On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:07:05 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> FWIW, I recently found we have a second 'copy' of all this in
> insn_get_seg_base() / get_desc().
>
> Its all subtly different, but largely the same.
Should I just use that then?
Instead of:
cs_base = segment_base_address(regs->cs);
ss_base = segment_base_address(regs->ss);
Use:
cs_base = insn_get_seg_base(regs, INAT_SEG_REG_CS);
ss_base = insn_get_seg_base(regs, INAT_SEG_REG_SS);
As it is used in a few places in the x86 code already. Then I could get rid
of this patch.
-- Steve
