Hi,
On 02/11/2014 10:26 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> On 02/10/14 20:15, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/10/2014 12:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I was a bit torn over what to do with this and the first patch ("Provide
>>> a weak scsi_init hook") since they are both essentially upstream fodder
>>> already _except_ that they wouldn't be being presented at the same time
>>> as a consumer of the change.
>>
>> I met one of the core u-boot developers, Marek Vasut at decvonf.cz and
>> ended up talking quite a bit with him about upstreaming sunxi-u-boot.
>>
>> I think that it is safe to say that they are definitively interested in
>> fixes like this going upstream immediately. So please do submit these
>> upstream as soon as you feel they are ready to go upstream.
>>
>> Upstream also is the proper place to discuss whether making the ahci
>> probe delay longer makes sense for all boards, or if we need to make it
>> an #ifdef SUXNI thing.
>>
>> BTW Oliver, the same goes for your 2G mem support patches, if you could
>> submit the non sunxi specific bits of that upstream asap that would be great.
> I'm happy you have rememberd it, I have actually, TWICE.
>
> The first time there was some talk about it being required at all, which
> Wolfgang even said it might/should [1].
>
> The second time there was even less interest [2]. I've hoped Henrik would
> pick up on it as he should have some weight in the u-boot community ... but
> alas ..
Bummer, well I guess I'll just send it upstream with the rest of the sunxi
support then when I get around to it. Note that it may be a while before
I get around to this (if you're up to doing this my invite for discussing
this over some drinks still stands).
Regards,
Hans
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
