在 2025/6/13 05:27, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:56 AM Tao Chen <chen.dyl...@linux.dev> wrote:

Show uprobe_multi link info with fdinfo, the info as follows:

link_type:      uprobe_multi
link_id:        9
prog_tag:       e729f789e34a8eca
prog_id:        39
type:   uprobe_multi
func_cnt:       3
pid:    0
path:   /home/dylane/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs
offset: 0xa69ed7
ref_ctr_offset: 0x0
cookie: 3
offset: 0xa69ee2
ref_ctr_offset: 0x0
cookie: 1
offset: 0xa69eed
ref_ctr_offset: 0x0
cookie: 2

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dyl...@linux.dev>
---
  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 24b94870b50..c4ad82b8fd8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3157,10 +3157,58 @@ static int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info(const 
struct bpf_link *link,
         return err;
  }

+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static void bpf_uprobe_multi_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_link *link,
+                                        struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+       struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *umulti_link;
+       char *p, *buf;
+
+       umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
+
+       buf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!buf)
+               return;
+
+       p = d_path(&umulti_link->path, buf, PATH_MAX);
+       if (IS_ERR(p)) {
+               kfree(buf);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       seq_printf(seq,
+                  "type:\t%s\n"
+                  "func_cnt:\t%u\n"

it's not really *func* (e.g., for USDTs it's basically guaranteed to
be somewhere inside the function, potentially in many places within
the same function), I'd use generic "uprobe_{cnt,count}"



will change it in v2, thanks for the advice.

+                  "pid:\t%u\n"
+                  "path:\t%s\n",
+                  umulti_link->flags == BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ?
+                                        "uretprobe_multi" : "uprobe_multi",
+                  umulti_link->cnt,
+                  umulti_link->task ? task_pid_nr_ns(umulti_link->task,
+                          task_active_pid_ns(current)) : 0,
+                  p);
+
+       for (int i = 0; i < umulti_link->cnt; i++) {
+               seq_printf(seq,
+                          "offset:\t%#llx\n"
+                          "ref_ctr_offset:\t%#lx\n"
+                          "cookie:\t%llu\n",
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].offset,
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].ref_ctr_offset,
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].cookie);
+       }
+
+       kfree(buf);
+}
+#endif
+
  static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_uprobe_multi_link_lops = {
         .release = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release,
         .dealloc_deferred = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_dealloc,
         .fill_link_info = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+       .show_fdinfo = bpf_uprobe_multi_show_fdinfo,
+#endif
  };

  static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
--
2.48.1



--
Best Regards
Tao Chen

Reply via email to