On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:40:58AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 2:47 PM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Adding tests for optimized uprobe/usdt probes.
> >
> > Checking that we get expected trampoline and attached bpf programs
> > get executed properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++-
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c | 37 +++
> > 2 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > static void __test_uprobe_syscall(void)
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
> > index 2e1b689ed4fb..7bb4338c3ee2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_syscall_executed.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > #include "vmlinux.h"
> > #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> >
> > struct pt_regs regs;
> > @@ -9,9 +11,44 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> >
> > int executed = 0;
> >
> > +SEC("uprobe")
> > +int BPF_UPROBE(test_uprobe)
> > +{
>
> I'd add a PID filter to all of these to guard against potential
> unrelated triggerings if in the future there is some parallel test
> that attaches to all uprobes or something like that. Better safe than
> sorry.
ok, makes sense, will add
thanks,
jirka
>
> > + executed++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +SEC("uretprobe")
> > +int BPF_URETPROBE(test_uretprobe)
> > +{
> > + executed++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +SEC("uprobe.multi")
> > +int test_uprobe_multi(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> > +{
> > + executed++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > SEC("uretprobe.multi")
> > int test_uretprobe_multi(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> > {
> > executed++;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +
> > +SEC("uprobe.session")
> > +int test_uprobe_session(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> > +{
> > + executed++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +SEC("usdt")
> > +int test_usdt(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> > +{
> > + executed++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
