Linux-Setup Digest #257, Volume #21              Fri, 18 May 01 13:13:13 EDT

Contents:
  Re: when linux is booted before the windows 2000  server in the LAN......! (Angry 
Bob)
  Re: backup + repartitioning (Angry Bob)
  Re: I need help. RH7.1 wont configure my ATI Xpert 128 AGP 32 RAM. Log attached 
("Sarkie")
  Re: LILO 1024 cylinder limit (Mark Bratcher)
  Re: Why oh why (disk partitioning) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: "Bay Manager" support in Linux? (RH 7) ("Dave Mann")
  Re: Why oh why (disk partitioning) ("Peter T. Breuer")
  Boot up problem ("eric")
  Ximian GNOME packages for potato -> CD-ROM ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  upgrade to RH 7.1 sendmail (Scott Beckman)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Angry Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: when linux is booted before the windows 2000  server in the LAN......!
Date: 18 May 2001 15:56:39 GMT

What would you like to read?  [[EMAIL PROTECTED] or ?*]
this is a "v.naga srinivas" scroll!  it says:

>               I just observed a quite interesting problem.
> I have one Linux and Windows 2000 Servers and Windows NT workstation machines.
> Whats my problem is, when i start my linux machine before windows 2000 servers..
> I could't able to see the work group ( can't open the network neighbour hood to
> see all the machines in the network). Its giving an error.. I openened the
> event viewer, 
>              I have the message, " The Master Browser has received a server
> announcement from the computer 'mycomputername' that believes that it is the
> master browser for the domain on transport NetBT_Tcpip {23303003-9330..}
> The master browser is stopping or an election is being forced."

> But i can able to see the network neighbour hood of Windows98 and WindowsNT
> workstations . Why the windows2000 is not? When I start 1st the windows2000
> servers and then Linux, its OK.. No error.

Hrm.... linux doesn't participate in the windows election process (IIRC
it is handeled over netbeui, but I could be wrong).  Perhaps the order
in which you are turning on the windows machines is more important?

you appear to have multiple machines that think that they are the master
browser (not uncommon for windows), so they have to duke it out every
time they are turned on.  They get in a little argument and eventually
one of them decides that it is the winner, and hopefully the other
realises that it is the loser.  

I don't think that linux takes any part in the discussion, but perhaps
windows is mangling it's packets (also not uncommon) in such a way as to
glean a response.  This is somewhat doubtful though.... you should get
thyself a copy of ethereal and sniff the entire process and figure out
what is going on. 

-- 
AngryBob                        Systems Consultant - http://www.trellisinc.com
  "It is ridiculous claiming that video games influence children. For
   instance, if Pac-man affected kids born in the eighties, we should
   by now have a bunch of teenagers who run around in darkened rooms
   and eat pills while listening to monotonous electronic music."
                        -- Joachim Lous

------------------------------

From: Angry Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: backup + repartitioning
Date: 18 May 2001 15:58:56 GMT

What would you like to read?  [[EMAIL PROTECTED] or ?*]
this is a Alexander Martinez scroll!  it says:

> can I use more than 1 swap device?

I usually put some swap on all my drives.... that way I can pull one out
and not be lacking in swap.

-- 
AngryBob                        Systems Consultant - http://www.trellisinc.com
        I often imagine, with full visuals, what playing nethack
        sober would be like.  
                        --sdpcat (from rec.games.roguelike.nethack)

------------------------------

From: "Sarkie" <((REMOVE the EXTRA , )) [email protected]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: I need help. RH7.1 wont configure my ATI Xpert 128 AGP 32 RAM. Log 
attached
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:11:36 -0400

Hi Gene,
    I like this fast card since I a dual booting and using Win2k, I did take
the ATI rage 128 AGP card out and put in my 10 year old (slow)Matrox MGA 4
meg PCI card and it freaking worked. I don't understand why this 1 year <
card wont work.  What do you recommend? give up on this card? is there
something I can do to get this card to work?

Thanks
Rich

"Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Gene Heskett sends Greetings to (REMOVE the;
>
>  tE> I have an ATI Rage 128 4x AGP card 32ram and a Viewsonic A75f
monitor.
>  tE> Could someone provide me a XF86config or tell me which file I need to
>  tE> edit i.e, XF86config  XF86config-4, I have no clue which one to use,
but
>  tE> it appears that the X server wants to use the -4 file. Please be a
little
>  tE> more specific, I am new to Linux :) please?
>
>  tE> My log output is below, Please tell me exactly what I have to do.
>  tE> Please CC your response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ask here, get answer here so that all may benefit.
>
> I'm going to snip the log, but essentially it reports very close to the
> same thing I just got with a "Rage Fury Pro 32mb" + VIVO card.
>
> The difference is that my failure log reported from scanpci the the card
> number was 5446, not 544d as yours does.  Run scanpci -v by hand for a
> full report.
>
> I'm convinced in my case that ATI has made a new card, but has neglected
> to tell the box artwork people.  Even Xig's drivers for *that* card
> could not find that card.  Given the time lag between a new card coming
> onto the scene, and working drivers for linux typically being a year, I
> took the card back for a refund.  Xig said they would have to go buy one
> and write new drivers for it.
>
> Based on the fact that ATI *may* be using a sequential numbering system,
> and my 5446 wasn't recognized, your 544d (assumeing a hex numbering
system)
> is in the same category.  Take it back for a refund and get if you can,
> some older but fast enough model.  I am continueing that search for
> myself, but the only thing I can find locally is the nvidia card at $230
> USD on the Circuit City shelf.  I don't game, and don't need that much
> card, just one that can change a screen in the sub-second category
> instead of 2-3 seconds like this old SiS-6326 based card manages.
>
> And one more time ATI sticks it to us, at least in my opinion.  In my
> case, I have no idea if the drivers on the floppies it came with
> actually worked, there are no M$ windows in this house...
>
> [snip *most* of log]
>
>  tE> XFree86 Version 4.0.3 / X Window System
>  tE> (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
>  tE> Release Date: 16 March 2001
> [...]
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "scanpci"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
>  tE> (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 0.1.0
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
>  tE> (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci"
>  tE> (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
>  tE> (II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
>  tE> (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge:
>  tE> (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
> [...]
>  tE> (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x534d) rev 0, Mem @
>  tE> 0xd0000000/26,
>  tE> 0xd5000000/14, I/O @ 0x9000/8
>  tE> (II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
>  tE>  [0] -1 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B]
>  tE>  [1] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B]
>  tE> (II) OS-reported resource ranges:
>  tE>  [0] -1 0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
>  tE>  [1] -1 0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
>  tE>  [2] -1 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [3] -1 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [4] -1 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [5] -1 0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
>  tE> (II) Active PCI resource ranges:
>  tE>  [0] -1 0xd9039000 - 0xd90390ff (0x100) MX[B]
>  tE>  [1] -1 0xd9000000 - 0xd901ffff (0x20000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [2] -1 0xd9030000 - 0xd9037fff (0x8000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [3] -1 0xd9020000 - 0xd902ffff (0x10000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [4] -1 0xd9038000 - 0xd903803f (0x40) MX[B]
>  tE>  [5] -1 0xd6000000 - 0xd7ffffff (0x2000000) MX[B]
>  tE>  [6] -1 0xd5000000 - 0xd5003fff (0x4000) MX[B](B)
>  tE>  [7] -1 0xd0000000 - 0xd3ffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
>  tE>  [8] -1 0x0000c000 - 0x0000c0ff (0x100) IX[B]
>  tE>  [9] -1 0x0000bc00 - 0x0000bc3f (0x40) IX[B]
>  tE>  [10] -1 0x0000b800 - 0x0000b83f (0x40) IX[B]
>  tE>  [11] -1 0x0000b400 - 0x0000b403 (0x4) IX[B]
>  tE>  [12] -1 0x0000b000 - 0x0000b007 (0x8) IX[B]
>  tE>  [13] -1 0x0000ac00 - 0x0000ac03 (0x4) IX[B]
>  tE>  [14] -1 0x0000a800 - 0x0000a807 (0x8) IX[B]
>  tE>  [15] -1 0x0000a400 - 0x0000a43f (0x40) IX[B]
>  tE>  [16] -1 0x0000a000 - 0x0000a01f (0x20) IX[B]
>  tE>  [17] -1 0x0000f000 - 0x0000f00f (0x10) IX[B]
>  tE>  [18] -1 0x00009000 - 0x000090ff (0x100) IX[B](B)
> [...]
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "dbe"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdbe.a
>  tE> (II) Module dbe: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
>  tE>  Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
>  tE> (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "extmod"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libextmod.a
>  tE> (II) Module extmod: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
>  tE>  Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
>  tE> (II) Loading extension SHAPE
>  tE> (II) Loading extension MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
>  tE> (II) Loading extension BIG-REQUESTS
>  tE> (II) Loading extension SYNC
>  tE> (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
>  tE> (II) Loading extension XC-MISC
>  tE> (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension
>  tE> (II) Loading extension XFree86-Misc
>  tE> (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA
>  tE> (II) Loading extension DPMS
>  tE> (II) Loading extension FontCache
>  tE> (II) Loading extension TOG-CUP
>  tE> (II) Loading extension Extended-Visual-Information
>  tE> (II) Loading extension XVideo
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "type1"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libtype1.a
>  tE> (II) Module type1: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
>  tE>  Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2
>  tE> (II) Loading font Type1
>  tE> (II) Loading font CID
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "freetype"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.a
>  tE> (II) Module freetype: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.1.9
>  tE>  Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2
>  tE> (II) Loading font FreeType
>  tE> (II) LoadModule: "r128"
>  tE> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o
>  tE> (II) Module r128: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>  tE>  compiled for 2.49.119E{, module version = 4.0.1
>  tE>  Module class: XFree86 Video Driver
>  tE>  ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4
>  tE> (EE) module ABI minor version (4) is newer than the server's version
(3)
>  tE> (II) UnloadModule: "r128"
>  tE> (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o
>  tE> (EE) Failed to load module "r128" (module requirement mismatch, 0)
> [...]                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  tE> (EE) No drivers available.
>
> This is the real error, the drivers (r128) never found _that_ card.
>
>  tE> Fatal server error:
>  tE> no screens found
>
> Minor detail.
>
>
> Cheers, Gene
> --
>   Gene Heskett, CET, UHK       |Amiga A2k Zeus040, Linux @ 500mhz
> email gene underscore heskett at iolinc dot net
> #Amiga based X10 home automation program EZHome, see at:#
>  <http://www.iolinc.net/gene_heskett>
> This messages reply content, but not any previously quoted material,
> is � 2001 by Gene Heskett, all rights reserved.  Due to recent
> changes in M$ lusers TOS, mail from msn.com, msn.net, microsoft.com,
> microsoft.net, hotmail.com, and hotmail.net is auto-deleted, unread.
> --
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Bratcher)
Crossposted-To: 
alt.comp.linux,alt.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: LILO 1024 cylinder limit
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:16:14 GMT

On Fri, 18 May 2001 08:25:55 GMT, James Richard Tyrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took up his/her 
discourse and spake:
>"Rene M�rten" wrote:
>
>> Also wrong :=)
>> With the newest LILO you can boot from any position on your harddisk.
>
>Don't you have to use "lba32" to do that?
>

Yes.

-- 
Mark Bratcher
To reply direct, remove both underscores (_) from my email name
===============================================================
Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why oh why (disk partitioning)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:16:36 +0100
Reply-To: no_replyto@oursite

This message has been posted by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Ewart)

On Fri, 18 May 2001 17:31:34 +0200, Alexander Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello Peter & Dave,
>
>there is no reason to be offensive, I just did what Peet asked for -
>telling _my_ opinion.

I don't think anyone wrote anything offensive.  The topic of
partitioning is very subjective and all I posted was a balanced argument
of ideas surrounding the issue.

>> >>/           100MB
>> >>/boot    10MB
>> >>/tmp    200 MB
>> >>/var     100MB
>> >>/home  150MB
>> >>/root    50MB
>> >>swap    128MB
>> >>/usr    remaining space
>>
>> > [I said you'd get a different answer from every person!]
>>
>> Correct.
>
>for this reason I named it "my suggestion", not "Alex's Rule". this
>setup works just fine for _me_ (as I told earlier)

Perhaps I should have added a smiley to my remark - "Everyone will give
you a different answer :-)"

>> > I am not disputing that the partitioning is suitable for you,
>> > Alexander, but everyone's needs are different.
>>
>> Correct.
>
>Have I told you anything different?

No, this remark was not really aimed at _you_, it was aimed at the
original poster who was the one seeking advice.  

>> > Just as an example, to indicate why the above scheme may not be
>> > appropriate, is the /tmp partition.  As far as I can tell, FOR MY
>> > WORKSTATION, /tmp is only used by one or two apps (such as Mutt, my
>> > email program) and these files are only ever as large as a single
>> > email message.  Thus, if _I_ partitioned as you have suggested, I
>> > would have
>
>this is not correct, you forget about X or gcc and similar programs.
>For example, if I use stow to install tarballs it unpacks them under
>/tmp and then compiles them, which results in eating up a lot of
>diskspace.

You are missing my point - just because /tmp is USED dosen't necessarily
mean that it should have a separate partition.  And, the real point is
the fact that: 

If a /tmp partition is not suitable for ME, this validates my assertion
that "not everyone needs a /tmp partition" and, more generally,
"everyone needs a different setup" ...

> ... [Snip]

It was useful for you to post your partition scheme - it's of benefit
for those that have not partitioned systems before to see an example of
how it can be done.  However, I believe that it is equally important to
understand the issues and reasons behind each scheme.

Really, no offense meant!  :-)

Dave.
-- 
P.S. Apologies for the spam-trapped headers - they are added by my
outgoing news server and I have no control over them.
-- 
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK

------------------------------

From: "Dave Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "Bay Manager" support in Linux? (RH 7)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:31:10 GMT


"Kenny McCormack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9e3g55$1e1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a DELL laptop that has "Bay Manager" support in DOS/Windows - this
> allows you to connect/disconnect the external drives (floppy and CD)
without
> rebooting.  For example, you can boot with the CD, then unplug it and put
it
> away, then later you can reconnect it, and run the Bay Manager program to
> tell the OS (i.e., Windows) to re-assign the drive letter to the device.
>
> Unfortunately, in Linux, once I disconnect the CD, it is lost until I
reboot.
>
> Is there anything like this for Linux?

Have you tried the mount and unmount commands yet?

HTH

Dave




------------------------------

From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why oh why (disk partitioning)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:14:32 +0200

Alexander Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is no reason to be offensive, I just did what Peet asked for - telling _my_ 
>opinion.

Eh? Is this a joke? Offensive about what? Where? Huh? Are you perhaps
misinterpreting what has been written here?

> "Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > This message has been posted by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave 
>Ewart)
>> > On Fri, 18 May 2001 11:19:25 +0200, Alexander Martinez
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>/           100MB
>> >>/boot    10MB
>> >>/tmp    200 MB
>> >>/var     100MB
>> >>/home  150MB
>> >>/root    50MB
>> >>swap    128MB
>> >>/usr    remaining space
>>
>> > [I said you'd get a different answer from every person!]
>>
>> Correct.

> for this reason I named it "my suggestion", not "Alex's Rule". this setup works just 
>fine
> for _me_ (as I told earlier)

What? Nobody is disagreeing with you!

>> > I am not disputing that the partitioning is suitable for you, Alexander,
>> > but everyone's needs are different.
>>
>> Correct.

> Have I told you anything different?

Different to what? You're being agreed with!

>> > Just as an example, to indicate why the above scheme may not be
>> > appropriate, is the /tmp partition.  As far as I can tell, FOR MY
>> > WORKSTATION, /tmp is only used by one or two apps (such as Mutt, my
>> > email program) and these files are only ever as large as a single email
>> > message.  Thus, if _I_ partitioned as you have suggested, I would have

> this is not correct, you forget about X or gcc and similar programs. For example, if 
>I use
> stow to install tarballs it unpacks them under /tmp and then compiles them, which 
>results

It may, and it may not. I daresay it unpacks them under /tmp accrding
to the value of TMPDIR.

> in eating up a lot of diskspace.

This is what I said.

>> /tmp is usually softlinked to /var/tmp, so the question moves itself to
>> how big should  /var be.

> not usually, in debian2.2 (which I use), it is not that way - /tmp and /var/tmp are

You misunderstand the sentence. You SHOULD symlink it to /var/tmp. It
is a mistake to have a /tmp in the / partition unless you have no other
partition that can contain it. So it is usually (re)symlinked to
/var/tmp.

> separate. sure, I could use ln -s to alter this, but I like to have /tmp on its own
> partition. If this partition crashes, I loose no important data..

Why not link it to /var/tmp?

>> But I often compile temporarily in /tmp (i.e. /var/tmp) so I need a lot
>> of space there 1GB is about by comfort point for /var. I also need about
>> 100MB for log files in /var/log  (I prefer to have 6 months of logs, and
>> if I turn on debugging on codes can fill 50MB a day easily)

> my /var has an average fill of 60MB

That's about right. It would leave you with 60MB for /tmp if you linked
/tmp to /var/tmp and had /var at 128MB, which I suggested as the
minimum size.

FOr comparison:

nbd:/tmp% sudo du -sx /var/*
6603    /var/account
2       /var/autofs
139     /var/backups
5679    /var/cache
0       /var/home
33309   /var/lib
1       /var/list
1       /var/lists
1       /var/local
2       /var/lock
30779   /var/log
114     /var/lost+found
0       /var/mail
3       /var/news
58      /var/run
6       /var/samba
5078    /var/spool
12287   /var/state
159721  /var/tmp
70      /var/www
22      /var/yp


>> > effectively wasted 200MB of space that could be used elsewhere (e.g.
>> > /home, if you have a lot of "data", or perhaps /usr, if you have a lot
>> > of programs to install).  I agree that some users may need a large /tmp
>> > partition, but it is not always appropriate.

> no one said this

He "agrees with" does not imply that anyone said it. I agree with
the emancipation of slaves, but nobody said so!

>> It's never necessary as _ /tmp _, but is often necessary as /var/tmp.
>> Burning cd images is an example of how to use 700MB of tmpspace in a
>> hurry.

> I use a special drive for such purposes..

You  needn't bother. The use is strictly "temporary".

>> > Similarly, I don't see any need on my workstation to partition /root
>> > separately, since there is nothing of consequence contained there.
>>
>> Agreed. What's more, it should never be used!

> maybe you are right. One time I needed it because I often reinstalled Linux, just to 
>test
> different distros and didn't want to lose my settings. today I think it is only a bad
> habbit.. but there is no need to repartition..

>> > Furthermore, allocating 100MB to /var may be a mistake, since (usually)
>> > only incoming user mail spools and news go here.  If it is a single user

> and print jobs,  logs and stuff. not to forget mysql dbs (under /var/lib/mysql)

>> And logs, and fonts, and various other things that "vary".
>>
>> > system, 100MB is probably too much.  Conversely, for a news server, it
>>
>> No, I don't think so. I'd suggest 128MB for a minimal install and about
>> 1GB for me!
>>
>> > is clearly too small.
>>
>> > The underlying point I am trying to make is that the partitioning scheme
>> > should closely reflect your needs.  Admittedly, sometimes this is very
>> > difficult!  There is no "correct" partition scheme.

> that is true, if i am forcing someone to use _my_ setup, i will be all wrong. and i 
>am
> criticizing noone who uses a different setup. mine simply works for me at home and 
>for the
> workstations in our computer science lab here at my university.. and there are no
> complaints till now..

>> Very true.
>>
>> > I would advise the original poster to have a careful think about what
>> > "data" and programs are to be installed initially, and how that might
>> > change over time.  Base your partitioning scheme on this.  Two people
>> > with exactly the same specification of PC will probably want different
>> > partitioning schemes because they will be using the PC differently.

> fine, thats all true.

Peter

------------------------------

From: "eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Boot up problem
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:34:27 +0800

After I typed "reboot -n", I want to login again, but after I type the user
name, the server doesn't prompt for password.  And when I press
"Ctrl+Alt+Del", the following message is displayed :

"You don't exist...Go away"

Can anyone help me to solve this problem??



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Ximian GNOME packages for potato -> CD-ROM
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:41:13 +0000 (UTC)

[ This is a repost of the following article:                               ]
[ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                     ]
[ Subject: Ximian GNOME packages for potato                                ]
[ Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux                                             ]
[ Message-ID: <9e38nd$882$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             ]
[My apologies for the xpost]
Hi,
        I want to download the packages for Ximian Gnome 1.4 for potato,
toast them into a CD and carry them home for much excitement. I have
downloaded all the .deb and .gz files, but I can find no Packages.gz
(and not task-ximian package...), so I was wondering what the best way
of getting something I can apt-cdrom add, apt-get install task-ximian
might be (there's around 250 debs here!)

        Cheers,
        Jos�

-- 
Jos� L G�mez Dans                       PhD student
Tel: +44 114 222 5582                   Radar & Communications Group
FAX; +44 870 132 2990                   Department of Electronic Engineering
                                        University of Sheffield UK

------------------------------

From: Scott Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat
Subject: upgrade to RH 7.1 sendmail
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:08:14 -0700

Hello,

I upgraded from redhat 7.0 to 7.1.  I have a static IP and run sendmail
to send and receive e-mail from my localhost.  

After the upgrade I was no longer able to receive mail.  I'm able to 

1. send mail to any address
2. receive mail from users on localhost
3. use fetchmail to collect mail from any POP account.

When I send mail from an outside host to my email address a message is
returned with the error:

"   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Connection refused by
myhostname.mydomainname.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
"

I've compared my /etc/mail/access file to my officemate (who's running
7.0) and they are identical.  

Has anyone had similar experiences with the upgrade from RH7.0 to 7.1?  
We've upgraded several systems on our groups computers and they all seem
to be having the same problem so this must be common.  

Thanks
Scott Beckman

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************

Reply via email to