On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:19:07AM +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > ons 2014-07-23 klockan 00:11 +0200 skrev Luc Verhaegen: > > is how people find our wiki and thus our project. If you are not > > convinced, google for cubieboard, and check the third link. > > Sorry, but I am not you at your place or time. Google sorting order is > different. Which link?
https://www.google.com/search?q=cubieboard puts us after 2 cubieboard.org links and wikipedia. https://www.google.de/search?q=cubieboard this removes the "buy" link from the .us search. > > Ok, no further action required (8): > > ----------------------------------- > > Auxtek-T004 > > Ippo_q8h > > HCore_HC860 > > INet_86VZ > > INet_K70HC > > Linksprite_pcDuino3 > > Mele_A1000 > > mk808c_A20 -> no better name possible at this time. > > > > Should get renamed in boards.cfg (12): > > -------------------------------------- > > A10-OLinuXino-Lime -> Olimex_ > > A13-OLinuXino -> Olimex_ > > A20-OLinuXino_MICRO -> Olimex_ > > Cubieboard -> Cubietech_ > > Cubieboard2 -> Cubietech_ > > Cubietruck -> Cubietech_ > > Why do you want vendor prefix on these? They are identified by > trademark. To avoid issues like with the A20-SOM below. So better prefix all and have all olimex devices sit together. I am not sure what the a80 board of cubietech will be called, cubieboard8 or something else entirely now that they have evolved from a community device maker to a SoC launch partner? > > Mini-X -> Pineriver_H24 > > Mini-X-1Gb -> Pineriver_H24_1G > > Are you sure? H24 is Mini-Xplus if I am not mistaken. How can anyone tell, without there being a wiki page with pictures of device and board of the actual mini-x? > > > Need work (22): > > --------------- > > A10s-OLinuXino-M -> Also rename to Olimex_ > > A13-OLinuXinoM -> Also rename to Olimex_ > > A20-SOM -> Also rename to Olimex_ > > Do these need any other work than renaming? Yes, otherwise they would not be listed here. Check the wiki. > > http://linux-sunxi.org/New_Device_howto > > We did not have that page when most of these were submitted. In fact > very few boards have been submitted after. Quite a few were added since November, or january 2nd, from whichever date you consider the NDH to be relevant. Do you really need me to get hard data on which boards were committed by whom since? We've learned, and now the NDH exists. And, sure, the fact that these zombies exist is (partly) due to history, but that doesn't mean that we should keep them or refuse to fix them. Luc Verhaegen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
