From: Tomas Glozar <tglo...@redhat.com>

Do the same fix as in previous commit also for timerlat-hist.

Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afaze...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglo...@redhat.com>
---
 tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c 
b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
index a3907c390d67..bbeaba8b5183 100644
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
+++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_hist.c
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ struct timerlat_hist_cpu {
        int                     *thread;
        int                     *user;
 
-       int                     irq_count;
-       int                     thread_count;
-       int                     user_count;
+       unsigned long long      irq_count;
+       unsigned long long      thread_count;
+       unsigned long long      user_count;
 
        unsigned long long      min_irq;
        unsigned long long      sum_irq;
@@ -304,15 +304,15 @@ timerlat_print_summary(struct timerlat_hist_params 
*params,
                        continue;
 
                if (!params->no_irq)
-                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                        data->hist[cpu].irq_count);
 
                if (!params->no_thread)
-                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                        data->hist[cpu].thread_count);
 
                if (params->user_hist)
-                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+                       trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                         data->hist[cpu].user_count);
        }
        trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
@@ -488,15 +488,15 @@ timerlat_print_stats_all(struct timerlat_hist_params 
*params,
                trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "count:");
 
        if (!params->no_irq)
-               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                 sum.irq_count);
 
        if (!params->no_thread)
-               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                 sum.thread_count);
 
        if (params->user_hist)
-               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9d ",
+               trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ",
                                 sum.user_count);
 
        trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "\n");
-- 
2.47.0


Reply via email to