在 2025/7/25 10:25, Steven Rostedt 写道:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:11:10 +0800
Shuai Xue <xuesh...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

For the libtraceevent implementation, I believe we'd
need to:

- Add the PCI speed mapping table to libtraceevent
- Create a print function similar to other existing parsers
- Ensure perf, trace-cmd, and rasdaemon can all benefit from it

Would you like me to investigate the libtraceevent changes, or do you

Yeah, just update libtraceevent. In fact, libtraceevent has plugins for
things like this.

You can use this as an example:

   
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libtrace/libtraceevent.git/tree/plugins/plugin_jbd2.c

That adds two functions that are used in print fmt strings. Here's one:

static unsigned long long
process_jbd2_dev_to_name(struct trace_seq *s, unsigned long long *args)
{
        unsigned int dev = args[0];

        trace_seq_printf(s, "%d:%d", MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev));
        return 0;
}


int TEP_PLUGIN_LOADER(struct tep_handle *tep)
{
        tep_register_print_function(tep,
                                    process_jbd2_dev_to_name,
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_STRING,
                                    "jbd2_dev_to_name",
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_INT,
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_VOID);
[..]

The above defines:

        char *jbd2_dev_to_name(int arg0);

And when this is found in the parsing, it calls process_jbd2_dev_to_name()
passing it the arguments that was found in the trace.

You would have something like:

        tep_register_print_function(tep,
                                    process_pci_speed_string,
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_STRING,
                                    "pci_speed_string",
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_INT,
                                    TEP_FUNC_ARG_VOID);

Which will return a string and take an integer as an argument. Then you
would just implement the process_pci_speed_string() function to do the same
thing as the pci_speed_string() does in the kernel.

Oh, and here's the man page for you on tep_register_print_function()

   
https://trace-cmd.org/Documentation/libtraceevent/libtraceevent-reg_print_func.html

Hi Steve,

Thank you so much for the detailed guidance and the excellent example!
This makes it much clearer how to implement the libtraceevent support.

Should I include the libtraceevent plugin patch in the same kernel patch
series, or submit it separately? I'm not sure about the best practice
here.


-- Steve

I'll work on the libtraceevent patch and submit it according to your
guidance. Thanks again for the clear direction and the documentation
link!

Thanks.
Shuai

Reply via email to