> Well - that is not completly true: Do not install a distribution with > the > packages compiled with libc5, the distrib should have Glibc 2.1. > Most recent distributions do, like RedHat 6.0 and SuSE 6.1 but make sure > that > Slackware 4.0 also has this feature. well, Slackware 4.0 is libc5 based. it has glibc runtime support, but it is still libc5 based. personaly I like it this way. I have seen to many glib 2.1 bugs show up when I am compiling old programs on Caldera 2.2. I realy dont see the big need for Glibc support other then runtime support. feel free to inform me otherwise. Cris Wade - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Albert J. Kalinin
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Cris Wade
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Swift Kick
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Jorg B.
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Hermann Himmelbauer
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Cris Wade
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Alan Cox
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Sascha Schumann
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Red... Alan Cox
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or... Sascha Schumann
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Dick Balaska
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Jorg B.
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Matthew Smith
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Alan Cox
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Tim Fletcher
- Re: linux SMP - slackware or Redhat? Ivan Van Laningham
