On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:12:32 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 07/31, Liao Chang wrote:
> >
> > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > @@ -1979,9 +1979,7 @@ bool uprobe_deny_signal(void)
> >     WARN_ON_ONCE(utask->state != UTASK_SSTEP);
> >  
> >     if (task_sigpending(t)) {
> > -           spin_lock_irq(&t->sighand->siglock);
> >             clear_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING);
> > -           spin_unlock_irq(&t->sighand->siglock);
> 
> Agreed, in this case ->siglock buys nothing, another signal can come
> right after spin_unlock().
> 
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
> 
> 

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Peter, can you pick this?

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to