On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Andy Poling wrote: > One man's "ancient" is another man's "stable". [snip] > > Besides it's hard to brag about months of uptime if you're rebooting to > install new kernels. :-) I'm working on a 142+ day uptime myself with a 2.0.33 SMP kernel. Doing great... Marc Christensen | Check out the linux-access pages. SysOp CDSS University of Utah | linux-access - Making a difference! http://ssv1.union.utah.edu | http://ssv1.union.utah.edu/linux-access/
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Andy Poling
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert G. Brown
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Richard L. England, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Douglas Ridgway
- Re: <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Marc E. Christensen
- Re: <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Heath
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dale E. Martin
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? System Administrator
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Daniel Veillard
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dave J. Andruczyk
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Chris Weyl
- NFS problem on SMP machine Khairul Azmi Abu Bakar
