Add assertions in `bpf_link_info.uprobe_multi` test to verify that `count` and `path_size` fields are correctly populated when the fields are unset.
This tests a previous bug where the `path_size` field was not populated when `path` and `path_size` were unset. Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c index f3932941bbaa..a38cf2a999fe 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c @@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ verify_umulti_link_info(int fd, bool retprobe, __u64 *offsets, if (!ASSERT_NEQ(err, -1, "readlink")) return -1; + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); + err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len); + + ASSERT_EQ(info.uprobe_multi.count, 3, "info.uprobe_multi.count"); + ASSERT_EQ(info.uprobe_multi.path_size, strlen(path) + 1, + "info.uprobe_multi.path_size"); + for (bit = 0; bit < 8; bit++) { memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); info.uprobe_multi.path = ptr_to_u64(path_buf); -- 2.43.0
