.value' is not constant ip_masq.c:579:
}>`ip_masq_unhash' undeclared here (not in a function) ip_masq.c:579:
}>initializer element for `__ksymtab_ip_masq_unhash.value' is not constant
}>ip_masq.c:518: warning: `masq_port_lock' defined but not used make[3]:
***
}>[ip_masq.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory
}>`/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/net/ipv4' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]:
}>Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/net/ipv4' make[1]: ***
}>[_subdir_ipv4] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory
}>`/usr/src/linux-2.2.17/net' make: *** [_dir_net] Error 2
}The lines that read 'undeclared here' should give a clue.
}Seems you have not configured your kernel right. Reconfigure
}using make menuconfig and read the help in it.
_____________________________________________________________________________
"Thinking is, or ought to be, a coolness and a calmness; and our poor hearts
throb, and our poor brains beat too much for that."--Herman Melville
My r�sum� and etc.: http://4.34.161.50/
My patent: http://4.34.161.50/widget/
------------------------------
From: David Cecere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to Prevent Linux from Taking MBR?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:18:03 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The RH 7 install script gives you the option of installing LILO--which you
need to do in order to have a multiboot system--on either the MBR or the
first sector of the boot drive (or something similar). You want to choose
the latter option.
David
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 23:45:09 +0800, Dino Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
}Dear all,
}
}I installed Linux Red Hat 7.0 on a multi-boot PC (Bootstar). Normally
}the multi-boot program takes the MBR (Master Boot Record) and fills
}the partition table with respective partition information of the
}profile chosen by the user.
}
}However, when Linux Red Hat 7.0 is installed, it takes control of the
}MBR, so I have to re-install Bootstar, the multi-boot program. But
}after this, Linux cannot be started any more, with the following
}message:
}Error while loading operating system! <Key>
}
}My question is: how to prevent Linux from taking MBR?
}
}Thanks in advance.
}
}Regards,
}Dino
_____________________________________________________________________________
"Thinking is, or ought to be, a coolness and a calmness; and our poor hearts
throb, and our poor brains beat too much for that."--Herman Melville
My r�sum� and etc.: http://4.34.161.50/
My patent: http://4.34.161.50/widget/
------------------------------
From: David Cecere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape6 crashes like crazy under RH7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:19:39 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netscape 6 is a travesty--it doesn't even support socks 4. I don't know why
it was even released in such a dysfunctional state. I ended up nuking it
and going back to 4.76.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:45:43 GMT, "Paul Folbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
}Anyone else have this problem? Maybe it's due to those buggy unpatched
}glibc libs. That's what I'm hoping anyway.
}
}
_____________________________________________________________________________
"Thinking is, or ought to be, a coolness and a calmness; and our poor hearts
throb, and our poor brains beat too much for that."--Herman Melville
My r�sum� and etc.: http://4.34.161.50/
My patent: http://4.34.161.50/widget/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gqview: Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display:
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:58:38 -0800
Pavan wrote:
>
> There is a image viewer zgv which works
> beautifully & has *lot* of options. It uses
> svgalib. Even though my card is not supported by
> svgalib, I specified in /etc/vga/libvga.config the
> chipset as VESA. And it gives me 1024x768@32bit
> (max supported by my monitor).
>
> -Pavan
I tried it and it works great. Thanks!!!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
