On 05-08-2025 20:26, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>Currently the syscall trace events show each value as hexadecimal, but without adding "0x" it can be confusing: sys_write(fd: 4, buf: 0x55c4a1fa9270, count: 44) Looks like the above write wrote 44 bytes, when in reality it wrote 68 bytes. Add a "0x" for all values greater or equal to 10 to remove the ambiguity. For values less than 10, leave off the "0x" as that just adds noise to the output.
I'm on the fence for the value-dependent format. This looks like it could easily make life harder for quick&dirty scripts, but then both awk's strtonum() and Python's int(x, base=16) seem to handle the presence/absence of the 0x prefix so maybe it's a non-issue. OTH, a hand-crafted regex designed after a small set of input may start to randomly fail if one field unexpectedly goes beyond 10 ... Just using explicit hex may be the best here, as the actual proper fix (type-level display hints) is harder. It could probably be implemented using btf_decl_tag() and __builtin_btf_type_id() to retrieve the BTF info.
Also change the iterator to check if "i" is nonzero and print the ", " delimiter at the start, then adding the logic to the trace_seq_printf() at the end. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rost...@goodmis.org> --- kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c index 3a0b65f89130..0f932b22f9ec 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c @@ -153,14 +153,20 @@ print_syscall_enter(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(s)) goto end;+ if (i)+ trace_seq_puts(s, ", "); + /* parameter types */ if (tr && tr->trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_VERBOSE) trace_seq_printf(s, "%s ", entry->types[i]);/* parameter values */- trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: %lx%s", entry->args[i], - trace->args[i], - i == entry->nb_args - 1 ? "" : ", "); + if (trace->args[i] < 10) + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: %lu", entry->args[i], + trace->args[i]); + else + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: 0x%lx", entry->args[i], + trace->args[i]); }trace_seq_putc(s, ')');
-- Douglas
