Hi James, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/James-Bottomley/bpf-make-bpf_key-an-opaque-type/20250731-013040 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250730172745.8480-4-James.Bottomley%40HansenPartnership.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] bpf: eliminate the allocation of an intermediate struct bpf_key config: i386-randconfig-141-20250803 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250804/202508040803.nwexqjwe-...@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@linaro.org> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202508040803.nwexqjwe-...@intel.com/ smatch warnings: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1364 bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() warn: impossible condition '(key == BUILTIN_KEY) => (0-u32max == u64max)' vim +1364 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c cce4c40b960673 Daniel Xu 2024-06-12 1353 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_p, cce4c40b960673 Daniel Xu 2024-06-12 1354 struct bpf_dynptr *sig_p, 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1355 struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1356 { cce4c40b960673 Daniel Xu 2024-06-12 1357 struct bpf_dynptr_kern *data_ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)data_p; cce4c40b960673 Daniel Xu 2024-06-12 1358 struct bpf_dynptr_kern *sig_ptr = (struct bpf_dynptr_kern *)sig_p; 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1359 struct key *key = (struct key *)trusted_keyring; 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1360 const void *data, *sig; 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1361 u32 data_len, sig_len; 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1362 int ret; 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1363 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 @1364 if ((unsigned long)key == BUILTIN_KEY) BUILTIN_KEY should be changed to -1L so that this works on 32bit systems. 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1365 key = NULL; 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1366 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1367 if (system_keyring_id_check((unsigned long)key) < 0) { 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1368 /* 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1369 * Do the permission check deferred in bpf_lookup_user_key(). 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1370 * See bpf_lookup_user_key() for more details. 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1371 * 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1372 * A call to key_task_permission() here would be redundant, as 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1373 * it is already done by keyring_search() called by 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1374 * find_asymmetric_key(). 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1375 */ 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1376 ret = key_validate(key); 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1377 if (ret < 0) 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1378 return ret; 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1379 } 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1380 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1381 data_len = __bpf_dynptr_size(data_ptr); 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1382 data = __bpf_dynptr_data(data_ptr, data_len); 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1383 sig_len = __bpf_dynptr_size(sig_ptr); 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1384 sig = __bpf_dynptr_data(sig_ptr, sig_len); 74523c06ae20b8 Song Liu 2023-11-06 1385 9cc2aa8d6b5c93 James Bottomley 2025-07-30 1386 return verify_pkcs7_signature(data, data_len, sig, sig_len, key, 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1387 VERIFYING_UNSPECIFIED_SIGNATURE, NULL, 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1388 NULL); 865b0566d8f1a0 Roberto Sassu 2022-09-20 1389 } -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
