tor 2015-03-26 klockan 10:44 +0100 skrev Michal Suchanek: > It was only worth having this list while decent Allwinner hardware was > produced and Allwinner was somewhat cooperative with respect to > development. It seems that period of both decent hardware based on > Allwinner chips and Allwinner cooperation has ceased so there is not > much point anymore except using the existing somewhat obsolete > devices.
Allwinner is actually much more cooperative today than they have ever been. But CedarX code have never been open, ever, and have always been a sore point in all discussions. My vote is to completely forget about any CedarX binary releases from Allwinner, and focus on the reverse engineered driver. Nothing good is likely to come from the Allwinner binary driver. To continue discussions about the binary driver only makes things worse for everyone involved. The reverse engineered driver needs some love for production use, but there is not and have never been any other viable path forward for CedarX development. Regards Henrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
