Linux-Setup Digest #976, Volume #20 Tue, 3 Apr 01 10:13:08 EDT
Contents:
Re: Help! System freeze or normal processing time? ("Eric")
Re: ADSL - Connect to BTopenworld BUSINESS service ethernet router. ("Colin
Griffiths")
Re: Anybody tried various 2.4 kernel based distributions? Opinions? (David Efflandt)
Re: buiding router and firewall with SUSE 7.1 (David Efflandt)
Re: Help: rh7 + WinMe problem (Ton 't Lam)
Re: External CD-Writer (David Efflandt)
Re: Can't get Sound Blaster Live! Value to work, but it seems to be loaded ("Vigil")
Re: mt command fails (Manoj Patil)
How do you set hostname in linux box that gets ip via DHCP? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: mt command fails (Manoj Patil)
Re: uninstall x-windows ("Chris Coyle")
Re: Partioning problem during install ("Carl Wick")
Re: Howto connect Win2k to Samba ? ("Neil")
Re: Please, help me, I'm going nuts (Henrik Farre)
Re: backspace key in exceed? (Donald)
Re: Can't print (drivers?) ("Laszlo G. Szijarto")
Squid&RH 7.0 ("Theng Ung")
Sharing with Sco Opendesktop ("Martin Collins")
Re: Squid&RH 7.0 ("KW")
Re: Swap: how big? (Nick Condon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! System freeze or normal processing time?
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:56:26 +0200
> Install retried - System freeze at "Performing Configuration" did not
allow
> the use of the <ctr><alt> 1 to 7.
> When pressed, nothing happened.
but if you try this earlier, it does work, right?
> Tried manual partitioning, 100 MB root, 64 MB Swap, rest for /usr (over
1g)
> No change
>
> Tried Custom install, several times, with different packages.
> No change
>
> How do I get out of the freeze without manually turning the computer off?
I don't know.
You could try a text install.
If that freezes too, I don't know what else to try.
Eric
------------------------------
From: "Colin Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ADSL - Connect to BTopenworld BUSINESS service ethernet router.
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:02:51 +0100
Thanks man that's brill. One other question though would you bother to
setup a cacheing DNS server to save on bandwidth?
Regards
Colin.
urban junkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:QW6y6.15763$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> "colin griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message news:2p6y6.15833$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Thanks for your reply, sorry to confuse the issue but what I was after
is
> > something along these lines. When you set up the router with a windows
> > machine tcp settings are roughly - dynamic ip, no wins, no dns server,
and
> > no gateway. You then check that you can ping the outside world.
Continue
> > by running a browser and connect to 192.168.254.254 which is the router
> > gateway. The user is then prompted to enter a username and password.
> > After connection you can browse the web.
> >
> > If I leave the router turned on and connect it to eth1, in my Linux
server
> > which is setup to use dhcp and reboot, the server can ping the outside
> > world, eth0 is setup to access my internal lan. However I would assume
> that
> > if the router is powered off then I would need to re-logon after
powering
> > up. I could perhaps use netscape from x-windows or is there a text
based
> > browser included with Rehat 7.0?
> >
> > What I am asking is has anyone documented the correct procedure to
> configure
> > a Linux machine and the BT router. Starting from the basic steps of
> > configuring the nic's , DNS cacheing etc. Hence the post to a Linux
> > newsgroup, it's the Linux setup I'm after.
> >
> > I have discovered the above by trial and error I would prefer to follow
> more
> > precise steps.
> >
> > Again thanks for your patience.
> >
>
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> I've got an ethernet ADSL setup (I'm running through easynet, but it's all
> pretty much the same kit).
>
> You shouldn't need to login to the router after the initial setup is
done -
> it has your login info stored and uses it to connect into the BT cloud -
> I've just off and on'ed my router, and that seems right.
>
> Now, you've established that your router is acting as a DHCP server (ie
> issuing IP addresses) because when you used a Windows PC, you set it up
for
> dynamic IP (ie getting its info from the DHCP server - the router).
>
> So, for Linux, the easiest way would seem to be to run linuxconf, and set
> eth1 to be enabled and use DHCP - all the necessary settings for DNS etc
> should then come from the DHCP server. So, do this, and this should get it
> all working.
>
> You can then verify the settings you've been given by running "pump -s",
> which gives a listing of all settings that have been assigned.
>
> PS - lynx is the default text web browser, and I think it's installed as
> standard - otherwise easy to install off the RH cd's.
>
>
> Again, HTH, and if you have questions, or if I've misunderstood, post here
!
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Anybody tried various 2.4 kernel based distributions? Opinions?
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:17:48 -0400, Alan Claunch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Warren Postma wrote:
>
>> I installed Traktopels (Mandrake 8.0 beta 2). Way too unstable. The
>> Installer kept crashing and there were lots of error messages from the
>> newly upgrade RPM 4.0 package manager, and the KDE and GNOME installation
>> failed, leaving me in a Circa-1983 version of X, with an xterm, and
>> xclock, and nothing else. Nice.
>>
>> I'm going to have a spin around the block with the new RedHat "Wolverine"
>> beta, which apparently supercedes the previous "Fisher" beta, If I've
>> understood the dates/times on the ISO files correctly. <grin>
>>
>> Also, it appears that SuSE has a 2.4 based distribution out there, but
>> there's NO way to evaluate it without first buying it. If I tried it, and
>> it was stable, I would certainly pay $29 or $49 or whatever, but I'm not
>> going to Buy Before Try, how bass-ackwards is that, in the Open Source
>> world.
>>
>> Any other opinions? Is there a Debian or Slackware beta in the works with
>> 2.4 kernel support built in?
>>
>> Warren Postma
>> London Ontario Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I am currently using SuSE 7.1 (upgraded from 7.0) with KDE 2.1.1 (upgraded
>from 2.0) and kernel 2.4.0. It works wonderfully right out of the box and
>is easy to configure. The distribution seems stable and there is lots of
>SuSE documentation both hard copy and on line.
> Good Luck
> Alan Claunch
I'll second that motion. I installed it on 3 boxes using kernel 2.4.0.
The only kernel 2.4.0 glitch is that the new tulip module (like recent
2.2.x kernels) eventually hangs my FA310TX and 2.4.0 does not have
old_tulip, so I will run the included 2.2.18 with old_tulip on that box.
Everything else seems to work fine including CD writing.
Just be aware that the 3 CD workstation version is missing some things
like ncftp, slrn, bind, and has no ftpd of any kind. It just has tin and
netscape for news reading. But I downloaded pro-ftpd and can get the rest
from the net. I imagine the bigger version has everything (7 CD's +
DVD-ROM).
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: buiding router and firewall with SUSE 7.1
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:46:34 GMT, Jon Levesque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've installed a base system of SUSE 7.1 with two nics. eth0 and eth1. I
>have Ip_forwarding enabled but routing does not seem to be working. My
>routing table is below.
>
>Protected servers sit on eth1, T1 on eth0. On the suse box I can ping any
>machine on eth1 and any site on eth0. But from machines on the eth1 side I
>cannot ping across the suse box. eth1 has ip 204.83.38.4 and eth0 has ip
>204.83.38.3 and gateway is 204.83.38.1. clients have ip 204.83.38.4 as their
>gateway and can ping it successfully, but as I said not across.
>
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric REF UseIface
>
>204.83.38.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 uh 0 0 eth0
>
>204.83.38.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 u 0 0 eth1
>
>0.0.0.0 204.83.38.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
If that is 0 instead of 1, ip forward is not enabled. Check the
IP_FORWARD setting in /etc/rc.config. Then run SuSEconfig.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: Ton 't Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: rh7 + WinMe problem
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 09:24:13 +0200
Make sure to use the latest PM that supports MS-ME. That will work.
UVA Math Department wrote:
> Are there any known problems for coexistence of linux and Windows Me? I
> tried to install rh7 (it works just fine), but no matter what I did,
> windows crushes all the time while loading.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: External CD-Writer
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2 Apr 2001 13:40:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Heimo wrote:
>> Please, how can I get my external USB CD-Writer to run.
>
>You need to setup the USB support before all (kernel 2.4.x), add
>also the USB Storage support.
>See the documentation under /usr/src/linux/Documentation/usb
You also need scsi support (scsi_mod), scsi generic support (sg for sg#
devices for cd write), and scsi cdrom support (sr_mod for scd# devices to
mount as cdrom). Any or all can be modules.
Also see http://www.linux-usb.org/ and the "Working devices list" link
from there. It almost got my USB CD-RW working, I can read it as cdrom,
but not write to it yet. Also see /usr/share/doc/packages/usbmgr. I had
to add my device to /etc/usbmgr/usbmgr.conf listing its vendor and
product id along with: module scsi_mod, sg, sr_mod, usb-storage
I believe there is some Kodak camera support. But I use CF or SmartMedia
pc card adapters on my laptop for that (faster and simpler).
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: "Vigil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't get Sound Blaster Live! Value to work, but it seems to be loaded
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 12:36:05 +0000
Why not finally go and get a 2.4 kernel that has sblive support in it?
"Unknown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> had the audacity to claim:
> I finally went and got the
> 2.2.19 kernel and compiled that and included support for the SB
> emu10k1 in it.
--
.
------------------------------
From: Manoj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mt command fails
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 17:57:42 +0530
Yes,
Infact when I connect this same drive to AIX, the block size shown is
1024 and I can change it to 512 or anything using the aix tctl command.
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 17:12:03 +0530, Manoj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi
> >I have two tapes
> >1. Exabyte 8200
> >2. Exabyte 8505
> >(Both are 8MM devices)
> >
> >For the first tape, mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk 1024 fails
> >However I am able to change the block size for the second tape.
> >Both drives have tape cartridges in it
> >
> >Can some one suggest why mt fails on the first tape ?
> >
> Are 1K blocks supported by the 8200?
>
> --
> gregorie | Martin Gregorie
> @logica | Logica Ltd
> com | +44 020 76379111
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How do you set hostname in linux box that gets ip via DHCP?
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 12:31:11 GMT
I have a linux box on a small network in my house with several other
win2k boxes and a Maxgate 3200 cable sharing gateway. This gateway
connects my ethernet network to the internet through a cable modem and
acts as a DHCP server. If I look at its leased ip address table, it
correctly shows the computers on my network with their DHCP assigned
ip addresses (192.168.0.XXX) and their names. And, the win2k boxes
seem to know both their own names and the names of other win2k boxes
on the network. These machines can be pinged, etc., via their ip
address or their name. The linux box, however, is unknown to the other
computers on the network, except by ip address. And, the win2k boxes
are not known to the linux box, except by ip address. Also, whenever
the linux box starts up, sendmail hangs because it does not think the
hostname is set correctly. Also, whenever I do stuff with linuxconfig,
I get errors relating to httpd and unknown host name, or incorrect
host name. I realize that you are supposed to set the host hame and
its ip address in /etd/hosts, but I don't see how I can do this in s
machine that could have a different ip address each time it boots up,
due to DHCP. Also, I do not have a fully qualified domain name, since
I just have a home network. I do use a workgroup name, but that is
all. So, again, how do you properly handle this situation in Linux,
since all of the documentation and faqs that I can find say to use a
fully qualified name, including the domain name?
TIA,
Ed
------------------------------
From: Manoj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mt command fails
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 17:59:12 +0530
Yes,
Infact when I connect this same drive to AIX, the block size shown is
1024 and I can change it to 512 or anything using the aix tctl command.
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 17:12:03 +0530, Manoj Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi
> >I have two tapes
> >1. Exabyte 8200
> >2. Exabyte 8505
> >(Both are 8MM devices)
> >
> >For the first tape, mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk 1024 fails
> >However I am able to change the block size for the second tape.
> >Both drives have tape cartridges in it
> >
> >Can some one suggest why mt fails on the first tape ?
> >
> Are 1K blocks supported by the 8200?
>
> --
> gregorie | Martin Gregorie
> @logica | Logica Ltd
> com | +44 020 76379111
------------------------------
From: "Chris Coyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: uninstall x-windows
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:40:58 -0400
"maher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
>
> I would to uninstall my x-windows.What is the packages name for
> x-windows.Currently I'm running Redhat Linux.
>
> thank you very much,
>
> maher
Maher,
there may be more than 1 package involved. Do this:
rpm -qa | grep XFree86
This should give you a list of package names.
However, I don't know which ones you can safely remove.
(Anybody else know?)
That may also depend on how your system is configured.
When it comes to removing packages you have to be very careful.
------------------------------
From: "Carl Wick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Partioning problem during install
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 07:59:53 -0400
Will give that a try.
Question, when I boot up the RH7 install disk and select rescue it didn't
let me fdisk /dev/hdb. Said the device wasn't there, do you think it will
let me do your dd comands? I am not at that machine or I would try it know.
Thanks for the help.
"Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9abq6q$l92$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > No....still can't create /. But I had at one time...long story but I
> > think creating and removing the Linux partitions on this disk has
> > fouled it up somehow.
> >
>
> The you can try to clear the MBR entirely.
> (You need a linux for this, use the rescue option
> of the RH CD if you don't have a linux installed yet)
>
> First backup the current MBR:
> dd if=/dev/hdb of=./old_MBR_hdb count=1
>
> And then wipe it clean:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb count=1
>
> Try the install again now.
>
> Eric
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.windows-w2k,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,microsoft.public.windowsnt,nl.comp.os.ms-windows
Subject: Re: Howto connect Win2k to Samba ?
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:54:19 +0100
"Dean Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Craig Kelley wrote:
> > "tu|sa" <tu|[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Windows networking won't allow you to login to the same server as
> > different users.
> >
> > Stupid? Yes.
>
> The correction to the above statement is that Win95/98 will not allow you
to
> connect to the system as a different user. Windows NT/2000/XP all provide
the
> ability to connect to remote systems as different users from the one that
is
> logged in (just that you can't have two connections to the same server
with
> different identitys).
>
> See ya
Which is true from a pure sense (client side implementation / restriction),
it is, however, possible to connect to a server with a different identity
using different / differing credentials by supplying the IP address of the
target server in the net use...
net use \\<IP Address>\<shared resource>
/user:<domain>\<username>|<username>@<FQDN> *
It does bear note that this is a client / netbios / SMB type redirector
thing, and that Kerberos under W2K has additional mechanisms and
functionality that aren't restricted in quite the same manner.
Not sure about all the cross-posting, seems rather gratuituous, but not
knowing where this is being read from I'll maintain them as is, but set
follow-ups accordingly - as some of them seem decidedly tenuous.
Cheers
Neil
------------------------------
From: Henrik Farre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat,redhat.config,redhat.general
Subject: Re: Please, help me, I'm going nuts
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 15:27:56 +0200
Yello
James Hamlin wrote:
> I did however get it installed using the text based installation and then I
> found that I needed to add the noaccel and sw_cursor options to
> /etc/X11/XF86Config as below, after running Xconfigurator:-
I fund a RH7.0 iso on the net, which did not have the glitch, so now it
works :)
> Hope this helps
Well u gave it a shoot.
--
Mvh. / Kind regards
Henrik Farre
Webpage: http://Welcome.to/Webbench
------------------------------
From: Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: backspace key in exceed?
Date: 3 Apr 2001 09:25:12 -0400
Trebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Donald,
: Changing the 'shifted' mapping to be identical to the 'non-shifted' mapping
: resolved the issue!
: THANKS!
: -Bob
: Andover, MA
I'm glad that helped!
-Donald
------------------------------
From: "Laszlo G. Szijarto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Can't print (drivers?)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:17:31 -0400
RH7 has some serious problems with printing functionality. I blew it away
an re-installed an older version of lpr (using an RPM form RedHat 6.2) --
then everything worked just fine.
"Taavi Hein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9aar6j$7jl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've tried to get my printer working, but with no success so far. Distro
is
> RH7 (what I think was workstation ed. or smth -- 4 cd-s), printer is Xerox
> DocuPrint C6. Any idea on where I could get the appropriate drivers?
>
> Also I have a winmodem :( and it's Genius GM56PCI-L. From linmodems.org I
> found the card with Lucent chip (didn't find the drivers though -- link
> didn't work), and a rockwell chipp w/o a card (IIRC, I have a rockwell
> chip), so I'm a little confused and afraid to mess things up. Any advice
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Taavi Hein - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Registered Linux user #209546
> Registered Linux machine #97395
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Theng Ung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Squid&RH 7.0
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 23:33:35 +1000
Hi,
I had a Linux Red Hat 7.0, connect via Cable modem(with Telstra) on
ethernet adapter 0 and using firestarter as firewall.
At the moment I had set up the box as a gateway for my other PC which
connect via a second ethernet adapter 1.
I would like to get some help with a basic Squid configuration that I can
use to setup my linux gateway as proxy server for my other PC.
if I decide to user Squid as a proxy server do I need to make any adjustment
in firewall rule?
Regards,
Theng
------------------------------
From: "Martin Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sharing with Sco Opendesktop
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:05:12 +0200
Hi,
I've already got Sco Opendesktop 5.0.5 installed on my machine. I'd like
to install Caldera Linux onto the free space on the disk (~1GB). Opendesktop
is very fussy about the partition table. I know this from experience. If you
install
Microsoft into a partition on a disk which has an existing Opendesktop
installation, you'll have to reinstall Opendesktop.
Does anyone have any experience with doing this?
Thanks,
Martin.
------------------------------
From: "KW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Squid&RH 7.0
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,aus.computers.linux
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 09:09:17 -0500
We didn't have to change our firewall rules.. as long as you can get
out on the masq you should be ok.. far as setting up squid, you can
pretty much install the RPMS and goto the squid.conf file and go through
it. The .conf explains itself pretty well. If you want to run it as a
transparent proxy... you simply use prerouting to grab all packets on 80
and send them to 3128 on squid... ;)
Once we've got everyone swapped over to squid, we may make some
additional changes to the masquerading on the appropriate subnets... :)
In article <9acjfg$80u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Theng Ung"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a Linux Red Hat 7.0, connect via Cable modem(with Telstra) on
> ethernet adapter 0 and using firestarter as firewall. At the moment I
> had set up the box as a gateway for my other PC which connect via a
> second ethernet adapter 1.
>
> I would like to get some help with a basic Squid configuration that I
> can use to setup my linux gateway as proxy server for my other PC. if I
> decide to user Squid as a proxy server do I need to make any adjustment
> in firewall rule?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Theng
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Condon)
Subject: Re: Swap: how big?
Date: 3 Apr 2001 14:12:15 GMT
Tomaz Cedilnik wrote:
>Craig Kelley wrote:
>
>> > wonder if the swapfile is big enough. I have got 256 MB RAM, is a
>> > swapfile really even necessary?
>>
>> YES. You want a place to put stuff that isn't being used, and your
>> system will run slower without the swap file. 128MB is probably fine.
>
>Doesn't it depend on how much memory gets used? I know about I/O
>buffers, but with a lot of RAM I don't think you should worry. Unless
>you have bigger needs.
>
>I've got 128 MB RAM and 126 MB swap. Wouldn't for example 256 MB of RAM
>and no swap be better?
Of course more RAM is better, but however much physical RAM you have your
performance will be better if you add some swap.
Yes, 256M RAM is better than 128M RAM + 128M swap.
But, 256M RAM + 128M swap is better than 256M RAM.
--
Nick
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
