On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Marc E. Christensen wrote: > I'm working on a 142+ day uptime myself with a 2.0.33 SMP kernel. Doing > great... quake:~> uname -a Linux quake 2.0.29 #3 Mon Nov 17 10:40:36 EST 1997 i686 quake:~> uptime 7:48pm up 311 days, 2:44, 1 user, load average: 0.69, 0.31, 0.28 quake:~> Not doing to badly here? :-) -- mark heath - Unix System Programmer/Engineer - Netspace Online Systems. -- http://www.netspace.net.au/ /V\ /\ |Z |< [Personal /~mheath] -- Linux: Just do what you want. :wq
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert G. Brown
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Robert M. Hyatt
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Richard L. England, Jr.
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Douglas Ridgway
- <TID> Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Marc E. Christensen
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Heath
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dale E. Martin
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? System Administrator
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Alan Cox
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Daniel Veillard
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Dave J. Andruczyk
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Chris Weyl
- NFS problem on SMP machine Khairul Azmi Abu Bakar
- Re: 2.0.36 anyone? Adam D. McKenna
