On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 01:28:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 01:20:41PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The newly introduced vpanic() has some build issues. This series fix them > > up. > > > > As the vpanic() is only in ftrace tree for now, it is probably best to let > > this series goes to ftrace tree, if everyone is okay with that. > > Does it make sense to make panic a static inline?
I think no, code size increases by a few K: text data bss dec hex filename 12222627 6097658 479669 18799954 11edd52 vmlinux.before 12226703 6098618 479669 18804990 11ef0fe vmlinux.after (it's riscv64, I had issue converting on x86 because there's another definition of panic()) Maybe faster? But panic() doesn't need to be fast, it's not called in normal circumstances anyway. Best regards, Nam
