+1 On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Henrik Nordström < hen...@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> tor 2015-03-26 klockan 10:44 +0100 skrev Michal Suchanek: > > > It was only worth having this list while decent Allwinner hardware was > > produced and Allwinner was somewhat cooperative with respect to > > development. It seems that period of both decent hardware based on > > Allwinner chips and Allwinner cooperation has ceased so there is not > > much point anymore except using the existing somewhat obsolete > > devices. > > Allwinner is actually much more cooperative today than they have ever > been. > > But CedarX code have never been open, ever, and have always been a sore > point in all discussions. > > My vote is to completely forget about any CedarX binary releases from > Allwinner, and focus on the reverse engineered driver. Nothing good is > likely to come from the Allwinner binary driver. To continue discussions > about the binary driver only makes things worse for everyone involved. > > The reverse engineered driver needs some love for production use, but > there is not and have never been any other viable path forward for > CedarX development. > > Regards > Henrik > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "linux-sunxi" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
