On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 09:25:14AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Using scoped_guard() in the implementation of trace_##name() adds an
> unnecessary level of indentation.
> 

> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index b2633a72e871..e398f6e43f61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -259,8 +259,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint 
> *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
>       {                                                               \
>               if (static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) { \
>                       if (cond) {                                     \
> -                             scoped_guard(preempt_notrace)           \
> -                                     __DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args)); \
> +                             guard(preempt_notrace)();               \
> +                             __DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));   \
>                       }                                               \
>               }                                                       \
>               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) {             \
> @@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint 
> *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
>       {                                                               \
>               might_fault();                                          \
>               if (static_branch_unlikely(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) { \
> -                     scoped_guard(rcu_tasks_trace)                   \
> -                             __DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));   \
> +                     guard(rcu_tasks_trace)();                       \
> +                     __DO_TRACE_CALL(name, TP_ARGS(args));           \
>               }                                                       \
>               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {                       \
>                       WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(),                   \

Yeah, that also works.

Reply via email to