> One man's "ancient" is another man's "stable".
I certainly agree.
>
> Believe it or not, there are a few (ahem) folks running SMP systems in
> production, and the 2.0 kernels may not be the cat's meow, but they
> certainly are the tool for the job if you want/need stability above all else.
>
> Besides it's hard to brag about months of uptime if you're rebooting to
> install new kernels. :-)
For those of us who run multiuser systems we can't stand to reboot every
other day, for various debugging reasons. I've been stable, and fast on
several Dual Ppro200 servers, with 2.0.35 (RH 5.1), with never a lockup.
The only problems I get are NFS related, where the mountd daemon dies for
some unknown reason..
dave
