On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 21:43:47 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(srcu_lite, struct srcu_struct, > > You need srcu_fast because srcu_lite is being removed. They are quite > similar, but srcu_fast is faster and is NMI-safe. (This last might or > might not matter here.) > > See https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > for a srcu_fast_notrace, so something like this: Yeah, I already saw that patch. > > DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(srcu_fast, struct srcu_struct, > _T->scp = srcu_read_lock_fast(_T->lock), > srcu_read_unlock_fast(_T->lock, _T->scp), > struct srcu_ctr __percpu *scp) > > Other than that, it looks plausible. Using srcu_lite or srcu_fast is an optimization here. And since I saw you adding the guard for srcu_fast in that other thread, I'll just use normal SRCU here for this series, and in the future we could convert it over to srcu_fast. Thanks! -- Steve
