On Tue, 13 May 2025 09:48:15 +0800 Jason Xing <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int i, full_counter = 0;
> > > + struct rchan_buf *rbuf;
> > > + int offset = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!chan || !buf || flags & ~RELAY_DUMP_MASK)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + if (len < RELAY_DUMP_BUF_MAX_LEN)
> > > + return;
> >
> > So we left the memory at *buf uninitialized but failed to tell the
> > caller this. The caller will then proceed to use uninitialized memory.
> >
> > It's a programming error, so simply going BUG seems OK.
>
> Are you suggesting that I should remove the above check because
> developers should take care of the length of the buffer to write
> outside of the relay_dump function? or use this instead:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(len < RELAY_DUMP_BUF_MAX_LEN);
> ?
It's a poor interface - it returns uninitialized data while not
alerting the caller to this. You'll figure something out ;)
Perhaps
BUG_ON(len < RELAY_DUMP_BUF_MAX_LEN);
*buf = '\0';
if (!chan || (flags & ~RELAY_DUMP_MASK))
return;
We don't need to check for !buf - the oops message contains the same info.
Maybe we don't need to check !chan either. Can it be NULL here?
