On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 03:47:35PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue,  6 May 2025 17:48:01 +0100
> Vincent Donnefort <vdonnef...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/trace_remote_event.h 
> > b/include/linux/trace_remote_event.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..621c5dff0664
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/trace_remote_event.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_TRACE_REMOTE_EVENTS_H
> > +#define _LINUX_TRACE_REMOTE_EVENTS_H
> > +
> > +struct trace_remote;
> > +struct trace_event_fields;
> > +
> > +struct remote_event_hdr {
> > +   unsigned short  id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define REMOTE_EVENT_NAME_MAX 29
> 
> 29 is a particularly strange number. It's not even divisible by
> sizeof(short). This will leave a hole in the remote_event structure.
> 
> Should it be "30" to plug up that one byte space between name and "id"?

Ha yes 30 is what it should be!

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > +struct remote_event {
> > +   char                            name[REMOTE_EVENT_NAME_MAX];
> > +   unsigned short                  id;
> > +   bool                            enabled;
> > +   struct trace_remote             *remote;
> > +   struct trace_event_fields       *fields;
> > +   char                            *print_fmt;
> > +   void                            (*print)(void *evt, struct trace_seq 
> > *seq);
> > +};

Reply via email to