Hi, On 02/13/2014 06:51 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > ons 2014-02-12 klockan 16:59 +0100 skrev Hans de Goede: > >> 1) Is the addition of arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cmd_boot.c really necessary, >> it is the same as common/cmd_boot.c except for the invalidate_icache_all() >> call which according to Marek should not be necessary. > > It is for standalone programs started by go. But it's discussed > separately from sunxi, see u-boot archives.
So if this is a generic u-boot problem, only affecting the go command, I guess getting this upstream is a low priority thing ? Maybe we should have 2 patch queues one with generic bug fixes, and one with sunxi specific bits ? >> 2) Is the addition of the empty arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/start.c really >> necessary? Certainly there must be a cleaner way to deal with this ? > > It's to simplify the FEL target which don't need start.o. I was thinking that the whole thing of having separate board configs for fex / non fex is ugly. What we ought to do is just build 2 versions of the SPL, so do 3 instead of 2 build rounds. Regards, Hans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
