On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:43:08 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> From my perspective, making trace analysis results reliable is the most > basic guarantee tooling should provide in order to make it trusted by > users. So I am tempted to err towards robustness rather than take > shortcuts because "it does not happen often". Another solution which I'm thinking of doing for perf is to simply state: a deferred stack trace does not go to any event before events were dropped. That is, even if the stack trace is associated, if events are dropped before getting out of the kernel, just say, "Sorry, the events before the dropped events lost its user stack trace". That may better, as having no data is better than incorrect data. -- Steve
